Human Intelligence: Development & Application by Dr. Frank S. K. Barar SignUp
Boloji.com
Boloji
Home Kabir Poetry Blogs BoloKids Writers Contribute Search Contact Site Map Gift Shop Advertise RSS Login Register
Boloji
Channels

In Focus

Analysis
Cartoons
Education
Environment
Going Inner
Opinion
Photo Essays

Columns

A Bystander's Diary
Business
My Word
PlainSpeak
Random Thoughts

Our Heritage

Architecture
Astrology
Ayurveda
Buddhism
Cinema
Culture
Dances
Festivals
Hinduism
History
People
Places
Sikhism
Spirituality
Vastu
Vithika

Society & Lifestyle

Family Matters
Health
Parenting
Perspective
Recipes
Society
Teens
Women

Creative Writings

Book Reviews
Ghalib's Corner
Humor
Individuality
Literary Shelf
Love Letters
Memoirs
Musings
Quotes
Ramblings
Stories
Travelogues
Workshop

Computing

CC++
Computing Articles
Flash
Internet Security
Java
Linux
Networking
Health Share This Page
Human Intelligence: Development & Application
by Dr. Frank S. K. Barar Bookmark and Share
 

Over a decade and a half ago Lawrence H. Summers, President, Harvard University, published his remarks about the shortage of women in science and engineering. He suggested that the innate aptitude of women was a factor behind their low numbers (The Math Myth, Time, March 28, 2005). Dr. Summers observed that women can't add two plus two as competently as men. His contention that men can process data faster than women because of their faster Nerve Conduction Velocity (NCV) is perhaps at best a highly intellectualised and debatable conclusion. NCV is not the only parameter that determines "intelligence". 

War of the sexes for dominance over the other has been on since ages, and Larry Summers view is a good exercise in igniting the battle. In this connection Yu Xie, a sociology professor, University of Michigan rightly states that any simplistic theory in this matter is doomed to fail.

Many biological factors play a role, and the final result is the interaction of biology with social conditions. Generally speaking, the brain of a female is more interlinked, and may be better suited for 'diplomacy'. Whereas, men are slightly more likely to say things without realising how their actions will affect others. 

Studies have shown that the corpus callosum, the bundle of nerve fibres that connects the two hemispheres of the brain was considered to be the key to intellectual development. It develops at different rates in boys and girls. The prefrontal cortex is the area of sober second thought, and women use it more often than men in conjunction with the amygdala which processes all 'emotions'. 

Men and women handle emotions differently. Studies have shown that men's brains are 10% bigger than women's brain, even when adjusted for the fact that on an average men are 8% taller than women. But the size does not predict intellectual performance.

By definition, intelligence is the capacity to acquire and apply knowledge, and an intelligence test establishes a rating by measuring a subject's ability to form concepts, acquire information, and perform other intellectual tasks. But all these data are arbitrary, and 'normals' are subject to a 'biological variation'. Moreover, in all these parameters a common denominator is "aptitude", which is the inherent learning ability, dependent on factors like 'heredity' and 'environment'.
 
Dr. Eric Berne, a psychologist, has presented an explanation at the cellular level. 

Initially the human embryo forms a three-layered tube. The inner layer grows into the stomach, lungs and other viscera; the middle layer into bones, joints and blood vessels; and the outer layer into skin and the nervous system. Usually these three grow almost at the same pace, and the average human being is a fair mixture of brains, muscles and viscera. Due to biological variations in some embryos, one layer develops more that the other, and the activities are mostly concerned with the overdeveloped layer.

Thus some people are mainly "digestion minded", some "muscle minded', and some "brain minded". Correspondingly we have 'viscerotonic endomorphs', the 'somatotropic mesomorphs' and 'cerebrotropic ectomorphs'. In addition, moving among us are 'normal' people. Thus unequivocal conclusions about relationship of sex with "braininess" is impossible. Rather it depends on training, heredity, nurture, and environment. 
 

9-Aug-2011
More by :  Dr. Frank S. K. Barar
 
Views: 1293
Share This Page
Post a Comment
Bookmark and Share
Name*
Email ID*  (will not be published)
Comment
Verification Code*
R5X32
Please fill the above code for verification.

    

 
 
Top | Health



 

~*~
Solitude and other poems by Rajender Krishan 

    A Bystander's Diary     Analysis     Architecture     Astrology     Ayurveda     Book Reviews
    Buddhism     Business     Cartoons     CC++     Cinema     Computing Articles
    Culture     Dances     Education     Environment     Family Matters     Festivals
    Flash     Ghalib's Corner     Going Inner     Health     Hinduism     History
    Humor     Individuality     Internet Security     Java     Linux     Literary Shelf
    Love Letters     Memoirs     Musings     My Word     Networking     Opinion
    Parenting     People     Perspective     Photo Essays     Places     PlainSpeak
    Quotes     Ramblings     Random Thoughts     Recipes     Sikhism     Society
    Spirituality     Stories     Teens     Travelogues     Vastu     Vithika
    Women     Workshop
RSS Feed RSS Feed Home | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Site Map

garcinia cambogia

seo services

seo services

No part of this Internet site may be reproduced without prior written permission of the copyright holder.
Developed and Programmed by ekant solutions