Boloji.com - A Study in Diversity - News, Views, Analysis, Literature, Poetry, Features - Express Yourself SignUp
Boloji.com

Channels

In Focus

 
Analysis
Cartoons
Education
Environment
Opinion
Photo Essays
 
 

Columns

 
A Bystander's Diary
Business
Random Thoughts
 
 

Our Heritage

 
Architecture
Astrology
Ayurveda
Buddhism
Cinema
Culture
Festivals
Hinduism
History
People
Places
Sikhism
Spirituality
 
 

Society & Lifestyle

 
Health
Parenting
Perspective
Recipes
Society
Teens
Women
 
 

Creative Writings

 
Book Reviews
Computing
Ghalib's Corner
Humor
Individuality
Literary Shelf
Love Letters
Memoirs
Quotes
Stories
Travelogues
Workshop
 
 
Analysis Share This Page
2G Scam: Go for the Jugular!
by Dr.Rajinder Puri Bookmark and Share

The Special Court has rejected the petition of Mr. Subramanian Swamy seeking to make Home Minister Mr. P Chidambaram a co-accused along with former Telecom Minister Mr. A Raja in the 2G Spectrum scam. The petition was tactically flawed. The desire to insulate the Prime Minister and single out Mr. Chidambaram was motivated. To accuse Mr. Chidambaram of being actually involved in corruption was arguably hasty. Ironically much stronger evidence exists of not actual corruption but of abetting corruption which is also a cognizable offence. However, that evidence involves not only Mr. Chidambaram but also the PM and his senior colleagues. Did that fact inhibit the petitioners?

If the government persists in clinging to office it makes mockery of basic democratic norms. Has not the time come for the extreme step of prosecuting the PM and his senior colleagues of abetting corruption?

I have repeatedly drawn attention to the constructive responsibility of individual ministers and to the collective responsibility of the cabinet to point out that the entire government deserve to face the consequences of this mega scam. 

Thus far the attempt has been limited to making Home Minister Mr. P Chidambaram a co-accused along with former Telecom Minister Mr. A Raja. But regardless of whether or not Mr. Chidambaram was a beneficiary of the corrupt deal the PM and his senior colleagues cannot escape the charge of abetting corruption which is a punishable offence. It is perhaps the soft corner for the PM that dissuaded the petitioners in this case from focusing on the open and shut case proving the cabinet’s abetment of Mr. Raja’s alleged corruption. 

To put it briefly, in a letter to the PM, Finance Minister Mr. Pranab Mukherjee drew attention to a note dated March 25, 2011 which was prepared with inputs from several ministries including Law, Finance and Telecom, as well as from the cabinet secretariat and the PMO. That note was circulated by the Cabinet Secretariat. The note made clear that after initially opposing Mr. Raja, then Finance Minister Mr. Chidambaram did not prevent him from going ahead with his policy of issuing the 2G licenses. In other words on March 25, 2011, if not earlier, the PM and his senior cabinet colleagues were aware of what Mr. Raja was doing. They took no action against him. On April 2, 2011 Mr. Raja was charge sheeted by the Supreme Court when no action had been taken against him by the government. According to Section Ten of the Prevention of Corruption Act this would amount to a clear case of abetting corruption. 

Section Ten of the Prevention of Corruption Act reads:

“Whoever, being a public servant, in respect of whom either of the offences defined in Section 8 or Section 9 (defrauding the state) is committed, abets the offence, whether or not that offence is committed in consequence of that abetment, shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which shall be not less than six months but which may extend to five years and shall also be liable to fine.”

Mr. Mukherjee’s note makes clear from the sequence of events revealed that the PM and his senior colleagues despite knowledge of Mr. Raja’s actions did nothing to prevent him.  

If the government persists in clinging to office it makes mockery of basic democratic norms. Has not the time come for the extreme step of prosecuting the PM and his senior colleagues of abetting corruption? That would assume of course that the opposition’s fight is against corruption and not against only Mr. Chidambaram. 
   

Share This:
04-Feb-2012
More by :  Dr. Rajinder Puri
 
Views: 1119      Comments: 1

Comments on this Article

Comment Dear Sir,

1.---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for drawing attention to this open truth about abetment to the offense - it is IRREFUTABLE.

I can't imagine on what lines one can defend in court that the whole cabinet and senior officials can defend themselves.

And I hope such an argument occurs in the court(s).

2. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

But even if such an argument comes up in court, which is otherwise irrefutable, can we expect a strong unbiased judgment from Court - even from SC ?

In fact, the court is empowered to take (suo motu) note of the above mentioned irrefutable fact to nail whole cabinet.

I am afraid, the democracy in India is weaken because of many reasons, one of them is strong imbalance among its pillars. Out of three, two pillars have leaned too much towards the third one and the third one has developed a distorted posture.

3. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I feel there is something else and something more than visible behind attack and defense of Mr. Chidambaram. When A. Raja and Mr. Maran are out and UPA is still intact, why Mr. Chidambaram’s exit will harm them ?

Dinesh Kumar Bohre
02/05/2012 13:39 PM




Name *
Email ID
 (will not be published)
Comment
Verification Code*
Can't read? Reload
Please fill the above code for verification.
 
Top | Analysis



 
 
 
 
 
 
2018 All Rights Reserved
 
No part of this Internet site may be reproduced without prior written permission of the copyright holder
.