|
|
Analysis
Means of
Information War
Threaten Democracy and Mankind
by
Mojmir Babacek*
The report on U.S. military policy by
“Project for New American Century” states: "It is now commonly
understood that information and other new technologies … are creating a
dynamic that may threaten America's ability to exercise its dominant
military power. Potential rivals, such as China are anxious to exploit
those transformational technologies broadly, while adversaries like
Iran, Iraq and North Korea are rushing to develop ballistic missiles and
nuclear weapons … the effects of information and other advanced
technologies promise to revolutionize the nature of conventional armed
forces" (ref. 13, pg. 4 and 11). The military concept of information
technologies is, however, kept hidden from the world general public.
In February 2000 the Russian daily Segodnya, in the article "Riders of
Psychotronic Apocalypse" (1), informed that in 1996 Russian government's
information agency FAPSI warned that the effect of "informational means
of war" is comparable to "the effect of the use of weapon of mass
destruction" and produced a report entitled "Information Weapon as a
Threat to National Security of Russia". In reaction, the Russian State
Duma and consequently , the Interparliamentary Assembly of the Union of
Independent States addressed the United Nations, OBSE and the European
Council with a proposal for an international convention banning the
development and use of informational weapons. According to the same
newspaper Segodnya in March 1998, the matter was discussed with U.N.
secretary general Kofi Anan, and included on the agenda of the General
Assembly of the U.N. Most probably the USA vetoed this proposal and in
consequence , the ban of informational weapons was not discussed by the
United Nations General Assembly.
In the Doctrine of Informational Security of the Russian Federation,
signed by President Putin in September 2000, among the dangers
threatening the informational security of the Russian Federation, there
is “the threat to the constitutional rights and freedoms of people and
citizens in the sphere of spiritual life and to individual, group and
societal consciousness” by “illegal use of special means affecting
individual, group and societal consciousness.” (16). Among “the main
areas of international cooperation of the Russian Federation in the
field of information security” , is listed “banning the development,
proliferation and application of ‘information weapons’ ” (17).
In the article under discussion Segodnya described "mysterious
information-psychological" means capable not only of harming human
health, but also of blocking human free will at the subconscious level,
impairing human beings’ ability of “political, cultural and other
self-identification" and even “causing destruction of indivisible
informational and spiritual space of the Russian Federation”. According
to Russian scientist A. F. Okhatrin, those means are also capable to
kill people (2). Underneath the article, Segodnya published a review of
weapons affecting human psyche which it obtained from the Russian
Department of Defense. Together with ultrasound and microwave weapons,
there are also "psychotronic weapons" which, in addition to having the
capability of "transfering information among people", are able to act on
communication and electronic systems (1).
The Space Preservation Bill proposed by Congressman Dennis J. Kucinich
in the U.S. House of Representatives in 2001, names the following
technologies enabling access to the human brain, human health impairment
or the killing of people: "land-based, sea-based or space-based systems
using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser or other
energies directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the
purpose of information war, mood managment or mind control of such
persons or populations" (4). "Psychotronic weapon" listed in the Dennis
J. Kucinich's bill is described as a weapon using "torsion fields"
radiation in the book "Psychotronic Weapon and the Security of Russia"
(6) by Russian scientist Vladimir Tsygankov and Vladimir Lopatin (a
politician, who worked on Committees on Security in Russian Federal
Republic, State Duma of the Russian Federation and the
Interparliamentary Assembly of the Union of Independent States). Among
the possible sources of remote influence on human psyche those two
authors list “generators of physical fields” of "known as well as
unknown nature" (14). It is common knowledge that both KGB and CIA
carried out a large-scale research of psychic phenomena in the 70’s of
the past century. It is not out of question that their scientists
succeded in discovering the physical basis of those phenomena.
Among the known physical concepts non-local electron and photon
connection can be used to explain telepathy. The ability of sound and
light technologies to influence human psyche is exemplified by
Psychowalkman industry. The existence of the electromagnetic mind
control technology is confirmed in the Conclusion of the Committee on
Security of the Russian State Duma [3] and can be deduced from
scientific and military literature.
Nerve impulses in the brain are carried by electrical signals triggered
by changes in chemical balance. During the fifties and sixties of the
past century, it was proved that human nervous system and behavior can
be thoroughly controlled by electric signals imported to the brain by
tiny electrodes (41). 100 stimulations of one point in the bull‘s brain
made him 100 times bellow. When a man was asked to straighten his hand
the bending of which was stimulated he replied “I think your electricity
is stronger than my will.” By means of electrical stimulation of the
brain the rhythm of breathing and heart beat [this was even stopped for
several pulses] was affected as well as the function of the most of the
viscera - like the secretion of the gall bladder. The stimulation of
areas in the brain where feelings and emotions reside produced
decisions. A passive, depressed woman tore up a piece of paper when her
center of anger was stimulated: “I did not control myself. I had to get
up and tear”, she commented. An aggressive woman, with the same area
stimulated, got up and smashed against the wall the guitar she was
playing until the moment of stimulation. The intensity of feelings could
be controlled by turning the knob which reduced or increased the
intensity of the electric current. When the pleasure area was stimulated
women offered marriage to therapists. Stimulation of a particular area
in a female monkey‘s brain ended her motherly care for a newborn baby.
When the limbic system was stimulated the patients vigilance weakened,
they lost the ability to think, they often began to undress or grope and
when the stimulation stopped they could not remember what was happening.
The signals had to be delivered in specific frequencies to produce
repetitive action of neurons. Spanish scientist Jose Delgado became
world known when he, with the use of this technology, made a bull attack
him by pressing one button on the small black box and stopped the bull
few feet away from him by pressing another button.
The idea that electric currents in the brain could be induced by
electromagnetic energy is obviously subsequent step in this path of
research. The information inside of the brain is processed digitally; in
other words analog perceptions are “translated” and transferred by a
number and frequency of nerve impulses, while the intensity of the
feeling or perception usually corresponds to the intensity of electrical
current. Walter J. Freeman, who had been for years measuring the brain
activity in reaction to different stimuli by multitudes of
microelectrodes, presented already in 1975 a hypothesis “that a novel
external stimulus is broadly transmitted from the primary sensory cortex
or thalamus to other parts of the cortex... transmission occurs at some
characteristic frequency, and...reception occurs in ... sets tuned to
that frequency” (37). In other words, when neurons cooperate in the
processing of specific information they synchronize their activity and
oscillate in the same frequency. In an experiment by Wolf Singer (20)
the differences in brain activity in reaction to two different stimuli,
presented to the tested subject at the same time, were represented by
two different groups of neurons oscillating in different frequencies. In
the modern scientific literature synchronization of frequencies of
emitted nerve impulses in different parts of the brain as a principle of
brain functioning is generally accepted (19). Electroencephalographers
have no doubt that those synchronizations appear on the EEG recordings
and are already able to “read” in those frequencies the single letters
of a word perceived by the tested subject (21). Theoretically this means
that the events in the brain can be produced “synthetically” from the
outside when additional energy is pumped into the brain in specific
frequencies corresponding to specific brain activities. John Marks, in
his book on CIA mind control research, quotes one of the CIA research
veterans recalling a colleague’s joke: “If you could find the natural
radio frequency of a person‘s sphincter, you could make him run out of
the room real fast” (22). Since most of the activity of human brain
takes place in frequencies from 1 to 100 Hz and electromagnetic waves of
this frequency are hundreds and even thousands of miles long, and, for
that matter, could not target human brain, scientists started
experimenting with pulsed microwaves. There are “window” microwave
frequencies which penetrate deep enough into the brain tissue to produce
activity of neurons there.
The interaction of electromagnetic radiation and chemicals in the brain
was proved for example by the experiment where irradiation of rats’
heads by 20 and 40 mW/cm2 microwaves pulsed at 300, 600 and 1000 Hz woke
the rats up in 5 minutes from narcosis (23). Electrical signals of
neurons in the brain are mediated by chemicals called neurotransmitters.
At a conference on “Emerging Electromagnetic Medicine” in 1989 Capt.
Paul Tyler, director of the U.S. Navy Electromagnetic Radiation Project
between 1970 and 1977, quoted in his lecture the research of Dr. Merrit
who measured the decrease of norepinephrine, serotonine and dopamine
when a field of 80 mW/cm2 was applied (24). All those hormones act as
neurotransmitters into the cortex. Dopamin influences the ability to
learn and other cognitive abilities. Disruption in the biosynthesis or
transmission of dopamine can lead to Parkinson’s disease. In another
experiment a 500Hz signal produced release of neradrenaline in
sympathetical neurons (25). Since those neurons control the muscles of
internal organs and noraderenaline acts there as a neurotransmitter, an
oposite signal should be able to reduce the activity of internal organs
and eventually impair human health. The publication of the World Health
Organization on the effects of electromagnetic radiation on living
organisms from 1981 (25) gives many examples of the effects of microwave
radiation on the excretion of glands and chemical composition of blood.
Many of those effects could harm human health. Microwave radiation can
also affect molecules of DNA and thus affect the development of
organisms (25). This was proved by an experiment by Yale
neurophysiologist, Jose Delgado, where the irradiation of chicken
embryos by 10, 100 and 1000 Hz stopped their development including the
development of hearts and veins. The experiment was replicated by the
American Navy with the same results. Such attack by microwaves could
have, in the long run, disastrous impact on targeted populations.
A a matter of fact microwave radiation can produce many deadly effects.
In the experiment by McAffee already mentioned, the microwaves pulsed at
300, 600 and 1000 Hz produced impairment in breathing (even leading to
suffocation) in rats. A similar signal could also suffocate human
beings. At the conference on Nonlinear Electrodynamics in Biological
Systems in 1983 the experiment was presented where blood clots were
formed by microwave radiation (26). This capability is also suitable for
weaponisation. Similarly dangerous is the finding of Allan Frey that
radio frequency radiation can weaken the blood-brain barrier that
prevents poisonous chemicals from the access into the brain (30). In
1986 the American Air Force issued a book “Low Intensity Conflict and
Modern Technology” (18). The chapter “Electromagnetic Spectrum in Low
Intensity Conflict”, was written by Capt. Paul Tyler, who had been the
director of the U.S. Navy Electromagnetic Radiation Project from 1970
until 1977. At the beginning of the chapter, Capt. Tyler quotes a source
entitled “Final Report on Biotechnology Research Requirements for
Aeronautical Systems Through the Year 2000” that had been issued by
American Air Force in 1982: “Currently available data allow the
projection that specially generated radiofrequency radiation (RFR)
fields may pose a powerful and revolutionary antipersonnel military
threats ... the passage of approximately 100 miliamperes through the
myocardium can lead to cardiac standstill and death ... A rapidly
scanning RFR system could provide an effective stun or kill capability
over a large area. System effectiveness will be a function of wave form,
field intensity, pulse width, repetition frequency, and carrier
frequency.”
In less draconian assault, the use of microwaves could be limited just
to the influence of human behavior. In 1985 Kathleen McAuliffe visited
Jose Delgado in his laboratory in Spain, where he experimented with
electromagnetic stimulation of brain. She subsequently wrote an article
for the magazine OMNI (27). Jose Delgado showed her how he could make an
ape fall asleep, or make it overactive, or how he could calm down
fighting fish using suitably modulated microwave radiation.
The next series of experiments shows that human behavior can be
controlled in even more intricate ways. In 1962 Allan H. Frey published
in the “Journal of Applied Physiology” (28) the results of
experimentation with transmission of sounds into the brain by
electromagnetic radiation at a distance of up to 1000 feet. The
“electromagnetic” sounds were heard by deaf as well as hearing people.
In his report, Frey writes that, by then, only the visual system had
been shown to respond to electromagnetic energy and he noted that, “With
somewhat different transmission parameters we can induce the perception
of severe buffeting of the head..” and ”Changing ... parameters again,
one can induce a ‘pins-and-needles’ sensation.” Frey’s experiment was
replicated several times by other scientists (28). Another, more
advanced experiment that involved the transmission of radio modulated
with audible sounds into the brain, was published only inadvertently,
when Don R. Justesen published, in the article on "Microwaves and
Behavior" (29), the result of an experiment described to him over the
telephone conversation by his colleague J. C. Sharp, who worked on a
secret military project Pandora. Joseph C. Sharp at the Walter Reed Army
Institute improved the method of Frey to the point that he was able to
transmit into the experimental subject’s brain words which he could
understand. The ability of U.S. military to produce perception of speech
in humans by microwave radiation substantiates the article by Sharon
Weinberger, “Mind Games”, which was published in The Washington Post in
January 2007. In response to a Freedom of Information Act request filed
for the article the Air Force released “records that note that the
patent was based on human experimentation in October 1994 at the Air
Force lab, where scientists were able to transmit phrases into the heads
of human subjects” The article also states that “the research
laboratory, citing classification, refused to discuss it or release
other materials” (31).
Robert Becker, who was twice nominated for Nobel price for his share in
the discovery of the effects of pulsed fields at the healing of broken
bones, wrote in his book (30) about the experiment by J. F. Schapitz,
who stated: “In this investigation it will be shown that the spoken word
of hypnotist may also be conveyed by modulated electromagnetic energy
directly into the subconcscious parts of the human brain - i. e. without
employing any technical devices for receiving or transcoding the
messages and without the person exposed to such influence having a
chance to control the information input consciously.” In one of the four
experiments subjects were given a test of hundred questions, ranging
from easy to technical ones. Later, not knowing they were being
irradiated, they would be subjected to information beams suggesting the
answers to the questions they had left blank, amnesia for some of their
correct answers, and memory falsification for other correct answers.
After 2 weeks they had to pass the test again (30). The results of those
experiments were never published. It is rather evident that in those
experiments the messages were sent into human brain in ultrasound
frequencies which the human brain perceives, but of which the subject is
unaware. According to Russian newspapers, in this way, people may be
programmed to perform different actions in the same way people can be
programmed under hypnosis. In Moscow there exists Psychocorrection
Center, where this method is used to heal psychical diseases such as
alcoholism. The use of this method was questioned in the Russian press
when general Lev Rokhlin was killed by his wife in his sleep at 2 a.m.
after she had had a casual telephone conversation with a female friend.
Did her friend use a sequence of words which were supposed to trigger
the murderous action? Before his murder General Rokhlin planned for army
protests against army reform and visited editor’s desks of Russian
newspapers, telling them he might be soon killed in a car accident,
during a drinking spree or during an argument with his wife (42).
In his other book “Cross Currents” Robert Becker presents the report
coming from the Microwave Research Department at the Walter Reed Army
Institute, where J.C. Sharp carried out his experiment with the
transmission of words into the brain by radiofrequency radiation. The
report deals with the effects of pulsed microwaves on the nervous system
and describes the division of testing program into four parts: 1) prompt
debilitating effects; 2) prompt stimulation auditory effects; 3) work
interference (stoppage) effects; 4) effects on stimulus controlled
behavior. The report presents this conclusion: “Microwave pulses appear
to couple to the central nervous system and produce stimulation similar
to electrical stimulation unrelated to heat” (32).
In the second volume of the Final Report on Biotechnology Research
Requirements for Aeronautical Sysmes of the American Air Force it is
stated: “While initial attention should be toward degradation of human
performance through thermal loading and electromagnetic filed effects,
subsequent work should address the possibilities of directing and
interrogating mental functioning, using externally applied fields…”
(33). In the second volume of the report the research was evaluated as
"progressing according to the schedule or in advance" and was supposed
to be terminated in 2010.
In the Soviet Russia the ongoing research in this area was completely
hidden from the public, but change of political system and actual use of
this equipment during the putsch against Gorbachov brought this subject
to newspapers headlines. According to Russian daily newspapers, during
the failed coup d'etat against Gorbachov, General Kobets warned the
defenders of the Russian White House that mind control technology could
be used against them. After the putsch, respected Russian scientist
Victor Sedlecki published a statement in the Russian daily Komsomolskaya
Pravda that psychotronic biogenerators were mass produced in the Soviet
Union and were used during the failed coup d'etat [7], but failed to
succeed due to the inexperience of the personel who operated them. In
the following spree of articles on the subject of mind control, the
experiment was published where manipulation of masses of people by
microwave radiation was performed. Already in 1974, after successful
testing on a military unit in Novosibirsk, the installation Radioson (Radiosleep)
was registered with the Government Committee on the Matters of
Inventions and Discoveries of the USSR, described as a method of
induction of sleep by means of radio waves. Apparently, in 1974, the
entire military unit was put to sleep (5).
In the book “Low Intensity Conflict and Modern Technology” (18), Captain
Tyler also wrote: “Because of the many parameters involved and the
apparent specificity of each parameter, one can tailor a specific
response. The ability to have this kind of flexibility provides an
enormous range of options to the user. It opens the door for providing
an appropriate response in warfare, be it conventional or
unconventional” (18). If you object that the range of frequencies in
which the human nervous system works is too narrow to provide for such a
wide choice of reactions, Capt. Tyler writes: “There are unconfirmed
reports that change of 0.01 Hz can make a difference.” Since many
activities of human brain are represented by different sequences of
frequencies, this provides for further large choices.
At the end of 1994 the first tests of the most powerful radar system in
the world were carried out in Alaska. This year its power should reach
10 billion watts and later 100 billion watts. The main features of the
system include its ability to heat the ionosphere and in this way change
the altitude of the ionosphere. By this kind of manipulation of the
ionosphere, it is possible to bounce the electromagnetic waves back from
the ionosphere to whichever region of the planet one wishes to target.
According to the official information by the U.S. government the system
HAARP is designed for scientific research. However, there are too many
facts suggesting that the major reason for its construction are military
purposes. The main patent of Bernard J. Eastlund (number 4,686,605)
proposes the use of the system for destruction of navigation systems of
airplanes and missiles wherever in the atmosphere they might be, and for
interference with all communication systems anywhere on the planet, and
the global weather control. Other patents connected with the system
propose the use of the system for induction of detonations in the extent
of nuclear explosions and other military uses (33).
Evidently, the warning of Russian intelligence agency FAPSI to the
Russian government and the article in the Russian daily “Segodnya” were
direct recations to the installation of the U.S. HAARP system. The HAARP
system can start pulsing microwave radiation with one thousandth of one
Hertz and this means that, when raising pulsing frequencies, it can
change pulses of microwave radiations by one thousandths of one Hertz
and can control the activity of human brain in frequencies from 1 to 100
Hertz which are crucial for functioning of human nervous system. In June
1995, Michael Persinger, who apparently worked on the American Navy's
project of non-lethal electromagnetic weapons “Sleeping Beauty”,
published, in a scientific magazine Perception and Motor Skills the
article where he states: “the technical capability to influence directly
the major portion of the approximately six billion brains of the human
species without mediation through classical sensory modalities by
generating neural information within a physical medium within which all
members of the species are immersed… is now marginally feasible” (34).
John B. Alexander, who later became the Director of Non-lethal Programs
in Los Alamos National Laboratory, wrote in his article in the Military
Review in the year 1980: “whoever makes the first major breakthrough in
this field will have a quantum lead over his opponent, an advantage
similar to sole possession of nuclear weapons” (35). Samuel Koslov, a
leading personality of the Pandora project that was dedicated to
research of effects of microwave radiation on humans, and a researcher
at the John Hopkins University, in his closing speech at the conference
on Nonlinear Electrodynamics in Biological Systems in 1984, said that
the conference had proven that the external electric fields can “become
a key to the cellular control console. The implications, social,
economic, and even military are enormous.” Koslov went on: “If much of
what we have heard is indeed correct, it may be not less significant to
the nation than the prospects that faced the physics community in 1939
when the long-time predicted fissionability of the nucleus was actually
demonstrated. You may recall the famous letter of Albert Einstein to
President Roosvelt. When we’re in a position to do so in terms of our
proofs, I would propose that an analogous letter is required” (26).
It is this perspective, of the revolutionary nature of these scientific
developments, that gives us the title, “Revolution in Military Affairs
and Conflict Short of War”, of a book published by the Strategic Studies
Institute at the U.S. Army War College in 1994 (36). Since the national
security information is in question, the book cannot tell the readers
what technology exactly is making this revolution feasible. From the
beginning the authors were aware that the use of this technology may run
counter to basic moral and political values of the American society, and
in consequence the revolution in military affairs would require a moral
and political revolution to come first: ”In the pre-RMA days,
psychological operations and psychological warfare were primitive. As
they advanced into the electronic and bioelectronic era, it was
necessary to rethink our ethical prohibitions on manipulating the minds
of enemies (and potential enemies) both international and domestic...
Through persistent efforts and very sophisticated domestic
”consciousness raising”, old-fashioned notions of personal privacy and
national sovereignty changed.” Since it is difficult for them to imagine
that the American society would accept the ethical and political
revolution that would deprive the citizen of his privacy, they develop a
scenario of events which would lead the American political leaders to
back this revolution. The scenario is placed into the year 2000, and is
based on the situation of growing terrorism, drug trafficking and
criminality. In the document Rebuilding Americas Defenses, backed by the
past U.S. government, we read: “To preserve American military
preeminence in the coming decades, the Department of Defense must … seek
to exploit the emerging revolution in military affairs … Further, the
process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is
likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event –
like a new Pearl Harbor” (ref. 13, pg. 51). Was it by accident that in
2001 a massive terrorist attack ocurred in the USA facilitated by
questionable work of U.S. intelligence services and followed by anthrax
attacks where the only indicted scientist, Bruce Ivins, did not have the
technical means and scientific knowledge to turn the anthrax spores into
a deadly aerosol which was used and that those two attacks were followed
by an assault on privacy of U.S. Citizens and international law?
The scenario goes on: “The president was thus amenable to the use of the
sort of psychotechnology which formed the core of the RMA (revolution in
military affairs) in conflict short of war ... As technology changed the
way force was applied, things such as personal courage, face-to-face
leadership, and the ‘warfighter’ mentality became irrelevant.” So the
psychotechnology, which formed the core of the RMA, provided new methods
for influencing the psyche of the adversary, in place of the classical
strategy to make him fear his death. The book goes on: “Potential or
possible supporters of the insurgency around the world were identified
using the comprehensive Interagency Integrated Database. These were
categorized as ‘potential’ or ‘active’, with sophisticated personality
simulations used to develop, tailor and focus psychological campaigns
for each. There is also potential for defensive psychotechnology such as
‘strategic personality simulations’ to aid national security decision
makers.” (See Norman D. Livergood and Stephen D. Williams, “Strategic
Personality Simulation: A New Strategic Concept”, unpublished draft
paper, Carlisle Barracks, PAK: U.S. Army War College, 1994). Human
behovior and thinking is substantially controlled by emotions. If
simulated emotions are broadcasted into somebody’s nervous system they
will orient his thinking and behavior. Thoughts are another organizer of
human behavior and personal thoughts can be overridden by ultrasound
messages. In other words if there was, for example, a new Jesus Christ,
U.S. agencies would simply engineer his personality to make sure he
would not introduce any cultural changes. Once the strategy of
computerized personality simulation is applied, the unfolding of human
history will be totally controlled by elites having exclusive access to
those technologies. The conclusion of the authors was: “Whether we opt
for revolution or evolution, change will occur.”
The concept of the “strategic personality stimulation” is probably
tested on some of the people in the USA who claim to be mind control
experiments victims, whose number, rapidly growing after 9/11 attacks,
inspired the article in Washington Post, entitled “Mind Games” (31) in
2007. Cheryl Welsh, the director of the American organization Mind
Justice (38) claims that she has received over 2500 complaints from U.S.
citizens. Though some of those people may be mentally ill, many of them
defend themselves in a rational way that suggests that they may be
mentally sound. The same situation is in Russia. Russian politician
Vladimir Lopatin even admitted nonconsensual human-subject experiments
had been conducted in Russia, when he wrote in the quoted book:
“Compensation of damages and losses connected with social rehabilitation
of persons suffering from destructive informational influence must be
realized in legal trial…” (14). Growing numbers of complaints are coming
as well from China and Japan (over 200).
The European Parliament reacted to the installation of HAARP system by
calling for “an international convention introducing a global ban on all
developments and deployments of weapons which might enable any form of
manipulation of human beings” (15, Paragraph 27). The body of the
European Parliament STOA (Scientific and Technolgical Options
Assessment) in the document “Crowd Control Technologies”, stated that
„some of these concerns… have been more specifically covered by the
resolution on legal aspects of military activities passed at the meeting
of the EP_s Foreign Affairs, Security and defence Policy which called
for an international convention and global ban on all research and
development , whether civilian or military , which seeks to apply
knowledge of the chemical, electrical, sound vibration or other
functioning of the human brain to the development of weapons which might
enable any form of manipulation of human beings, including a ban on any
actual or possible deployment of such systems. (40, pg CII, ref. 369).
The „actual“ deployment of those means confirmed US Congressman Dennis
J. Kucinich, the author of a Bill introduced into the US Congress in
October 2001 proposing a ban on the deployment of “mind control”
weapons, when he was quoted to assert that those weapons actually exist
and “those people who control them are deadly serious and intend to use
them, if we don't stop the weaponisation of space” (10).
Electromagnetic technology enabling remote control of the functioning of
human organism is subjected to National Security Information law in the
USA (8) and all technologies enabling access to human brain are subject
to the same law in the Russian Federation (9). Under such conditions,
the mass media cannot fully disclose the existence and capacities of
those technologies and world public cannot be engaged in favour of a ban
on the use of such capabilities. The ownership of those technologies
gives opportunity to governments to use them against individuals (and
eventually against masses), without giving them any access to any legal
remedy. The concept of the world respecting freedom and human rights is
fundamentally corrupted in this way. In November 2000 the Committee on
Security of the Russian State Duma stated that capabilities enabling
remote control of human nervous system or the remote infliction of
health impairment are available to many modern governments (3). This was
confirmed by the article from the U.S. army weekly Defense News stating
that mind control technologies were used by the Israelis against the
Palestinians (12).
Evidently the secret arms race among the world governments may continue
until the information war actually breaks out. V. Lopatin, in the book “Psychotronic
Weapon and the Security of Russia”, stated that psychotronic war is, as
a matter of fact, “already taking place without declaration of war”. In
this way the human world may sink into some kind of virtual reality
where the independence of human thinking, feeling and decision making
will be destroyed as a part of an “information war” or, in the worst
case, into the reality where large masses of people will be killed, and
unlike the aftermath of the deployment of nuclear weapons, the planet
will still remain inhabitable for the survivors.
With emerging energetic and climate crises either the next world war
could erupt, or the means of remote manipulation of human brains and
organisms could be applied to control dissatisfied citizens. In the
conclusion of the Committee on Security of the Russian State Duma it is
stated: “Phone lines, heating and sewer pipes, TVs, fire signalisation
can be used as transmitting antennas” (3). Our elected democratic
representatives are responsible for foreseeing the emerging crises and
preventing them from happening by appropriate measures. However, they do
not have mandate from citizens to allow those crises to happen, and then
use technologies of mind manipulation to do away with citizen’s
dissatisfaction. If this technology is once used against citizens it is
questionable whether true democracy will be restored one day. The
countries with the most advanced military technologies include the USA,
which has never proposed any international initiative aimed at securing
the ban of technologies enabling the remote control of human beings.
According to the study “Crowd Control Technologies” published by the
European Parliament’s STOA office, the USA are the major promoter of the
use of those arms. (In fact, it was principally the efforts of the USA
government to persuade this outcome that ensured the inclusion in NATO
military doctrine of non-lethal technology.) The STOA states: “In
October 1999 NATO announced a new policy on non-lethal weapons and their
place in allied arsenals”; and “In 1996 non-lethal tools identified by
the U.S. Army included… directed energy systems” and “radio frequency
weapons” (40).
According to the Russian government intelligence agency FAPSI, in the
last 15 years, the U.S. expenses on the development and acquisition of
the means of informational war grew fourfold and at the present time
they occupy the first place among all military programs (17),(3). Though
there are concepts of informational warfare other than the remote
control of human beings, the unwillingnes of the USA to engage in the
negotiations aimed at the ban of the manipulation of human brains
suggests an intention to use those means in internal as well as in
international affairs. If the USA achieve essential military preeminence
in this area and if no global ban of the use of those technologies
against civilians is negotiated, the USA may become a world totalitarian
superpower of the new type.
So far the only government who made a small step toward the ban of those
technologies is the Russian Federation where the addendum to the article
6 of the Russian Federation law “On Weapons” was approved on July 26,
2001. The legislation states: “within the territory of the Russian
Federation is prohibited the circulation of weapons and other objects …
the effects of the operation of which are based on the use of
electromagnetic, light, thermal, infra-sonic or ultra-sonic
radiations…”. Besides omitting the use of the term “psychotronic energy”
that both Lopatin and Kucinich used, the Russian legislation does not
provide any means for Russian citizens to defend themselves against the
use of those weapons. Nor is there any compulsion upon the police or
public health organizations to set up teams capable of detecting
radiation that was enabling remote manipulation of human body and
nervous system, or the source of such radiation. Nor does this
legislation prohibit Russian government agencies from the use of such
technology against their own citizens. In the USA alone, some of the
federal states have enacted in their laws on firearms, new standards on
electric and electromagnetic weapons (Michigan in 2003, Massachusetts in
2004, Maine in 2005). Sanctions go from 15 years in jail to life
imprisonment, identically with weapons of mass destruction. As in
Russia, those laws do not provide for the defense of citizens against
the use of those weapons by government agencies.
On February 25, 2009 Deputy Chief of General Staff of Russian Army,
Anatoli Nogovicyn, stated that within 2 or 3 years a full fledged war in
informational sphere, including “information-psychlogical influence on
population and military units” may break out (39). So far politicians
(especially in the USA) have not shown responsible intention to take
action to stop this new arms race, which threatens to place human beings
in a position subsidiary to machines and to destroy democracy.
Humanitarian organizations apparently do not dare to challenge this
National Security Information (on several occasions Amnesty
International and Human Rights Watch have refused to engage with this
issue). Under such circumstances, it is left to citizens themselves to
organize defense of their freedoms and elementary human rights, before
those technologies are used at war or to suppress their dissatisfaction
with governments who failed to prevent the emerging crises. They should
coordinate their efforts internationally if they want to succeed.
References:
1)
http://web.iol.cz/mhzzrz
- Russian original - “Riders of Psychotronic”,
concise English translation of "Riders of Psychotronic Apocalypse"
at -
http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Campus/2289/webpage.htm
2)
http://web.iol.cz/mhzzrz - Russian
original: “Zombeing Bluff or” – concise English translation of the
article "The
Project Zombie is a Bluff or…?" -
http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Campus/2289/webpage.htm
3) see Russian original “Dokument” -
http://web.iol.cz/mhzzrz, translation –
“State Duma”
-http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Campus/2289/webpage.htm
4)
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/r?c107:chemtrails
5)
http://web.iol.cz/mhzzrz - Russian
original “Installation Radiosleep”,
concise English translation
http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Campus/2289/webpage.htm
- "Installation Radiosleep"
6)
http://www.mindjustice.org/russian.pdf
pg. 27-37 concise overview of the book other excerpts
you will find at the address
http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Campus/2289/webpage.htm
7) Russian original -
http://web.io.cz.mhzzrz
: “Authors of Project Zombie”,
concise English translation -
http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Campus/2289/webpage.htm
- "Authors of Project Zombie Discovered in
Kiev".
8)
http://web.iol.cz/mhzzrz - see
memorandum of the Department of the Air Force, Assembly State of New
York and Communicating
via the Microwave Auditory Effect or article „Mind Games“ in
Washington Post from January 2006, where an experiment
with microwave transmission of spoken phrases into the human
brain was published as well as the fact
that this technology is subject to the National Security
Information law
9)
http://web.iol.cz/mhzzrz
- Russian original: “Secret
Weapon in Action” -
concise translation "Secret Superweapon in Action":
http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Campus/2289/webpage.htm
10) see the article
from Berkeley Daily Planet"
http://www.berkeleydaily.org/text/article.cfm?issue=06-03-05&storyID=21550
11)
http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Campus/2289/webpage.htm
12)
http://web.iol.cz/mhzzrz - Israel Fields
Means to Suppress Palestinian Violence
13)
http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf
, pg. 4
14)
http://www.mindjustice.org/russian.pdf
pg. 36, or concise English translation of the book „Psychotronic Weapon
and the Security of Russia“
at
http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Campus/2289/webpage.htm
15) Resolution on the environment, security and foreign policy
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/pv2/pv2?
16) Doctrine of the Informational Security of the Russian Federation
there see pg. 3 -
Types of Threats to the Informational Security of the Russian
Federation)
http://www.medialaw.ru/e_pages/laws/project/d2-4.htm
17) See ref. 16, pg. 19,
“The International Cooperation of the
Russian Federation
in the Field of Ensuring Information Security"
18) Low Intensity Conflict and Modern
Technology, ed. Lt.Col. J. Dean, USAF, Air University Press,
Center for Aerospace Doctrine, Research and Education,
Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama, June 1986
(on Internet the site exists, but can not be found)
19) Francis H. Crick: The Astonishing Hypothesis.
The Scientific Search for the Soul, Simon and Schuster,
London, 1994, U.K.
20) Wolf Singer:
The Formation of Representations in the Cerebral Cortex, 1992,
Editor: Arzneimittelinformation/Medizinische
redaktion, Schering, Germany, ISSN 0940-9300
21) Journal of Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology,
supplement no. 45, 1996,
“Continuous Wave-Form Analysis”, page 64
22) John Marks: The CIA and Mind Control - the Search for Manchurian
Candidate, USA, 1988,
ISBN 0-440-20137-3
23) James C. Lin: Microwave Auditory Effects and Applications, Charles
C. Thomas publisher,
Springfield, Illinois, USA, ISBN 0-398-03704-3,
(experiments by McAffee conducted in 1961, 1962 and
1970)
24) Emerging Electromagnetic Medicine, 1990, conference proceedings
25) Critere d'hygiene de l'environment, frequence radioelectric et
hyperfrequences, World Health Organization,
Geneve, Switzerland, 1981
26) Nonlinear
Electrodynamics in Biological Systems, ed. Ross Adey,
proceedings of the conference, Plenum
Press, New York, London, 1984
27) magazine OMNI, February 1985, Kathleen McAuliffe "The Mind Fields"
28) Allan H. Frey, 1962, Human Auditory System Response to Modulated
Electromagnetic Energy,
Journal of Aplied Physiology, 17/4, pg. 689 – 692 -
http://jap.physiology.org/cgi/content/abstract/17/4/689
E..M. Taylor. B-. Ashelman, 1974, Analysis of Central
Nervous System
Involvement in Microwave Auditory Effects, Brain
research, vol. 74, pg. 201 -206
J.L. Flanagan, 1961, Audibility of Periodic Pulses and
a Model for the Threshold,
Journal of Acoustic Society of America, vol. 33 (11),
pg. 1540 – 49 K.R. Foster, E.D. Finch, 1974,
Microwave Hearing: evidence for Thermoacoustic Auditory
Stimulation by Pulsed Microwaves,
Science, vol. 185, pg. 256 -258
29) Don R. Justesen, 1975, Microwaves and Behavior, American
Psychologist, March 1975, pg. 391
30) Dr. Robert Becker: Body Electric: Electromagnetism and the
Foundation of Life,
William Morrow and comp., New York, 1985
31)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/10/AR2007011001399_pf.html
32) Robert Becker: Cross Currents, The Startling Effects of
Electromagnetic Radiation on Your Health,
1991, Bloomsberry Publishing, London, Great Brittain,
ISBN 0-7475-0761-9
33) Dr. Nick Begich, Jeanne Maning: Angels Don't Play this HAARP,
Earthpulse Press, P.O. Box 393,
Anchorage, Alaska 99520, USA (on Internet you will find
the reference to the “Final Report…”
but the site can not be found)
34) M.A. Persinger: On the Possibility of Directly Accessing Every Human
brain by Electromagnetic Induction
of Fundamental Algorythms, Perception and Motor Skills,
june 1995, vol. 80, pg. 791 -799 -
http://www.mindcontrolforums.com/mindnet/mn165.htm
35) John B. Alexander: The New Mental Battelfield: Beam me up Spock,
Military Review, Dec. 1980
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_mindcon16.htm
36) Steven Metz, James Kievit, "The Revolution in
Military Affairs and Conflict Short of War,
U.S. Army War College, Strategic Studies Institute,
Carlisle Barracks, PA 17013-5050
http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/display.cfm?pubID=241
37) Mlada Fronta Dnes, March 28, 1997 (the Czech newspaper)
38)
http://www.mindjustice.com
39)
http://www.lenta.ru/news/2009/02/25/strategy/
40) Working document for STOA panel of the European Parliament entitled
“Crowd Control Technologies” -
http://www.europarl.eu.int/stoa/publications/studies/19991401a_en.pdf
41) Jose M. R. Delgado: Physical Control of the
Mind, Toward a Psychocivilized Society, 1969, USA"
42) Russian weekly “Argumenty I Fakty”, number 32, August 2003,
article title: “Versii ubiistva generala Rokhlina”
(Versions of Murder of General Rokhlin)
43) Walter J. Freeman: Mass Action in the Nervous System, Academic
Press, New York,
San Francisco, London, 1975
* Edited by John Allman and Rudy Andria
September 13, 2009 >
Top
|
Analysis
|
|
