Supreme Justice or Supreme Politics? by Rajinder Puri SignUp
Boloji.com
Boloji
Home Kabir Poetry Blogs BoloKids Writers Contribute Search Contact Site Map Advertise RSS Login Register
Boloji
Channels

In Focus

Analysis
Cartoons
Education
Environment
Going Inner
Opinion
Photo Essays

Columns

A Bystander's Diary
Business
My Word
PlainSpeak
Random Thoughts

Our Heritage

Architecture
Astrology
Ayurveda
Buddhism
Cinema
Culture
Dances
Festivals
Hinduism
History
People
Places
Sikhism
Spirituality
Vastu
Vithika

Society & Lifestyle

Family Matters
Health
Parenting
Perspective
Recipes
Society
Teens
Women

Creative Writings

Book Reviews
Ghalib's Corner
Humor
Individuality
Literary Shelf
Love Letters
Memoirs
Musings
Quotes
Ramblings
Stories
Travelogues
Workshop

Computing

CC++
Computing Articles
Flash
Internet Security
Java
Linux
Networking
My Word Share This Page
Supreme Justice or Supreme Politics?
by Rajinder Puri Bookmark and Share
 
Should law be interpreted by the dictates of political expediency rather than by principles of logic? If not, how is one to explain the latest dose of justice dished out by the Supreme Court (SC)? The SC has ruled that members of banned organizations cannot be treated as criminals by the police till they indulge in or incite violence. This ruling came in relation to a case involving ULFA member Arup Bhayan who had been convicted by a Guwahati court under the lapsed TADA law. 
 
The acquittal is politically welcome. Right now peace talks with ULFA are progressing favourably. Leniency towards its members is desirable. But the appropriate manner of extending the olive branch would be for the government to offer a conditional amnesty proposal. It cannot be achieved by the SC passing a judgment that defies logic and in the future could tie up the government in knots.
 
How can one legally be the member of an organization that is itself illegal? As for “indulging in or inciting violence”, cannot very substantial help be rendered to a banned organization without resorting to either option? Suppose a computer wizard aids a banned terrorist organization with his expertise to facilitate transmission of information unrelated to violent activity but otherwise crucial, would that render the member of a banned organization non-criminal? Other examples can be summoned to expose the dangerous consequences that can flow from this latest SC ruling. The honourable judges would do well to focus less on the problems besetting society and more on interpreting the spirit of law as it is intended.   
5-Feb-2011
More by :  Rajinder Puri
 
Views: 1160
 
Top | My Word







A Bystander's Diary Analysis Architecture Astrology Ayurveda Book Reviews
Buddhism Business Cartoons CC++ Cinema Computing Articles
Culture Dances Education Environment Family Matters Festivals
Flash Ghalib's Corner Going Inner Health Hinduism History
Humor Individuality Internet Security Java Linux Literary Shelf
Love Letters Memoirs Musings My Word Networking Opinion
Parenting People Perspective Photo Essays Places PlainSpeak
Quotes Ramblings Random Thoughts Recipes Sikhism Society
Spirituality Stories Teens Travelogues Vastu Vithika
Women Workshop
RSS Feed RSS Feed Home | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Site Map
No part of this Internet site may be reproduced without prior written permission of the copyright holder.
Developed and Programmed by ekant solutions