|
|
Environment
Distressed Habitation
by VK Joshi

People
of habitats that have witnessed destruction en-mass develop a peculiar
psyche. My first encounter nearly three and half decades ago, with such
a psyche was at a small way-side railway station near Hoshiarpur in
Punjab. The village overlooking the railway station, was situated on a
large mound with a boundary wall all around, perhaps relicts of an old
fort! The clock struck five in the evening and the place became
deserted. An eerie silence prevailed. Vultures came from no where and
sat on the boundary wall, peering eagerly towards the railway line. Next
evening again the same scene was repeated. The station master, a
sardarji in his late fifties told me that one fateful evening in August
1947, train loads of passengers were butchered at this place. Since then
no one ventures out in the evening and the vultures return daily in the
hope of more dead bodies to scavenge.
Parting is painful. Unexpected death due to a disaster hurts more.
Imagine the mental condition of the near and dear ones of those 73,000
who perished in the earthquake in Kashmir last year! The women, innocent
children and old men are distressed beyond imagination.
Earthquake leaves in its wake a heavy trail of destruction. People lose
their families, dwellings, belongings, bread-winners, bread and jobs
too. Earthquake does not spare anyone, rich or poor, developed or
developing nation. Developed countries like USA and Japan have learnt
lessons from repeated earthquakes and have evolved techniques and
methods to obviate loss of life. Places like schools and mosques where
people congregate are most vulnerable. The Republic Day of 2001 will
remain for ever a black day in the minds of the parents who lost their
children in Anjar in Gujarat. These 400 innocent lives were lost just
because they had assembled to take part in the parade.
The mobile sub-continent has had several major earthquakes in the
history, a part of the record of which is tabled here to show how many
lives have been extinguished prematurely.
|
Year |
Location |
Magnitude |
Intensity |
No. of lives
lost |
|
1618 |
Bombay |
- |
- |
2000 |
|
1720 |
Delhi |
6.5 |
- |
2000 |
|
1737 |
Bengal |
- |
- |
3000 |
|
1803 |
Mathura |
6.5 |
- |
Hundreds,
shock felt up to Calcutta |
|
1803 |
Kumaon |
6.5 |
- |
200-300 |
|
1819 |
Kutch |
8.0 |
XI |
Thousands,
chief towns of Tera, Kathara and Mothala razed to the ground. |
|
1828 |
Srinagar |
6.0 |
- |
1000 |
|
1833 |
Bihar |
7.7 |
X |
Hundreds |
|
1848 |
Mt.Abu,
Rajasthan |
6.0 |
- |
Few people
killed |
|
1869 |
Assam |
7.5 |
- |
Affected an
area of 2,50,000 Sq. miles. |
|
1885 |
Srinagar |
7.0 |
- |
600 |
|
1897 |
Shillong |
8.7 |
XII |
1600 |
|
1905 |
Kangra |
8.0 |
XI |
20,000 |
|
1906 |
Himachal
Pradesh |
7.0 |
- |
Heavy damage |
|
1916 |
Nepal |
7.5 |
- |
All houses at
Dharchula in
Pithoragarh, India
collapsed |
|
1918 |
Assam |
7.6 |
- |
Heavy damage |
|
1930 |
Dhubri,
Meghalaya |
7.1 |
IX |
Heavy damage
in Dhubri. |
|
1934 |
Bihar,
Nepal |
8.3 |
XI |
20,000 |
|
1935 |
Quetta,
Pakistan |
7.5 |
IX |
25,000 |
|
1941 |
Andaman |
8.1 |
X |
Very heavy
damage |
|
1947 |
Dibrugarh |
7.8 |
- |
Heavy damage |
|
1950 |
Assam |
8.6 |
XII |
1500 |
|
1952 |
Northeast
India |
7.5 |
- |
Heavy damage |
|
1956 |
Bulandshahar,
U.P. |
6.7 |
VIII |
Many killed |
|
1956 |
Anjar, Gujarat |
7.0 |
VIII |
Hundreds of
people killed |
|
1958 |
Kapkote, Uttaranchal |
6.3 |
VIII |
Hundreds of
people killed |
|
1967 |
Koyna,
Maharashtra |
6.1 |
VIII |
200, Koyna
Nagar razed to ground |
|
1969 |
Bhadrachalam |
6.5 |
I |
Heavy
damage |
|
1975 |
Kinnaur, H.P. |
6.2 |
- |
42 |
|
1980 |
Dharchula,
Uttaranchal |
- |
- |
Heavy damage |
|
1980 |
Jammu, J&K |
- |
- |
12 |
|
1986 |
Dharamshala,
H.P. |
5.7 |
VIII |
Heavy
damage |
|
1988 |
Almora,
Uttaranchal |
- |
- |
1000 |
|
1988 |
Assam |
7.2 |
XI |
Few people
killed |
|
1988 |
Bihar-Nepal |
6.5 |
VIII |
Large number
of people killed |
|
1991 |
Uttarkashi,
Uttaranchal |
6.6 |
VIII |
768, heavy
damage to property |
|
1993 |
Latur,
Marathwada |
6.4 |
VIII |
10000, heavy
loss of property |
|
1997 |
Jabalpur,
M.P. |
6.0 |
VIII |
40, heavy
damage to property |
|
1999 |
Chamoli |
6.8
|
VIII |
100, heavy
loss of property |
|
2001 |
Kutch, Gujarat
|
6.9 |
X |
13,805, huge
devastation |
|
2005 |
Mujaffarabad,
Pakistan and Kashmir, India |
7.6 |
X |
73000 dead
including both countries. Heavy loss of property. |
(Table after: 'Bhukamp ek
Parichay', by R.K. Awasthi, GSI)
In the past
two centuries more than 60, 000 people have succumbed to earthquakes in
India. Nearly 56% of landmass of the country is affected by earthquakes.
It is natural that financially too earthquakes are a major loss.
Developed countries have take steps to minimize the losses in terms of
life and money both. For example, California in the USA is frequently
rocked by earthquakes. The seismologists of the Californian Geological
Survey (CGI) have developed techniques of estimating losses from
expected future earthquakes and have not only identified and categorized
the hazard prone areas but also calculated the direct economic losses
due to building damage. It may be noted that an earthquake leaves a
trail of indirect economic losses too in the form of capital stock loss,
income loss and loss of man hours.
United States Geological Survey (USGS) has prepared detailed 'shake
maps' of probable earthquakes. These maps entail details of ground
motion depending upon the magnitude, intensity and geological set up of
the concerned area. The maps also depict the impact of particular motion
on the soil and buildings. Using demographic data and the 'shake maps'
on specialized software the seismologists of CGI have worked out
estimated losses to buildings. The estimated annual economic loss due to
building damage for the state of California has been worked out to be $
2.2 billion. Los Angeles is the most vulnerable area of the State in
terms of highest expected annual loss of $740 million. The scientists
inform that greater the population density higher is the likely
per-capita loss.
The data
available with the United States Geological Survey is enormous and
consequently the calculations of probable losses are considered quite
realistic by the authorities. Considering the varieties of construction
materials across the length and breadth of the country and the social
and economic conditions collection of such data for our country on the
pattern of the developed countries has not yet been possible.
A.S. Arya a seismologist from the IIT Roorkee suggests development of
indigenous strategies for earthquake hazard evaluation and risk
reduction programs.
The evidences of stresses building up on the plate margin in the central
Himalayan region indicate that the area is most vulnerable for a major
earthquake. Arya carried out some probabilistic damage studies in Kangra
area of H.P. He states that if an earthquake of same intensity (M 8.0)
that struck Kangra (H.P.) in 1905 was to repeat in 1991 and if all the
18,15,858 houses (as per 1991 census) were without earthquake safety
provisions, the losses in terms of property would be to the tune of Rs
51.04 billion.
However, he states that if all the houses were made earthquake safe as
per the building design code of the BIS the extra cost involved would be
only Rs 6.35 billion resulting in a net saving of Rs25.09 billion. The
lives lost and houses destroyed would naturally be reduced drastically.
The financial losses after the Kutch earthquake of 2001 for the
buildings alone as estimated by the Confederation of Indian Industries (CII)
and Federation of Indian Chamber of Commerce and Industry (FICCI) amount
to a whopping Rs 120,000 to Rs 150,000 million. The infrastructure
losses amounted to Rs 30,000 million and Factories suffered a loss of Rs
15,000 million. The figures become colossal if loss of man hours
resulting in over all industrial production of Rs 25,000 million per day
is added. Much of these could have been avoided had the building codes
been really followed!
Making earthquake safe houses as per the laid standards involves an
extra expenditure of 25 to 35% says Prabhas Pande, Director GSI and an
eminent seismologist. In places like Delhi the house owners are prepared
to spend up to 75% more on additional balconies, projections and
decorating the house with huge chandeliers. Such houses become death
traps in the event of an earthquake.
If an earthquake of the type that occurred in Delhi in 1720 when 1000
people perished under the collapsed houses, repeats then at least 55
lakh people in Delhi are at grave risk say the seismologists. The house
owners and builders of earthquake prone area like Delhi must realize
that the economics of the earthquake is very clear, investment in
earthquake proofing now is insurance for the future and a big life saver
too.
In the matter of recovering from the losses suffered the state of
Gujarat in India is worth appreciating. Within three years of calamity
(2001 earthquake) Kutch was totally resurrected. The earthquake lessons
were taken seriously and now the 98% constructions even in rural areas
comply with the earthquake safety norms.
Earthquakes will continue to shake our land. Management of this kind of
disaster needs a deep thought and a fool proof plan. Pande says that
that there are five factors that aggravate the problem, viz. i)
suddenness of the event, without any warning, ii) unpredictability of
the mechanism, iii) involvement of a very large area, iv) lack of
preparedness due to long recurrence periods and v) ignorance about the
risk. Amongst these the last two can be very well addressed by the
government and the society through media and education system.
The vastness and variability of gemorphological set up of our country
demands that a uniform disaster management model can not be practical.
Therefore the models have to vary as per the topography and density of
population. For example one of the major problems in mountain terrain is
post-disaster rescue and relief work. Villages are sparse and far flung
and often impossible to reach in the eventuality of an earthquake.
Normal measures of earthquake disaster management are being slowly
picked up by various states in India. Providing counseling to the
victims has not yet been included in the disaster management plan. The
victims, specially the children and women need the help of psychologists
and counselors to reduce the trauma of the quake that lingers with them.
On one hand earthquakes cause distress and on the other provide
information about the depths of the earth. That is why Daly said:
"Man is learning to harness for his enquiring use the very wrath of the
trembling of our vibrant globe are used to 'X-Ray' the deep interior" �
R. A. Daly, 1928
We will discuss more about some more geo-hazards in the forth coming
issues.
October 8, 2006
Image "Five story building collapsed
like pack of card."
|
|