Was there an Aryan Invasion? by Kusum Choppra SignUp
Boloji.com

Channels

In Focus

 
Analysis
Cartoons
Education
Environment
Opinion
Photo Essays
 
 

Columns

 
A Bystander's Diary
Business
Random Thoughts
 
 

Our Heritage

 
Architecture
Astrology
Ayurveda
Buddhism
Cinema
Culture
Festivals
Hinduism
History
People
Places
Sikhism
Spirituality
 
 

Society & Lifestyle

 
Health
Parenting
Perspective
Recipes
Society
Teens
Women
 
 

Creative Writings

 
Book Reviews
Computing
Ghalib's Corner
Humor
Individuality
Literary Shelf
Love Letters
Memoirs
Quotes
Stories
Travelogues
Workshop
 
 
Random Thoughts Share This Page
Was there an Aryan Invasion?
by Kusum Choppra Bookmark and Share

How many have studied about “India’s Aryan Invasion” in school? Possibly everyone?

Recent research indicates that was perhaps an imperialist theory; a successful attempt at cultural imperialism, to prove the superiority of Occidental culture and to give the British an unholy cover for their presence in India at all -- that they were merely repeating what had been done in the hoary past.

It offered Occidental culture a false antiquity beyond ancient Vedic culture, and served to split India into a northern Aryan and a southern Dravidian culture that still festers. In short, an instrument for subjugation that negates the Dravidian culture being an early offshoot of the Vedic, through Agastya, and that there were migrations from India, across the Asian landmass into Europe up to Germany: “The Return of the Aryans” by Dr. Bhagwandas Gidwani.

Led by Max Mueller and other Christian scholars steeped in Biblical chronology, an arbitrary date of 1500 B C was chosen post The Great Flood, so that Vedic culture would be ‘learning’? from the ancestors of the Occident, rather than the other way round. It also served to shroud all the ancient Vedas, Upanishads, epics etc. as “myths” to allow questioning their validity.

A dark vs light skinned struggle was super imposed, as children of the sun and of the moon. No one asked why this Sun-Moon concept was not applied to Persian and Eygptian scriptures.

In his counter argument, scholar David Frawley draws attention to the faulty date mathematics and other contrary facts. "Vedic culture was created by primitive Central Asian nomads with horse drawn chariots and iron weapons that destroyed the Indus Valley Culture (IVC)."

But horses, weapons and chariots existed in the IVC too; they were a hoary tradition from pre-Vedic times. An Indus seal shows a spoked wheel, as used in chariots. In fact, chariots, endemic in the plains, would be cumbersome in the Central Asian passes.

The question arises: would nomads use chariots at all? The concept of nomads is those who are on the move, crossing mountains and deserts. For an “Aryan invasion”? Totally unsuitable.

Chariots were the vehicles of ancient urban cultures of flat rolling lands, such as North India’s plains provide galore. The IVC was largely a city culture of planned urban conglomerations … that would mean room for chariots as well, presumably. The Rig Veda mentions cities too; so did the histories of Egypt and Mesopotamia, long before the Occident refined into civilization.

Recent investigations indicate that the IVC was not decimated by enemies; rather, causes such as climate change or floods. Ditto, the end of Krishna’s famed Dwarka, now Bet Dwarka that reveal elaboration between IVC and the India the Greeks saw later. Those dates would expose an unbroken urban culture going back to the beginning of the IVC.

Kudos to Dr. Gidwani’s 1990s affirmation of the pre-historic antiquity of civilization in India, that answered questions left unanswered by the classic history taught in schools.

Share This:
14-May-2017
More by :  Kusum Choppra
 
Views: 278      Comments: 0




Name *
Email ID
 (will not be published)
Comment
Characters
Verification Code*
Can't read? Reload
Please fill the above code for verification.
 
Top | Random Thoughts



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2018 All Rights Reserved
 
No part of this Internet site may be reproduced without prior written permission of the copyright holder
.