Boloji.com - A Study in Diversity - News, Views, Analysis, Literature, Poetry, Features - Express Yourself SignUp
Boloji.com

Channels

In Focus

 
Analysis
Cartoons
Education
Environment
Opinion
Photo Essays
 
 

Columns

 
A Bystander's Diary
Business
My Word
PlainSpeak
Random Thoughts
 
 

Our Heritage

 
Architecture
Astrology
Ayurveda
Buddhism
Cinema
Culture
Dances
Festivals
Hinduism
History
People
Places
Sikhism
Spirituality
Vastu
Vithika
 
 

Society & Lifestyle

 
Family Matters
Health
Parenting
Perspective
Recipes
Society
Teens
Women
 
 

Creative Writings

 
Book Reviews
Ghalib's Corner
Humor
Individuality
Literary Shelf
Love Letters
Memoirs
Quotes
Stories
Travelogues
Workshop
 
 

Computing

 
Computing Articles
Flash
Internet Security
Java
Linux
Networking
 
 
Analysis Share This Page
Boss Anna or Brand Anna?
by Rajinder Puri Bookmark and Share

Undoubtedly sections within the Congress have launched a relentless campaign to discredit Mr. Anna Hazare’s movement. The credibility of the movement has undeniably dimmed. But the reason for that is not the tirade launched by Mr. Digvijay Singh among others. The government’s targeting of Mr. Hazare had in fact earned considerable public sympathy for the movement which was being perceived as the victim of official vendetta. The erosion of the movement’s credibility has arisen from the differences and attitudes displayed by Mr. Hazare’s Team members themselves. It may be granted that the Congress exaggerated the minor lapses committed by the Team members. But the response by the members to the allegations and exposures was not handled with requisite maturity. Worse, there surfaced open differences within the Team. Swami Agnivesh was dismissed. Mr. Santosh Hegde and Ms Medha Patkar display at times support that can best be described as ambivalent. To cap it all Mr. Hazare’s own flip flop is raising more than a few eyebrows.

Mr. Hazare had clearly indicated that he would question and possibly act against Mr. Prashant Bhushan for his views on Kashmir. Nothing visibly happened. After certain exposures against the Team members Mr. Hazare had said that the core group might be reconstructed and new members inducted. He entered into a maun vrat while a crucial meeting of the core group was held. The group unilaterally announced that all was well, the Team remained united and strong, no reconstruction of the Team was required and no new members would be inducted into the core group. Mr. Prashant Bhushan continues to be an important member of the core group. Surprisingly Mr. Hazare dittoed the group’s decision.

Now there emerges a new development that raises questions about Mr. Hazare’s own authority within the Team. His close confidant and official Internet blogger for the Team Mr. Raju Parulekar had on the eve of the last core group meeting written a letter to Mr. Hazare which was released to the press. In that letter Mr. Parulekar sought the disbanding of the Team and its reconstruction that would include new members. Mr. Parulekar accused the core group leaders of misleading Mr. Hazare. It was widely assumed that Mr. Parulekar’s written demand had the tacit blessing of Mr. Hazare.  After Mr. Hazare had endorsed the decisions of the core group he was questioned by the media about Mr. Parulekar’s letter. Mr. Hazare said: “I have not employed him or given him salary. How can he say all these things? I will ask him. I have not told him anything about this. If he has written anything like that I will take action.” 

Mr. Parulekar responded: “I will defend myself and will prove that whatever I wrote or said was with consent of Anna Hazare. The Team Anna Arvind (Kejriwal), Sisodia and Kiran Bedi are leading Anna towards a black hole and towards doom for their vested interests.” So who is speaking the truth, Mr. Hazare or Mr. Parulekar? Can Mr. Parulekar provide proof that he had indeed obtained Mr. Hazare’s consent before releasing the letter? Things are looking increasingly murky within Team Anna. Who is really calling the shots, Mr. Hazare or the core group leaders? If the public starts wondering about this one cannot blame either the government or Mr. Digvijay Singh. This is a controversy of the Team’s own making.
 

Share This:
05-Nov-2011
More by :  Rajinder Puri
 
Views: 939      Comments: 2

Comments on this Article

Comment . Anna's self-righteousness is getting obvious by each passing day

dadu
11/09/2011 05:58 AM

Comment It's clear now that Anna is a puppet, playing in politically motivated hands. He changes his statements every two hours. The depth of his moral power, on which he used to stand tall, has been diminished. Verbal violence, in which he often indulges, is the worst kind of violence because it is the originator of all other forms of violence.

Prof. Shubha Tiwari
11/06/2011 08:05 AM




Name *
Email ID
 (will not be published)
Comment
Verification Code*
Can't read? Reload
Please fill the above code for verification.
 
Top | Analysis



 
 
 
 
 
 
2018 All Rights Reserved
 
No part of this Internet site may be reproduced without prior written permission of the copyright holder
.