Boloji.com - A Study in Diversity - News, Views, Analysis, Literature, Poetry, Features - Express Yourself SignUp
Boloji.com

Channels

In Focus

 
Analysis
Cartoons
Education
Environment
Opinion
Photo Essays
 
 

Columns

 
A Bystander's Diary
Business
My Word
PlainSpeak
Random Thoughts
 
 

Our Heritage

 
Architecture
Astrology
Ayurveda
Buddhism
Cinema
Culture
Dances
Festivals
Hinduism
History
People
Places
Sikhism
Spirituality
Vastu
Vithika
 
 

Society & Lifestyle

 
Family Matters
Health
Parenting
Perspective
Recipes
Society
Teens
Women
 
 

Creative Writings

 
Book Reviews
Ghalib's Corner
Humor
Individuality
Literary Shelf
Love Letters
Memoirs
Quotes
Stories
Travelogues
Workshop
 
 

Computing

 
Computing Articles
Flash
Internet Security
Java
Linux
Networking
 
 
Analysis Share This Page
EC: Moment of Truth
by Rajinder Puri Bookmark and Share


The crisis sparked by the recommendation of Chief Election Commissioner (CEC), N Gopalswamy, to the President of India that Election Commissioner (EC) Navin Chawla be relieved of his post due to partisanship has confronted the political system with its moment of truth. Forget the merits or demerits of the CEC's move. The issue is larger. 

The BJP had earlier petitioned for the removal of the EC on a similar charge of partisanship. The BJP naturally supports the CEC's demand that Chawla be removed from his post. It ridicules the government's right to decide the issue. The government is an interested party in the dispute. That is reasonable. The BJP claims that only the CEC's writ should be binding. 

However, the CEC's contention is being criticized by the UPA government for being politically motivated. In the event how can the CEC decide the issue when he himself is being accused of a motivated ruling? The government's objection is reasonable. 

So how can the issue be credibly resolved? The answer is obvious. The President of India should decide whether or not the CEC's recommendation should be accepted. No politician or jurist will dare state that. If the President can ignore the advice of the cabinet on this one issue the door will be opened for her to exercise the same right on a host of issues outside the normal advice on executive decisions tendered to her by the cabinet. In other words the President would then start to function according to the responsibilities and rights explicitly assigned to her in our written Constitution and through her oath of office. The wholly unwarranted description of the President as a ceremonial titular head will be exposed as a blatant distortion of our written Constitution. It matters little if a flawed Supreme Court judgment endorsed this mistaken view. Supreme Court judges are human. They have made untold errors through various rulings. At times the Supreme Court has overturned its own past rulings. 

The diminution of the President's role to that of the cabinet's dummy has destroyed some necessary checks to executive excess that fatally damage our political system. That is why effective governance is disappearing. That is why our political system is crumbling. That is why democracy is rapidly declining. Our explicit and unambiguous Constitution needs to be reinterpreted. It needs to be liberated from whimsically imposed conventions that have no bearing in law. The role of the President must be reappraised in the light of the Constitution's text. It may continue to be distorted by irrational and arbitrary assumptions of politicians only at grave peril to India's democracy.   

Share This:
01-Feb-2009
More by :  Rajinder Puri
 
Views: 1150      Comments: 0




Name *
Email ID
 (will not be published)
Comment
Verification Code*
Can't read? Reload
Please fill the above code for verification.
 
Top | Analysis



 
 
 
 
 
 
2018 All Rights Reserved
 
No part of this Internet site may be reproduced without prior written permission of the copyright holder
.