| Channels |
| In Focus |
|
Analysis Bolography Cartoons Environment Opinion |
| Columns |
|
Business My Word PlainSpeak Random Thoughts |
| Our Heritage |
|
Architecture Astrology Ayurveda Buddhism Cinema Culture Dances Festivals Hinduism History People Places Sikhism Spirituality Vastu Vithika |
| Society & Lifestyle |
|
Family Matters Health Parenting Perspective Recipes Society Teens Women |
| Creative Writings |
|
Book Reviews Ghalib's Corner Humor Individuality Jagoji Literary Shelf Love Letters Memoirs Musings Ramblings Stories Travelogues |
| Computing |
|
General Articles CC++ Flash Internet Security Java Linux Networking |
History
Koh-i-Nur
A Diamond's Incredible Journey
by Neria Harish Hebbar, MD
“The
Agate on the wearer strength bestows,
With ruddy health his fresh complexion glows;
Both eloquence and grace by it are given,
He gains favor both of earth and heaven.”
–
Marboeuf, Bishop of Rennes, (11th century),
describing virtues of the Agate.
The most
famous diamond of India, Koh-i-Nur, has a colorful history and journey
over more than five hundred years. It has been said that whoever
owned the Koh-i-Nur ruled the world. But there is also a darker
side to the story of Koh-i-Nur. Some who have owned this coveted
diamond also have suffered torture and blinding, but yet have refused to
part with it. The Koh-i-Nur is a veritable household name in many
parts of the world.
It is mentioned first in Babur-nama, an autobiography by the first
Mughal ruler, Babur (1526-1530). After the battle of Panipat,
where Ibrahim Lodhi was soundly defeated, Babur rode to Delhi and
Humayun, his son, swiftly rode to Agra, the Lodhi capital. Here he
found Ibrahim Lodhi’s mother taking shelter and also the family of Raja
Vikramaditya of Gwalior. Vikramaditya had fought next to Ibrahim
Lodhi in Panipat, where both of them had lost their lives. To
appease Humayun and to curry favor with him, Vikramaditya’s family
offered him bundles of jewels and diamonds. Among them was the
legendary diamond Koh-i-Nur. (However, Babur did not know the name of
the diamond as Koh-i-Nur. It was Nadir Shah, more than two hundred
years later, who called it by that name).
Babur in his biography called Koh-i-Nur as Ala-ud-din’s diamond.
Babur perhaps was referring to Ala-ud-din Khilji, who had ventured south
to Deccan repeatedly during his rule in Delhi (1296-1316). Even before
he usurped his uncle and father-in-law Feroz Shah I, Ala-ud-din had
been in Deccan where he had subdued Ramachandra, king of Devagiri.
Whether he came to possess Koh-i-Nur here, or from one of his eunuch
General Malik Kafur’s several expeditions to the south in order to
plunder and raid is unclear. Moreover, diamond mines were in
Deccan (Golconda – Hyderabad) and Ala-ud-din was the first of the Delhi
sultans to venture that far south. Another historical postulation
is that Khilji took the diamond from the raja of Malwa, whom he had
defeated. It is generally believed that Sultan Khilji acquired it
in the year 1304.
|
Koh-i-Nur was an enormous diamond. It weighed around 186 carats (eight misqals) and according to Babur, its value was enough to feed the whole world for ‘half a day.’ Koh-i-Nur had a reputation of either bestowing its owner the status of world conqueror and ruler, or utter misery, misfortune and death. Because Babur was the first to mention the diamond in his memoir, it came to be sometimes known as ‘Babur’s diamond.’ Babur says that his son Humayun offered it to him because of its beauty and clarity, but he promptly gave it back to Humayun. |
|
"Bikermajit, a Hindoo, who was Rajah of Gwalior, had governed that country for upwards of a hundred years. In the battle in which Ibrahim was defeated, Bikermajit was sent to hell. Bikermajit's family and the heads of his clan were at this moment in Agra. When Humaiun arrived, Bikermajit's people attempted to escape, but were taken by the parties which Humaiun had placed upon the watch, and put in custody. Humaiun did not permit them to be plundered. Of their own free will they presented to Humaiun a 'peshkesh' (tribute or present), consisting of a quantity of jewels and precious stones. Among these was one famous diamond, which had been acquired by Sultan Ala-ed-din. It is so valuable that a judge of diamonds valued it at half of the daily expense of the whole world. It is about eight mishkels. On my arrival, Humaiun presented it to me as a peshkesh, and I gave it back to him as a present." – Translation from Babur-nama (entered in the journal May 4, 1526)
A Priceless Possession
How this
diamond came into the possession of the rajas of Gwalior is a mystery
that is unsolved. (It is presumed that when the raja of Gwalior
and Ala-ud-din Khilji had a peace agreement, the diamond was restored to
the Gwalior family by Khilji). Humayun came to power in 1530 after
the death of Babur. After a reign of ten years, he had become
comfortable in his throne, when an upstart Sher Khan Sur with a well
organized army defeated him in a battlefield near Kanauj.
Humayun’s forty thousand men army was thoroughly defeated by fifteen
thousand soldiers of Sher Khan Sur. Humayun barely escaped with
his life and became a fugitive in the deserts of Sind and Rajastan.
But he had escaped with his monstrous diamond, which he put to good use
in Persia. Humayun’s own brothers refused to lend him a hand in
his attempts at regaining Delhi. During his wanderings in search of
shelter, Humayun was offered a price for his precious cargo by some men.
Humayun became quite irritated by the men and said, “Such precious gems
cannot be bought; either they fall to one by arbitrage of the flashing
sword, which is an expression of divine will, or else they come through
the grace of mighty monarchs."
Humayun eventually took refuge in Tehran in the court of Shah Tamasp,
the Safavid ruler of Iran. Fortunately for Humayun, the Shah had a
fondness for diamonds and Humayun used “Babur’s diamond” as barter in
exchange for shelter and military help. This eventually led to
Humayun’s march back to Delhi (with twelve thousand Persian troops) to
regain his empire in 1555 from the successors of Sher Khan Sur. However,
Humayun had to leave his precious cargo in Persia. Koh-i-Nur had thus
passed on to the Shah of Iran. Koh-i-Nur had thus passed on to the
Shah of Iran. Abul-Fazl in Akbarnama mentions this event in 1547,
when Humayun gave the Shah of Persia innumerable jewels as gifts,
including Babur’s diamond. However, Shah Tamasp was said to have
not been too impressed by the gem.
What happened to Koh-i-Nur next is not exactly known. It had
somehow slipped back from Persia again into Mughal possession.
There is historical record of Shah Tamasp of Persia gifting a great
diamond to the Sultan of Golconda. This was then presented on to
Aurangzeb during his stay as Governor in Deccan (before he claimed the
Mughal throne) by Mir Jumla, a Persian adventurer in the service of the
Sultan of Golconda. Mir Jumla had collaborated with Prince
Aurangzeb and attacked Hyderabad. Aurangzeb defeated the sultan who was
besieged in the fort at Golconda.
|
According to
traveler Jean-Baptiste Tavernier, Mir Jumla also met Shah Jahan
in Agra and showered him with gifts, one of which was the same
Babur’s diamond that his great-grandfather Humayun had gifted to
Shah of Persia in order to save the Mughal Empire. |
Jean-Baptiste Tavernier, who visited Aurangzeb’s court and wrote the book The Six Voyages of Jean-Baptiste Tavernier in 1679. |
The Curse of Koh-i-Nur
The Koh-i-Nur stayed in Delhi for another one hundred years until Nadir
Shah of Persia, after plundering Delhi, carried the diamond back to
Persia in 1739. He had heard of the priceless stone and come
particularly in search of it in Delhi. His initial attempts to
find the stone were not successful. A woman in the then Mughal
emperor Muhammad Shah’s harem betrayed the Emperor, and informed Nadir
Shah that the Emperor hid the diamond in his turban. So the shrewd
Nadir Shah had to resort to a clever trick. He ordered a grand feast to
coincide with the restoration of Mohammed Shah to his throne (which
itself was an insult to the Mughal Empire of erstwhile fame and glory).
During the course of the ceremony, Nadir Shah suddenly proposed an
exchange of turbans, a well-known oriental custom signifying the
creation of brotherly ties, sincerity and eternal friendship. Mohammed
Shah was taken aback but at the same time was hardly in a position to
resist such a request. With as much grace as he could summon, he
accepted. Eventually when Nadir Shah went to his private apartment for
the night, and unfolded the turban to find the diamond concealed within.
He then exclaimed "Koh-i-Nur", meaning "Mountain of Light". The most
famous diamond in history now had a name.
Later the diamond was in the possession of Shah Rukh, one of the
grandsons of Nadir Shah. Shah Rukh had suffered immeasurably and
was even blinded by his foes, but refused to part with the Koh-i-Nur.
After he was dethroned and blinded, he was allowed to live as the
Governor of a province in Persia, but tenaciously held on to the
precious diamond.
A wily warrior Aga Muhammad by name had a penchant for diamonds and was
determined to take it away from Shah Rukh. He crafted a quiet coup
on the city and held Shah Rukh’s feet to fire (literally), and demanded
that he part with the Koh-i-Nur. Shah Rukh refused and suffered
more inhuman torture which he endured. Finally he made alliance
with Ahmad Shah Abdali, an Afghani ruler, who helped in his dire plight
in 1751. (The infamous Ahmad Shah Abdali had followed in the
footsteps of Nadir Shah and attacked Delhi repeatedly in order to fill
his coffers in 1756 and againg in 1760). After Shah Rukh’s death,
Abdali took the diamond and it stayed in Afghanistan for the next three
generations. From Abdali it passed on to his son Timur Shah (who
moved the capital from Khandahar to Kabul). Timur was a weak ruler
but quite potent in other ways, as he left behind 23 sons to contend for
the throne. Upon the death of Timur Shah in 1793, Koh-i-Nur was
inherited by his eldest son Shah Zaman. A fraternal dispute
developed between Shah Zaman and his brother Shah Shuja and the former
lost his eyesight as well as the Koh-i-Nur in the ensuing power
struggle.
There is an interesting story of the diamond in Shah Zaman’s possession.
The Shah, who had been blinded by his brother Shah Mahmud, had hidden
the diamond in the wall of his prison cell. A guard accidentally
brushed his hand against the chipped plaster and discovered the diamond.
Thus another brother Shah Shuja, who now was ruling Afghanistan came to
possess the diamond. Shah Shuja wore it proudly on his breast and the
British envoy Elphinstone (of Bombay) saw the diamond and mentioned it
to his colleagues. (After this the British never lost sight of the
diamond, as will be seen later in the story).
In any case, Koh-i-Nur did not bestow good fortune on the family of
Persians and Afghans who had plundered Delhi. It only brought
misfortune and misery to the grandson of Nadir Shah, in his tenacious
clinging on to the rock, despite being blinded and tortured. It
did not fare well with the Afghan family of Abdali either. His
grandson Shah Zaman had been blinded by his own brother and
incarcerated, but still refused to part with the diamond. Shah
Shuja himself was later overthrown and forced to seek shelter in India,
under Raja Ranjit Singh.
Back to India - A Short Stay
Shah Shuja was evicted and sought shelter in Lahore and was held under
the protection of Raja Ranjit Singh, the lion of Punjab. Ruling
from Lahore, Ranjit Singh had carved himself an empire that included
entire Punjab as well as Kashmir. Ranjit Singh was obsessed with
acquiring the diamond. Through starvation and torture as well
craftiness he succeeded in getting his information from the Zenana
(harem where nothing remained secret for too long). He was able to
make a deal with Shah Shuja. He offered protection and support so
that Shah Shuja could regain his throne in Afghanistan but the diamond
shone brightly on Ranjit Singh’s bracelet. Once again the diamond
had been used as a bartering tool to buy protection.
After the death of Raja Ranjit Singh, his kingdom languished with
internal strife and inept administration. When crafty Dalhousie
came to India as the Governor-general in 1848, his sole aim was to annex
as much land as possible. After the mutiny in Punjab, the British
had used it as a pretext to dispose of its raja, and annex all of Punjab
and Kashmir. The Koh-i-Nur remained in Lahore Treasury guarded by
British officers. An annexation document was promptly produced by
Dalhousie and Punjab came under British control after the Treaty of
Lahore.
The terms of the Treaty of Lahore also included the surrender of a gem
called Koh-i-Nur to the Queen of England. Administration of Punjab
had fallen into the hands of John Lawrence, who misplaced the diamond,
only to be discovered by a valet. Sir John Lawrence had set aside
his coat with the diamond in a small box and forgotten about it.
When Dalhousie demanded that Lawrence send the diamond to him, he
suddenly remembered about the gem and asked his valet if he had seen the
box. The valet brought the box and Sir Lawrence asked him to open
it. The valet opened the box and found a “bit of glass’ in it and
was least impressed by it. Dalhousie, the Governor-general took
great interest in the diamond, and personally transported it from Lahore
to Bombay. He never let it out of his sight, day or night.
He is said to have sewn it into his belt, and then tied the end of the
belt to a chain around his neck. The diamond that Elphinstone had laid
eyes on more than fifty years ago, was now firmly in the possession of
the British.
The diamond was placed in an iron box and shipped to England on aboard
HMS Madea. The ship did not have a smooth sailing. In
Madagascar, the crew contracted Cholera and the locals demanded that the
ship leave port immediately or it would be set ablaze. Even the
ship’s captain had been kept in the dark about his precious cargo.
Then the ship was hit with a gale that it barely managed to survive.
Finally the ship reached Plymouth, England and the two officers who were
in charge of delivering the diamond to Her Majesty, quickly disembarked
and took the iron box over to the East India House and handed over to
the Chairman and Deputy Chairman of the Company.
Dalhousie
tried to calm fears among the British and attempted to dispel the myth
that Koh-i-Nur brought misfortune to its owners. In a letter dated
September 1, 1850 he wrote: "I received your letter of 16th July
yesterday. The several sad or foul events in England on which it touches
have been mentioned by me heretofore, and they are too sad to refer to
you. You add that you knew this mishaps lie at my door, as I have sent
Koh-i-Nr which always brings misfortune to its possessor. Whoever was
the exquisite person from whom you heard this...he was rather lame both
on his history and tradition...As for tradition, when Shah Shoojah
[Shuja], from whom it was taken, was afterwards asked by Runjeat's
[Ranjit Singh's] desire, 'What was the value of Koh-i-Nur?' he replied,
'Its value is Good Fortune, for whoever possesses it has been superior
to all his enemies.' I sent the Queen a narrative of this conversation
with Shah Shoojah, taken from the mouth of the messenger."
The Crown Jewel
An aerial view of the Crystal Palace, built for the 1851 exhibition. The building was 1848 feet long, 408 feet wide and 108 feet tall at its highest point. It burned down in 1939. |
The Koh-i-Nur was presented to Queen Victoria at Buckingham Palace by the Deputy Chairman of the East India Company. A stone faced Queen Victoria received the diamond nonchalantly on June 3, 1850. The public got its first chance to see the diamond in the Great Exhibition held in Hyde Park. It was the star attraction of the Exhibition. However, the Koh-i-Nur could not be well exhibited as the light was inadequate and the cut of the diamond was thought to be imperfect. |
Prince
Albert, the Queen’s cousin and husband took keen interest in the
diamond. It had been crudely cut by the Indian cutters centuries
ago and did not show the luster properly. This disappointed Prince
Albert immensely. Experts from Amsterdam were brought in for
consultation and finally a design was chosen to re-cut the Koh-i-Nur and
placed on the mill in July 1852. Before being re-cut the diamond
was valued at 140,000 pounds. 8000 pounds had been spent to re-cut
it. However in terms of its history and colorful legacy, the Koh-i-Nur
will ever remain priceless.
Mr.
Voorsanger, a Dutch national, cut the stone and reshaped it in thirty
eight days, working twelve hours a day. The diamond shone brighter
but lost another eighty carats and reduced to 106 carats, much to the
dissatisfaction of the Prince Albert.
|
There were other
criticisms about the design and the waste that the diamond
suffered in its new form. Koh-i-Nur was an oval, flat
stone and was not conducive to be re-cut with the design chosen
without enormous waste and loss of precious carats.
Moreover it had several faults that made re-cutting treacherous
in respect to its size and weight. Prince Albert had been
warned about this well in advance by many experts. |
A drawing of
the Koh-i-Nur's facet pattern. This cut is called a 'stellar
brilliant' because of the extra facets on the stone's pavilion.
The actual diamond's facet layout is somewhat less symmetrical
than this drawing.
|
Myth and Controversy
The Koh-i-Nur has wrought misery to many of its owners, especially the
ones who plundered Delhi and took it back to Persia and Afghanistan.
It has also been used as a tool to entice alliances and support.
The prediction that it would either bestow rulership of the world or
miserable death to its owners was not entirely a myth.
Diamonds have been relegated almost divine status in India from
centuries. They fare prominently in many mythological stories.
A stone such as Koh-i-Nur could easily be an object of worship.
Legend has it that the stone was first recovered from the beds of River
Godavari by Karna, the legendary warrior in Mahabharata. He had
worn this diamond as a talisman.
But the journey of Koh-i-Nur is more or less documented after Humayun
was ‘gifted’ it by the fugitive family of Vikramaditya of Gwalior in
Agra. Its final resting place seems to is in the Windsor Castle,
as a priceless crown jewel. It was acquired by the British
monarchy during the apogee of the British Empire. However, the sun
has set over the British Empire and there is no guarantee that the
Koh-i-Nur will never again embark on another journey.
The story of Koh-i-Nur is not devoid of controversies. How many of
the stories and anecdotes are true and how many are fiction? There
is no agreement that the diamond Humayun acquired from the raja of
Gwalior’s family that Babur mentioned in his memoir is the same diamond
as the one Nadir Shah called Koh-i-Nur. ‘Babur’s diamond,’ as it
was called before Nadir Shah laid his eyes on it, may be a different
diamond all together. If the diamond that Babur wrote about
belonged to Ala-ud-din Khilji, how did the rajas of Gwalior come to
possess it? Was it restored to the rajas by the Sultan Khilji
after a peace treaty? This is an unlikely occurrence because of
the well known reputation and disposition of the Sultan.
How and when did Aurangzeb get the diamond back from the Sultan of
Golconda? Aurangzeb had attacked Hyderabad with the help of Mir
Jumla in 1656. That was only two years before he incarcerated his
father and proclaimed himself as the Emperor. Was the diamond that
Mir Jumla gave Aurangzeb the famed Koh-i-Nur? Or did Mir Jumla
give it directly to Shah Jahan in an attempt to convince him to attack
Golconda? Did the wily Mir Jumla give two diamonds, one each to
father and son? Was the diamond that Aurangzeb had cut by a
Venetian lapidary, a different diamond than Koh-i-Nur? Another
diamond that was called ‘the Mogul’ has now disappeared and its
whereabouts unknown.
Were the Mogul, Babur’s diamond and the Koh-i-Nur one and the same?
Koh-i-Nur and Babur’s diamond have been described by various observers.
Their weights and cut seem to be the same.
Just over a century later we are in a better position to evaluate some
of the famous diamonds of history. We now have details of the treasures
amassed by the Czars, Shahs and other monarchs. We know for sure that
there are three diamonds in existence, which have a direct bearing upon
the questions raised concerning the identity of the Great Mogul,
Koh-i-Nur and Babur's diamond. They are the Orlov, weighing 189.62
metric carats, now in the Kremlin; the Darya-i-Nur with an estimated
weight of between 175 and 195 metric carats and presumed to still be
among the Iranian Crown Jewels; and the Koh-i-Nur, whose former weight
before it was re-cut, was 186 carats, equivalent to 190.3 metric carats.
Regarding identifying truly historic diamonds with gems that we know
exist today, the suggestion that Koh-i-Nur and the Great Mogul once
formed parts of the same stone is impossible: the Koh-i-Nur is a white
diamond where as the Orlov - if we assume it to be the Great Mogul
(which it most likely is) - possesses a slight bluish-green tint. So,
the Daryai-i-Nur has been identified for sure as the largest fragment of
the Great Table Diamond; a very strong case exists for identifying the
Orlov as being cut from the 280-carat Great Mogul; and a less-strong,
but nevertheless valid case can be made for identifying the Koh-i-Nur as
Babur's diamond.
These questions probably will never be answered fully to a researcher’s
satisfaction. There are not enough historical records available to
answer them. But in the interim, the glory and the myths of
Koh-i-Nur lives on and has been recognized as one of the world’s
greatest diamonds
Koh-i-Nur’s 700 Year Journey
June 5, 2005
References
India, A Brief History: John Keay
A New History of India: Stanley Wolpert
A Brief History of India: Alain Danielou
Internet sources