Constitutional Lokpal is Half-measure! by Rajinder Puri SignUp
Boloji.com
Boloji
Home Kabir Poetry Blogs BoloKids Writers Contribute Search Contact Site Map Advertise RSS Login Register
Boloji
Channels

In Focus

Analysis
Cartoons
Education
Environment
Going Inner
Opinion
Photo Essays

Columns

A Bystander's Diary
Business
My Word
PlainSpeak
Random Thoughts

Our Heritage

Architecture
Astrology
Ayurveda
Buddhism
Cinema
Culture
Dances
Festivals
Hinduism
History
People
Places
Sikhism
Spirituality
Vastu
Vithika

Society & Lifestyle

Family Matters
Health
Parenting
Perspective
Recipes
Society
Teens
Women

Creative Writings

Book Reviews
Ghalib's Corner
Humor
Individuality
Literary Shelf
Love Letters
Memoirs
Musings
Quotes
Ramblings
Stories
Travelogues
Workshop

Computing

CC++
Computing Articles
Flash
Internet Security
Java
Linux
Networking
My Word Share This Page
Constitutional Lokpal is Half-measure!
by Rajinder Puri Bookmark and Share
 

The Union Law Minister Mr. Salman Khurshid has announced the government’s intention of giving the proposed Lokpal a constitutional status. He said the Lokpal would be “more powerful than the Election Commission”. He thanked Mr. Rahul Gandhi for having mooted the idea in parliament. This writer is also very grateful to Mr. Gandhi for having made the proposal. Had he not done so, who in this government would have bothered about what was suggested in these columns much earlier on 18 June, 2011? Readers might recall that I had dismissed the very proposal of establishing the Lokpal as being counter productive. But because the proposal had got identified with the fight against corruption so deeply imbedded in the public’s consciousness, I suggested instead a remedy to rescue the proposal without inflicting damage to existing institutions.

I wrote:

“The Lokpal Bill can be rescued without upsetting the existing constitutional structure as the government wants, and at the same time effectively addressing popular demands voiced by representatives of the civil society… The following steps need to be taken…In order to differentiate the role of the Lokpal from that of the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) the new institution should be entrusted with dealing only with political corruption that involves ministers, chief ministers and the prime minister. The CVC may continue to deal with the rest of the corruption cases. The judiciary should be dealt with by an independent Judicial Reforms Commission that may along with the Lokpal be made a constitutional body….All these constitutional bodies should be under the direct purview of the President. The CBI too should be made into a constitutional body directly accountable to the President. It has been suggested that the Lokpal should consist of eleven members. All the members of the proposed Lokpal would be appointed by the President without clearance by the cabinet... In the new dispensation the President may continue playing the role of adviser to the cabinet and to parliament without exercising final authority. But with regard to the functioning of all constitutional bodies the President would exercise direct authority over them. This should be explicitly stated for the public satisfaction. This arrangement would be in total conformity with the existing Constitution without disturbing the existing political structure.”

Subsequently both the CBI and the CVC strongly objected to the proposal to bifurcate or to tinker with the present structure of the organizations. The judiciary criticized the proposal to bring judges under the ambit of the Lokpal as unworkable. But these developments did not fully vindicate the proposal mooted in these columns. Nor does the proposal to give the proposed Lokpal constitutional status offer sufficient satisfaction. By itself a constitutional Lokpal would be a mere half measure. The most crucial aspect that would make the proposed Lokpal a constructive and workable proposition relates to the changed role of the President. Without that the entire exercise remains hollow. Fortunately events are moving in a direction that might compel the government to alter the conventional perception about the President’s role.

The Gujarat High Court might also just vindicate the views expressed in these columns. In the current crisis related to the appointment of the Gujarat Lok Ayukta the court gave a split verdict. One Judge upheld the right of the Governor to act without consultation or clearance by the Gujarat cabinet. The second judge opposed it. Now the matter will be decided by a larger bench. If the final verdict upholds the Governor’s right to act without reference to the cabinet the matter will not end there. In the light of the court’s ruling the role of the President of India would have to be necessarily reappraised. As was pointed out when the controversy regarding the appointment of the Gujarat Lok Ayukta first arose,  the Governor is not subservient to the state government’s cabinet. Nor is the Governor subservient to the Union cabinet. In the Dr Raghulal Tilak case (1979) the Supreme Court had ruled that in no manner was the Governor “subordinate or subservient” to the Union Government. The Governor therefore has to be subservient to the President of India who is the appointing authority. The Governor cannot act as a sovereign entity accountable to none. The President is finally accountable to parliament that has the right to impeach the President.

Describing the executive power of the State, Article 154 of the Constitution states:

“The executive power of the State shall be vested in the Governor and shall be exercised by him either directly or through officers subordinate to him in accordance with the Constitution.”

Describing the executive power of the Union, Article 53 of the Constitution states:

“The executive power of the Union shall be vested in the President and shall be exercised by him either directly or through officers subordinate to him in accordance with this Constitution.”

The only difference between the two is created by the 43rd Amendment of the Constitution which specifies that the President must act according to advice tendered by the cabinet. This amendment was introduced during the Emergency by a paranoid Prime Minister who had imposed dictatorial rule. Even if this Amendment is not scrapped, which it should be, the President’s powers related to all matters that do not emanate from cabinet decisions remain intact.

In the light of this if the Gujarat High Court decides that the Governor was justified to act without consulting the cabinet, how can the system disallow the President of India from doing the same? The government should mull over this question. And all political parties should start engaging their minds about a suitable Presidential candidate in the light of the emerging new realities after President Pratibha Patil’s term ends next year.
 

12-Oct-2011
More by :  Rajinder Puri
 
Views: 844
Article Comment Dear Sir,

Trying to foresee scenario in case of victory of better people over bad in ongoing political storm, meaning if Anna and Swami Ramdev make their ways, if axis of culprits in ruling alliance are put behind bars, and if opposition is cleansed before it comes in power - in all goodie goodie scenario, I feel that would not be sufficient enough for a long lasting win for India.

Because, the division in opinion and perceptions are increasing, because while on section looks in north, the other looks n south and rest in East and west. How can nation progress in such a case ?

Economic progress through industrialization is not solution alone to all the problems in India (as being painted by media these days). To excel, we need to reach our identity and take it forward with industrialization, economic growth and thereby change in lifestyle.

Currently, India does not speak in one voice even on small matters, leave alone serious matters such as Lokpal, black money and security threats to the nation. We need to think one and speak one in big matters and in matters dealing with fundamentals.

Then only, India can establish its identity and can achieve real progress.

For all this, we need one leader to whom everyone listens to and provides respect.

Earlier, this leader used to be the prime minister, when Lal Bahadur Shastri asked Indians to have fast once a weak, millions followed. Today, no one would listen to PM on such requests, and many will create mockery out of it, especially the media.

So, we need a leadership position, that is accepted as supreme and earns respect from everyone - individuals, business houses, social groups, elites, poor, all type of classes and organizations.

Such a leader can be the president, if changes suggested in this articles really take place.

If such a president is influential person, as should be always to suit the post, then he/she can command all, guide all and lead all in order to create modern Bharat from Bharat.

There is a chance, at least a dim light.

I have an interesting idea that can be clubbed with this idea of 'powerful president' - that will be unique in the world and will surely take India to the previous heights of excellence - sometime, I will write an article on Boloji !
Dinesh Kumar Bohre
10/12/2011
 
Top | My Word







A Bystander's Diary Analysis Architecture Astrology Ayurveda Book Reviews
Buddhism Business Cartoons CC++ Cinema Computing Articles
Culture Dances Education Environment Family Matters Festivals
Flash Ghalib's Corner Going Inner Health Hinduism History
Humor Individuality Internet Security Java Linux Literary Shelf
Love Letters Memoirs Musings My Word Networking Opinion
Parenting People Perspective Photo Essays Places PlainSpeak
Quotes Ramblings Random Thoughts Recipes Sikhism Society
Spirituality Stories Teens Travelogues Vastu Vithika
Women Workshop
RSS Feed RSS Feed Home | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Site Map
No part of this Internet site may be reproduced without prior written permission of the copyright holder.
Developed and Programmed by ekant solutions