Indian Politicians Unfit for Democracy! by Rajinder Puri SignUp
Boloji.com
Boloji
Home Kabir Poetry Blogs BoloKids Writers Contribute Search Contact Site Map Advertise RSS Login Register
Boloji
Channels

In Focus

Analysis
Cartoons
Education
Environment
Going Inner
Opinion
Photo Essays

Columns

A Bystander's Diary
Business
My Word
PlainSpeak
Random Thoughts

Our Heritage

Architecture
Astrology
Ayurveda
Buddhism
Cinema
Culture
Dances
Festivals
Hinduism
History
People
Places
Sikhism
Spirituality
Vastu
Vithika

Society & Lifestyle

Family Matters
Health
Parenting
Perspective
Recipes
Society
Teens
Women

Creative Writings

Book Reviews
Ghalib's Corner
Humor
Individuality
Literary Shelf
Love Letters
Memoirs
Musings
Quotes
Ramblings
Stories
Travelogues
Workshop

Computing

CC++
Computing Articles
Flash
Internet Security
Java
Linux
Networking
My Word Share This Page
Indian Politicians Unfit for Democracy!
by Rajinder Puri Bookmark and Share
 

Mercifully Act One of the Yeddyurappa drama is over. It reinforced a paradoxical truth. While the people of India yearn for democracy, the politicians who rule them are abysmally unfit to deliver it. It is fashionable for analysts and politicians to say that people are responsible for corruption and misgovernance because they vote for the parties that govern them. This argument is fallacious.

If the political parties continue to rape the basic tenets of democracy the system will collapse.

~*~

When a case of corruption is exposed how do political parties and even the media react? To determine the culpability of the minister concerned there is searching debate and inquiry about whether the minister had his hand in the till, and whether he was aware of what was going on when the scam occurred. How odd!

Ordinary people cannot be confused with the elite that are largely responsible for creating a society’s ruling class. Ordinary people cannot be expected to perform the functions of rulers. They can only vote for the best option available. Whenever any genuine alternative has been presented to the Indian people they have exercised their vote sensibly. Tragically, almost invariably there is no real option presented to them. What for example is the qualitative difference between Mayawati, Mulayam Singh, Congress and BJP in UP? Denied an alternative, people vote for caste, money and immediate personal gain.

The pathetic ignorance of basic democratic functioning displayed by politicians was glaringly exposed during the recent fiasco that occurred in Karnataka. Chief Minister Yeddyurappa was indicted by Lok Ayukta Santosh Hegde’s report. Overlook for the moment the distorted partisan nature of the report which conveniently ignored corruption of Congress ex-chief ministers and focused only on two non-Congress chief ministers including the present incumbent. Mr. Hegde’s unprofessional approach in the manner that the report was leaked and his wholly unconvincing explanation that his 25,228 page report did not deal with any Congress chief minister because he wanted to focus on “the present and not on the past” deserves separate treatment. Regardless of the comparative degree of corruption displayed by successive chief ministers in Karnataka it is undeniable that Mr. Yeddyurappa deserved to resign.

That is where the absence of normal democratic functioning was revealed by the leaders of the BJP. To score debating points against rival factions within the party there was a virtual running commentary leaked to the media on the inner party parleys related to the crisis. The terms insisted upon by Mr. Yeddyurappa for resigning, the possible successors to replace him, the push and pull of rival factions about who should succeed – all this was almost gleefully leaked to the press by BJP leaders themselves. Mr. Yeddyurappa’s approach to the RSS was heavily publicized. Eventually Mr. Yeddyurappa and the central leadership of the party reached accommodation through an uneasy compromise under the watchful eyes of the media. The concerns of the central leaders and the outgoing chief minister were outlined to the press in detail.

Now consider how a healthy democratic party would have actually dealt with the crisis. Behind closed doors without briefing the press the central leadership would have persuaded Mr. Yeddyurappa with logic to argue his inevitable resignation. Mr. Yeddyurappa could have shared some of his legitimate concerns about the party’s future and steps to safeguard it. And then after informal and private confabulations related to the succession, the legislature party should have been summoned to elect the new leader. In that all the ground realities about who deserved to succeed would have been transparently and democratically resolved. Not once during the entire crisis did any leader remotely suggest that the MLAs should have a say in the succession. Mr. Yeddyurappa did parade his supporters in a show of strength which made more glaring the undemocratic nature of the succession struggle. 

This kind of haggling more suited to the vegetable market than to a democratic party is by no means confined to the BJP. The Congress should not gloat but merely recall the manner in which Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh was “appointed” to his post by Mrs. Sonia Gandhi which was later ratified by the parliamentary party. The truth is that the absence of basic democratic norms is not confined to succession struggles but pervades the entire conduct of political parties. Just one example related to an issue presently conspicuous should adequately illustrate this truth.

When a case of corruption is exposed how do political parties and even the media react? To determine the culpability of the minister concerned there is searching debate and inquiry about whether the minister had his hand in the till, and whether he was aware of what was going on when the scam occurred. How odd! If a minister is himself corrupt, or knowingly abets corruption, he should resign because he is complicit. If the minister is ignorant about what was going on in his ministry he should resign because he is incompetent. It matters not a jot to the public and to the nation whether corruption arises from greed or incompetence. The cost of corruption remains the same. That is why there is the well established principle of accepting constructive responsibility for lapses. It is the very foundation of democratic functioning. Were that principle observed in India almost all the present ministers would have had to resign a long, long time ago. That of course does not happen in any central or state government in India.

If the political parties continue to rape the basic tenets of democracy the system will collapse. I do not believe that it will happen. I believe that the nation’s instinct for survival will assert itself and create a situation in which the entire presently corrupt, venal and undemocratic ruling class will be thrown into the dustbin of history. A new generation with a new culture will replace it through an election to govern the nation and restore democracy. That is why one would urge young people to read the Constitution to understand its original intent. One would urge them to get acquainted with the basic norms of democracy. By not observing them democracy will remain hollow. They need to preserve the future of India. They need to protect their own future.  
 

31-Jul-2011
More by :  Rajinder Puri
 
Views: 2071
Article Comment Good and thought provoking article! I think every educated man should read this article!
G Swaminathan
08/07/2011
Article Comment There should a 'rapid course' on Akbar-Birbal, Krishna Dev Roy-Tenali Rama and Vikramaditya- Kalidas episodes to every elected members to understand how a state can be governed for the benefit of the people and what is the role of a head of the state.
I am afraid not even 5% of the elected leaders know the preamble of our Constitution, considered one of the best in the world.
Kumarendra Mallik
08/02/2011
Article Comment Though I agree with most of contents of the article,yet we are also responsible fr electing undeserving people.In the present Lok Sabha there are 76 MPs agaist whom serious cases relating to murder.rape.decoity and other such serious matters are pending.Still we have elected these people.Can we take refuse that no better alternative was available in such constituencies.We make a cry against corruption but we ourselves don't hesitate in paying someone for own work.Anna ji instead of sitting on fast for getting his demands met reg. Lokpal,which even if agreed to by the Govt. is not going to route out corruption.Instead he should start a public awakening revolution to educate people for exercising their right of franchise with open mind without any consideration of cast or cread.Further we should take an oath that we shall not pay any money to any one for our work ,come what may.We should not hesitate to report against any official who demands money.The system cannot be rectified overnight but a beginning has to be made.
P.C.Sharma
08/02/2011
Article Comment I enjoyed eading this exceelent write-up !

Yes, people vote reasonably when right options are given to them according to their level of understanding and knowledge.

I believe, with the right options, the information about the options and impact on national/state/municipal policies upon contestent's win also need to be rightly analysed and projected by media. Without this, a right candidate can be projected as wrong and a wrong candidate can be projected as right.

Because, an average person has little knowledge of wrong-doings and right-doings of the candidates.
-----------------------------------------

But I agree, upon unearthing a corruption scam or any other wrong doing, if 'reasonable resignation by responsible peron(s)' is maintained as general practice - whether or not the responsible person was involved/witness/ignorant; it would alone ensure a clean and efficient governance.
Simple solutions lead to success - this is a simple one, will bring success if implemented. 'how it can be implemented' is a diffeent question.
Dinesh Kumar Bohre
08/01/2011
Article Comment The Yeddy episode illustrates that the Indian democracy is caught between the devil of the ‘high command’ culture that devours regional leaders and the deep sea of ‘collective leadership’ that is undermined by the ‘caste satraps’. Yeddy would not have been half as brazen as he is, if not for his perceived Lingayat backing regardless. The proclivities of our politicians would only change as and when we, the people of India, can cross our emotional ‘caste’ boundaries.
BS Murthy
08/01/2011
 
Top | My Word







    A Bystander's Diary     Analysis     Architecture     Astrology     Ayurveda     Book Reviews
    Buddhism     Business     Cartoons     CC++     Cinema     Computing Articles
    Culture     Dances     Education     Environment     Family Matters     Festivals
    Flash     Ghalib's Corner     Going Inner     Health     Hinduism     History
    Humor     Individuality     Internet Security     Java     Linux     Literary Shelf
    Love Letters     Memoirs     Musings     My Word     Networking     Opinion
    Parenting     People     Perspective     Photo Essays     Places     PlainSpeak
    Quotes     Ramblings     Random Thoughts     Recipes     Sikhism     Society
    Spirituality     Stories     Teens     Travelogues     Vastu     Vithika
    Women     Workshop
RSS Feed RSS Feed Home | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Site Map
No part of this Internet site may be reproduced without prior written permission of the copyright holder.
Developed and Programmed by ekant solutions