Partition of India by Anjali Gupta SignUp
Boloji.com
Boloji
Home Kabir Poetry Blogs BoloKids Writers Contribute Search Contact Site Map Advertise RSS Login Register
Boloji
Channels

In Focus

Analysis
Cartoons
Education
Environment
Going Inner
Opinion
Photo Essays

Columns

A Bystander's Diary
Business
My Word
PlainSpeak
Random Thoughts

Our Heritage

Architecture
Astrology
Ayurveda
Buddhism
Cinema
Culture
Dances
Festivals
Hinduism
History
People
Places
Sikhism
Spirituality
Vastu
Vithika

Society & Lifestyle

Family Matters
Health
Parenting
Perspective
Recipes
Society
Teens
Women

Creative Writings

Book Reviews
Ghalib's Corner
Humor
Individuality
Literary Shelf
Love Letters
Memoirs
Musings
Quotes
Ramblings
Stories
Travelogues
Workshop

Computing

CC++
Computing Articles
Flash
Internet Security
Java
Linux
Networking
Opinion Share This Page
Partition of India
by Anjali Gupta Bookmark and Share
 

August 15, 1947 was a very significant day for Muslims, Hindus, Sikhs and many others. 

It marked the day of the British partition of India into a Muslim-controlled Pakistan and a Hindu-dominated India. India won its freedom from colonial rule, ending nearly 200 years of British rule. Many different events lead to the final decision of the partition. 

During the 18th and 19th centuries, the British gained full power over India. Bitterness towards the British developed as Hindus and Muslims were denied jobs and high positions in the government and army. 

The Indian National Congress (INC), lead by Jawaharlal Nehru, was created by the end of the 19th Century. Indians demanded equal opportunity and freedom from colonial rule. 

The British wanted to make the Muslims their allies in order to counter the perceived threat of the Hindu educated class. The British feared the potential threat from the Muslims, since the Muslims were the former rulers of the subcontinent and ruled India for over 300 years under the Mughal Empire. In order to win them over to their side, the British helped support the All-India Muslim Conference. They instilled the notion that the Muslims were a separate political entity and by the beginning of the 1900s they gave the Muslims separate electorates in local government all over British India. Thus the idea of the separateness of Muslims in India was built into the electoral process of India.

Muslim leaders led by Mohammed Ali Jinnah felt that the Hindus, by dominating the Indian National Congress, were beginning to dictate decision-making in British India. The Muslims felt they should have their own state in order to protect their Islamic heritage. So in 1940, the All-India Muslim League declared its desire for a separate state. Hindus began to feel uncomfortable about being a minority in a majority Muslim State. Relations between the two groups began to deteriorate. 

On August 16, 1946, in its demand for a separate Pakistan, the Muslim League called for "Direct Action" day. Direct Action day witnessed thousands of Muslims and Hindus fighting in mixed areas. Calcutta became the scene of the most brutal violence in what became known as the great 'Calcutta killings'. Within 72 hours, more than 5,000 people died, at least 20,000 were seriously injured, and a hundred thousand residents of Calcutta City alone were left homeless. As Jinnah remarked "If not a divided India, then a destroyed India". More violence followed as the rioting spread to the rural areas of Punjab and the Ganges valley.

British and Indian leaders such as Nehru and Valla Bhai Patel decided that the only solution to the conflict was a partition. Lord Mountbatten, the last Viceroy of India, was given full power by one of the British leaders to negotiate any agreement he could to help come to some sort of conclusion. Mountbatten saw that the only way for the British to withdraw was to transfer power to two governments, not one. With this in mind, he pressured and finally persuaded congress to accept the idea of a divided India. He made the announcement of the partition and declared the boundaries, which would divide India into two. His plan was to create two separate wings in the areas where the Muslims were the most numerous, in northwest India and in eastern Bengal which together would form Jinnah's Pakistan. This meant that both Bengal and Punjab would be divided between India and Pakistan.

Thus, August 14, 1947 saw the birth of the new Islamic Republic of Pakistan- a Muslim nation separate from the predominantly Hindu India. At midnight the next day (on Aug. 15, 1947) India won its freedom from colonial rule. Pakistan was made up of two regions: West Pakistan on the Indus River plain, and East Pakistan, which is now known as Bangladesh.

In a speech to the nation in the night of August 14th, Nehru, the first Prime Minister of independent India said "A moment comes which comes but rarely in history, when we step from the old to the new, when a age ends, and when the soul of a nation long suppressed, finds utterance."

For Indians, the partition was the logical outcome of Britain's policies of dividing and ruling. For Pakistanis it was their founding moment. It was the outcome of the struggle of Muslims to have their separate identity recognized by both the British and the Indian nationalist movement. For the British, the partition was a necessity because they could no longer afford the cost of maintaining colonial rule. It was unquestionably a very significant event for many.

The partition can also be seen from a different perspective; on a more personal level. "Cracking India", a novel written by Bapsi Sidhwa, is a fascinating account of the violent racial-religious clashes created by the partition of India and Pakistan as seen through the eyes of Lenny, an eight-year-old girl. The experiences, hopes and fears of Lenny provide an intense image of the period. Lenny is growing up rich in pre-partition Lahore (the Punjabi city that saw some of the bloodiest pogroms) in 1947. This story is unique in that it not only comes from the point of view of a child, but also from within an impartial community. Lenny, belonged to the minority sect of 'Parsees', who are new there and emigrated from Persia during the 9th century in order to escape religious persecution following the rise of Islam. The Parsees were not allied with any particular ethnic group during Partition and thus tried to remain neutral among the warring Sikhs, Muslims and Hindus. Being neither Hindu nor Muslim, the Parsees were able to keep out of the sectarian divide and stayed on the sidelines; they were not targeted by the mobs nor forced leave. 

The story begins with the British preparing to quit their empire in India and the process of splitting British India into Independent India and Pakistan is about to begin. Lenny's family is well off and maintains friendly relations with various religious groups. But later, these relationships begin to turn sour. Everyday jokes and innocent games between friends of different ethnic and religious backgrounds are replaced by bickering and harsh remarks over religion and family bloodlines. The serious killing begins. Lenny and her nanny, Ayah see Sikhs slaughtering Muslims, Hindus butchering Muslims and Muslims burning Hindus alive. Men betray one another. Rising tensions are inflamed with reports of murder, rape, and rioting mobs wrecking homes, shops and temples and mosques. "One day everybody is themselves," Lenny observes, "and the next day they are Hindu, Muslim, Sikh, Christian. People shrink, dwindling into symbols."

Ayah (a Hindu), is the kind of woman who is desired by every man. She has two main admirers in this story, one a Hindu (Hasan), and the other a Muslim (Ice Candy Man). Ice Candy Man turns into a madman when Ayah falls in love with Hasan. He becomes one of the many roaming the streets of Lahore with vengeance and murder on their minds. Enraged by jealousy, he leads a group of Muslim rioters to Lenny's house to demand the removal of all Hindu servants, including Ayah. The servants attempt to protect Ayah, claiming that she has left the house; but trusting the Ice Candy Man, Lenny admits that Ayah is still in the house. The young nanny is dragged off to her death. Lenny's innocent mistake will haunt her for the rest of her life. 

This story vividly portrays how the process of partition claimed many lives in the riots. It shows it in an up close and personal level. All in the name of religion and nationalism, people who had lived together in relative harmony for centuries committed mindless acts of violence against each other. It was a tragic experience because over a million Hindus, Sikhs and Muslims who were killed. Twelve million people were forced to move-Hindus to India, and Muslims to Pakistan. Both groups moved because they feared being ruled by leaders of the other faith. If a Hindu, Muslim or Sikh was caught on the wrong side of the dividing lines, they were driven out of their homes. The journey was long and torturous. Many people were forced to leave their possessions or trade them for water. Hunger, thirst and exhaustion killed others. An estimated 75,000 women were raped. 

The two countries lost many of their most dynamic leaders, such as Gandhi, Jinnah and Allama Iqbal, soon after the partition. Pakistan had to face the separation of Bangladesh in 1971. Even the imposition of an official boundary has not stopped conflict between them. A war between India and Pakistan continues to this day. Boundary issues, left unresolved by the British, have caused two wars and continuing conflict between the two countries. Over the past fifty years, India and Pakistan have been in a state of constant hostility, fighting three wars in 1947-48, 1963 and 1971. In the last decade, they have fought over the possession of Kashmir and the drawing of boundaries in the high Himalayas.

5-Oct-2000
More by :  Anjali Gupta
 
Views: 9309
Article Comment Guys just want to clarify that Hindus and Muslims never lived together in peace.
Right from Maharan Pratap vs Akbar rivalry the two religions were desperate for each others blood. This s is all rubbish that before the Britishers Indians used to live in harmony with each other. So the partition was neccessary because if the partition had not happened then India would have been a Weak Federation and there would be communal violence in the country.
(Of cource my name is not Kabir, but as Kabir doesn't tell my religion I have used this name.)
Kabir
06/10/2014
Article Comment Fate gives all of us three teachers, three friends, three enemies, and three great loves in our lives. But these twelve are always disguised, and we can never know which one is which until we’ve loved them, left them, or fought them.”
dheeraj jawla
01/31/2014
Article Comment The above is not true History. Mr Jinnah was memeber of Indian congress for long . Ms Swarojini Naidu called him as 'Ambassador of Hindu-Muslim Unity.Why he had to leave Congress ? Why he demanded seperate land for Indian Muslims ? Some of the Hindu Leaders, like, Savarkar, MS Golwalkar,wanted to drive out the Muslim Populations from India. Read the book, "We or our Nationhood Defined " written by MS Golwalkar. (This book is the main idological book of Today's RSS) Let us see,What the Hindu Leaders thought about Muslims in that pre-partition era. Let's see What Golwalkar wrote. " The Non-Hindu people of Hidustan must either adopt Hindu culture and Languages , must learn and respect and hold in reverence the Hindu religion,.........in a word they must cese to be foreigners , or may stay in the country, wholly subordinated to the Hindu nation, claiming nothing, deserving no privileges, far less any preferential treatment not even citizen's right". Muslim did'nt want to live as slave, and that's why Pakistan was created.
Ariful haque
01/12/2014
Article Comment This is Deepak. I am a Hindu. I have got something to say .. Before partition both Muslims and Hindus were living like children of the same mother. We were like a family. Ask your Grandparents if you don't know about it. However, due to the dirty politicians of the Indian National Congress and the crooked britishers the partition happened. Fine, so what was the necessity for all the violence. Why couldn't the Hindus who were living in pakistan and the muslims living in India were not given a chance to peacefully choose the nation in which they wanted to live in. I being a Hindu am neither supporting the hindus nor the muslims. I am being neutral. Anyway, fine we cannot change the past. Even now we people are considering each others as enemies ? Why can't we just forget about the past and concentrate on the growth of our respective nations ? I have watched few videos on youtube in which the kids who are living in pakistan are being provoked and are being turned against Hinduism, which is wrong .. People in India do not entertain such provoking and hatred things and the law takes strict actions against those who does. Where as in pakistan that is not the case. People from pakistan might deny what I have said but thats the fact. Instead of filling hatredness in the minds and hearts of your children why dont you people of pakistan educate them and make them good citizens of your country ? Anyway I didn't mean to offend any religion or country. Indians have forgotten about everything and have accepted muslims in their country but you people haven't. So what my point is that both muslims and hindus will have to forget about the past and live in peace. It will be good if we live like brothers, if that isnt possible then we can live like neighbors but peacefully. Lets stop all this nonsense and live our lives.
Deepak
05/27/2013
Article Comment Dear Muhammad Imtiaz Azam
20 Crores muslims are in India, same numbers in pakistan and same numbers are in bangladesh, total 60 crores.You could be in better position ,but now look at yourself where you people and where hindus are
Manish Maurya
04/16/2013
Article Comment Dear Raguib Uddin Ahmed
Did you listen about Two Nation Theory? I India remain unseparate then we the Muslims and all other nations will be the salves of Hindus because they have majority so it is right decision of Partition.
Muhammad Imtiaz Azam
04/13/2013
Article Comment I am from Dhaka Bangladesh. I have one simple question to you (Anjali Gupta) “Was it a wrong decision of having two separate countries for Hindu & Muslims in India in 1947? I believe if it was wrong we could be the biggest power to provide the World a Freedom of Choice for every citizen of Mother Earth, now which is dominated by USA.

Regards.

Raguib
Raguib Uddin Ahmed
11/07/2012
Share This Page
Post a Comment
Bookmark and Share
Name*
Email ID*  (will not be published)
Comment
Verification Code*
P4H55
Please fill the above code for verification.

    

 
 
Top | Opinion



Solitude and other poems by Rajender Krishan
 


    A Bystander's Diary     Analysis     Architecture     Astrology     Ayurveda     Book Reviews
    Buddhism     Business     Cartoons     CC++     Cinema     Computing Articles
    Culture     Dances     Education     Environment     Family Matters     Festivals
    Flash     Ghalib's Corner     Going Inner     Health     Hinduism     History
    Humor     Individuality     Internet Security     Java     Linux     Literary Shelf
    Love Letters     Memoirs     Musings     My Word     Networking     Opinion
    Parenting     People     Perspective     Photo Essays     Places     PlainSpeak
    Quotes     Ramblings     Random Thoughts     Recipes     Sikhism     Society
    Spirituality     Stories     Teens     Travelogues     Vastu     Vithika
    Women     Workshop
RSS Feed RSS Feed Home | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Site Map
No part of this Internet site may be reproduced without prior written permission of the copyright holder.
Developed and Programmed by ekant solutions