Augusta Westland Corruption Why Government Must Cancel Deal! by Rajinder Puri SignUp
Boloji.com

Channels

In Focus

 
Analysis
Cartoons
Education
Environment
Opinion
Photo Essays
 
 

Columns

 
A Bystander's Diary
Business
Random Thoughts
 
 

Our Heritage

 
Architecture
Astrology
Ayurveda
Buddhism
Cinema
Culture
Festivals
Hinduism
History
People
Places
Sikhism
Spirituality
 
 

Society & Lifestyle

 
Health
Parenting
Perspective
Recipes
Society
Teens
Women
 
 

Creative Writings

 
Book Reviews
Computing
Ghalib's Corner
Humor
Individuality
Literary Shelf
Love Letters
Memoirs
Quotes
Stories
Travelogues
Workshop
 
 
Analysis Share This Page
Augusta Westland Corruption
Why Government Must Cancel Deal!
by Dr.Rajinder Puri Bookmark and Share

Recently the cabinet was in two minds whether or not to cancel the Augusta Westland helicopter deal in which serious corruption allegations have surfaced. Reportedly the Defence Ministry favoured cancellation while the Ministry of External Affairs was against it. Official sources even leaked to the media that Defence Minister Mr. AK Antony was threatening to resign. Subsequently Mr. Antony turned turtle and said that he would not resign but perform his duty as the Minister. He echoed the Prime Minister to assert that there was nothing to hide and he would face any debate in parliament. It matters little which side in the cabinet relented. What needs to be seen is what happens to the helicopter deal.

Experts have strenuously opined that the deal must not be canceled because that would further harm procurements that affect national security.

An opposite view may be considered.

Only if the deal is actually threatened would the international mafia see the writing on the wall. Only then would it expose the Indian collaborators, no matter how highly placed, in order to obtain its pound of flesh.

In the long term would it not be better to cleanse once and for all the system operated by a murky mafia that has monopolized not only defence contracts but all deals involving procurement from abroad? Reform is required in order to legitimize consultants allowed payment for services rendered in totally transparent fashion. Instead of paying commission that is a percentage of the contract it might be better to pay them a fixed fee negotiated at the outset. That would not create an incentive to enhance the quantum of the contract. One fee might be fixed for ongoing services and the remaining if the contract is obtained.

It is necessary to clean up the system if India is at all serious of expanding future trade. Mr. Antony therefore should not be deflected from his first impulse to cancel the deal. Instead of outright cancellation the government can put the decision on hold until preconditions are met.

Readers might recall that months before the arrest of the Italians connected to the deal this writer had demanded last October:

“There is one thing that the Indian government can do, and must do. It should cancel the contract with the Augusta Westland Company. After full information related to the case is made available the contract can be revived or renegotiated as events might dictate. The indemnity or penalty clause of the signed contract can be invoked by the government if necessary. In light of the information already available this is the least that the Defence Ministry must insist.”

I venture to suggest that had the government acted then the arrests in Italy would have occurred much earlier.

British Prime Minister Mr. David Cameron’s concerns are legitimate. Although the Augusta Westland Company operates in Britain it is owned by Italians. British concerns are related to continuance of the company’s operations in order to perpetuate employment of British workers who are doing a commendable job. The employment situation in Britain is critical. The Indian government should appreciate this and tell the Brits:

“Fine, we will not cancel the contract if you can ensure that the whole and credible truth regarding all the Indian recipients of kickbacks is revealed to us.”

Mr. Cameron if he puts his mind to it has enough leverage with Italy to deliver this. If Britain and India are to expand a mutually satisfying commercial and cultural partnership in the years ahead this must be done for sake of both nations.

Would the serious threat of cancellation work? I believe it would. Only if the deal is actually threatened would the international mafia see the writing on the wall. Only then would it expose the Indian collaborators, no matter how highly placed, in order to obtain its pound of flesh. Remember, kickbacks have already been paid. The mafia would not tolerate losing the deal altogether after paying the bribes. That is how hard headed members of the corruption mafia operate.
  

Share This:
20-Feb-2013
More by :  Dr. Rajinder Puri
 
Views: 1385      Comments: 0




Name *
Email ID
 (will not be published)
Comment
Characters
Verification Code*
Can't read? Reload
Please fill the above code for verification.
 
Top | Analysis



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2018 All Rights Reserved
 
No part of this Internet site may be reproduced without prior written permission of the copyright holder
.