Scientific Politicking? by Rajinder Puri SignUp
Boloji.com
Boloji
Home Kabir Poetry Blogs BoloKids Writers Contribute Search Contact Site Map Advertise RSS Login Register
Boloji
Channels

In Focus

Analysis
Cartoons
Education
Environment
Going Inner
Opinion
Photo Essays

Columns

A Bystander's Diary
Business
My Word
PlainSpeak
Random Thoughts

Our Heritage

Architecture
Astrology
Ayurveda
Buddhism
Cinema
Culture
Dances
Festivals
Hinduism
History
People
Places
Sikhism
Spirituality
Vastu
Vithika

Society & Lifestyle

Family Matters
Health
Parenting
Perspective
Recipes
Society
Teens
Women

Creative Writings

Book Reviews
Ghalib's Corner
Humor
Individuality
Literary Shelf
Love Letters
Memoirs
Musings
Quotes
Ramblings
Stories
Travelogues
Workshop

Computing

CC++
Computing Articles
Flash
Internet Security
Java
Linux
Networking
My Word Share This Page
Scientific Politicking?
by Rajinder Puri Bookmark and Share
 


Nuclear scientist Dr Santhanam has claimed that India's nuclear test at Pokhran-2 was a failure. A few scientists have supported him. Former National Security Adviser Brajesh Mishra has contradicted him. Present Naval Chief Admiral Suresh Mehta has rubbished the claim. What is the truth? Laymen are in no position to judge his claim. But even laymen have every right to raise pointed questions. 

Dr Santhanam's claim has profound implications for India's reputation regarding its security preparedness as well as its nuclear status. Scientists cannot be unaware of this. Yet Dr Santhanam went public to sensationalize his claim. Why? Was his disclosure motivated?

There are two obvious beneficiaries that will profit from his claim. At the domestic level this claim will diminish the achievement of the NDA government which conducted the test in 1998. That will further enhance the reputation of the UPA government already preening over the infighting within BJP. At the international level this claim will benefit China and Pakistan. India's reputation as a nuclear power takes a nosedive. The Indo-Us Nuclear deal opposed by both China and Pakistan appears farcical. Therefore Dr Santhanam must answer two simple questions:

  1. Why did he remain silent when the Pokhran-2 Test was conducted 11 years ago?

  2. What has provoked him to speak up now?

The motives of Dr Santhanam for the timing of his disclosure are highly suspect. These days, members of the elite cutting across politics, judiciary, bureaucracy, scientific community and the media have come to believe they are above accountability and can shoot their mouths off as they please. A large number of them aspire for plum posts. The entire elite are held in contempt by the silent majority of people. But when statements impinge on national security and India's reputation abroad, silence is not possible.

So, will Dr Santhanam kindly explain his earlier silence and current volubility? 

27-Aug-2009
More by :  Rajinder Puri
 
Views: 960
 
Top | My Word







A Bystander's Diary Analysis Architecture Astrology Ayurveda Book Reviews
Buddhism Business Cartoons CC++ Cinema Computing Articles
Culture Dances Education Environment Family Matters Festivals
Flash Ghalib's Corner Going Inner Health Hinduism History
Humor Individuality Internet Security Java Linux Literary Shelf
Love Letters Memoirs Musings My Word Networking Opinion
Parenting People Perspective Photo Essays Places PlainSpeak
Quotes Ramblings Random Thoughts Recipes Sikhism Society
Spirituality Stories Teens Travelogues Vastu Vithika
Women Workshop
RSS Feed RSS Feed Home | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Site Map
No part of this Internet site may be reproduced without prior written permission of the copyright holder.
Developed and Programmed by ekant solutions