|
|
||
|
Home | Hindi | Kabir | Poetry | Workshop | BoloKids | Writers | Contribute | Search | Contact | Share This Page! Shop Online |
|||
| Click & Connect : Prepaid International Calling Cards | |||
|
Dances of India
Dhananjaya states that Nritta is talalayaashrit. Dhanik goes one step ahead and says that Nritta is devoid of Abhinaya. It is this definition that we follow today. Bharata had recognized the pure and the interpretative element in dance because when the muni-s question him that when Nritta doesn't show the meaning or is not interpretative then what is the purpose of Nritta? Bharata says that Nritta adds beauty and grace to the whole presentation. Nritta-Tandava and Lasya In the Natyasastra the dance taught by Siva's disciple has been termed as Tandava. Abhinava Gupta states that "Tandavam iti sarvam nrittamucyate". Thus Abhinava Gupta means Tandava and Nritta are synonymous. He further divides them into Sukumara and Uddhata. He also states that Sukumara may have some Uddhata element and Uddhata may have some Sukumara element. Abhinava Gupta has also laid out the seven stages for the development of Nritta. These are –
Saradatanaya states that Nritta is one which is executed by Karana-s and Angahara-s . He doesn't explicitly state that Tandava and Lasya are a part of Nritta. The Gita which contains Uddhata Karana, Angahara with the Arabhati vritti is "Tandava". No other treatise tries to include the vritti-s while explaining the elements of Nritta. He divides the Tandava into Chanda, Ucchanda and Prachanda. He defines Lasya as the Gita which contains lalit angahara in lalit laya infused with the Kaishiki vritti. Sarangdeva is very clear as to what Nritta is and what could be its divisions and it's types. He says Nritta is movements of various parts of the body which is not suggestive of any particular meaning. He divides this into two elements Tandava and Lasya. He again makes a threefold division on the basis of its execution .
But it is Nandikeshvara who makes a compact and unique classification that covers all the aspects of Nritta present in our ancient treatises. He divides it into two -Tandava and Lasya and again further making a division of these into two -Margi and Deshi Nritta. Under the margi category of Lasya is Shuddha Lasya. Nandikeshvara doesn't define what is Shuddha Lasya and directly lays down the deshi types. The deshi type has been classified into five types. These look more like the popular forms prevalent in those times.
Nandikeshvara next talks about the Karana-s and Cari-s to be used in them . This is again a pointer to how the karana-s and Angahara-s, were adopted in the desi Nritta forms. Although some Karana-s mentioned don't seem to exist, example - In Prenkhani the Sankh and the Samotsarita mandala Cari should be used. In Gondali Narayan karan and Mattali Cari is to be used. It is the Tandava chapter which Nandikeshvara talks about gives a great deal of information on how Karana-s and Angahara-s were adopted and set in tala on syllables. In Bharata's Natyasastra we only find a mention about Angahara-s set according to tryasra and Caturasra tala. The Tandava element is divided into
The Margi consists of seven types of Bhraman-s. Each Bhramana consists of Gati-s, Karana-s, chari-s. For each gati he has prescribed a separate tala, but no tala has been prescribed for the Karana-s or Cari-s. Each tala has been prescribed some specific sabda (bol-sor sollu). Example:
It is very difficult to derive any specific meaning. But one thing which we can definitely relate is, like today we follow the interplay of jati-s and tala-s in any Nritta item, this concept was already present and even extensive use of shollu-s (which has been called as Shabda Natya) was practiced. The desi Tandava is nothing but an offshoot of Margi but using desi Karana-s and chari-s and not those given in the Natyasastra. There could be another classification which could be made on the basis of the the treatise Nartana Nirnaya.
To cite an example – Suddhaneri - which consists of chatusra sthanaka, rasa tala, vilamba laya, rathacakra cari. There seems to have grown lot of stress on tala, laya, yati. Urupa-s are an open proof. There is even more complex tala notation which have been termed as Kuvada-s. They seem to be small items of tala groups. It also specifies whether that Kuvada has to be performed in a group or a solo performance . Example – Nagabandha Kuvada - Taking up four tala-s with equal number of matra-s, and having segments, each tala divisible into three equal segments terminating into laghu. But why is it called a Nagabandha? Because it involves three dancers who continuously exchange their mutual position in movement thus giving rise to a serpentine pattern. Lasyanga as Nritta
Nritta as of today
– Parimal
Phadke Parimal Phadke is a visiting lecturer for the department of Center for Performing Arts, University of Pune. |
|
|
|
|
Analysis |
Architecture |
Astrology |
Ayurveda |
Book Reviews |
Buddhism |
Cartoons | Cinema |
Computing |
Culture |
Dances |
|
Home | Hindi | Bolography | BoloKids | Kabir | Poetry | Quotes | Workshop | Writers | Contribute | Search | Contact |
|
|