Home | Hindi | Kabir | Poetry | Workshop | BoloKids | Writers | Contribute | Search | Contact | Share This Page!                      Shop Online


  News
Channels
In Focus

Analysis  
Bolography  
Cartoons
Environment   
Opinion 

Columns
 Business
 
My Word 
 PlainSpeak 
 Random Thoughts 
Our Heritage

Architecture
Astrology
Ayurveda
Buddhism
Cinema 
Culture
Dances 
Festivals
Hinduism
History  
People  
Places 
Sikhism
Spirituality 
Vastu 
Vithika  

Society & Lifestyle

Family Matters 
Health
Parenting
Perspective 
Recipes
Society
Teens 
Women 

Creative Writings

Book Reviews
Ghalib's Corner
Humor
Individuality
Jagoji
Literary Shelf 
Love Letters  
Memoirs
Musings
Ramblings
Stories
Travelogues

Computing
  General Articles
 
CC++ 
  Flash 
  Internet Security 
 
Java 
 
Linux     
  Networking  
Advertisement
 Boloji Prepaid
 International
 Calling Cards

My Word 
Arjun Singh’s Politics
Reservation and The Politics of Reservation!
by Rajinder Puri

The die is cast. The government has declared war against anti-quota students. Mr. Arjun Singh masterminded the maneuver. His calculations must have been simple. State power can crush students and doctors. The overwhelming majority of Other Backward Classes (OBCs) would ensure an electoral sweep if polls were held. But before jumping to conclusions three things are worth noting: reservation, the politics of reservation, and the politics of Mr. Arjun Singh. Consider all three.

Reservation for OBCs is a flawed concept. Affirmative action for India’s deprived requires top priority. Among them the Dalits comprise a special category. Apart from poverty and discrimination they suffer untouchability. That is an inhuman practice that Black slaves in America never faced. That was why Mahatma Gandhi consistently and courageously fought against this evil. Because of untouchability the government rightly offered Dalits reservation on the basis of caste. After fifty years reservation should have ended. It has not. That betrays failure of governance. But that’s a different issue.

After Independence Dr. Lohia voiced political concern for OBCs. He wanted reservation for them too. During those days rural populations were mostly frozen. Villagers had little mobility. It was easy to identify caste with class. Class injustice took shelter behind its hypocritical opposition to casteism. That’s why Lohia favored OBC reservation. Today the distinction between OBC and Dalit reservation has blurred. Even experts on TV tend to talk of both in the same breath.

In retrospect Lohia was wrong. If covert casteism distorted class struggle the right step lay in removing distortions that had crept into class struggle. Lohia and Choudhary Charan Singh attempted to take short cuts which are now extracting a heavy price. Personal encounters with them confirmed that both leaders had private misgivings about OBC reservation. Lohia feared that reservation would replace revolutionary zeal by material greed. Charan Singh feared that caste divisions could disintegrate society. Nevertheless both persisted. Their followers should not hesitate to point out their error. All great men – Gandhi, Marx, Lenin, Mao, Roosevelt and Churchill among others – sometimes took wrong decisions. They were human. It is human to err.

Different Backward Class Commissions have given varying figures. The latest figures claim 52 percent of India’s population as being OBC. It was spread among 3743 different castes. Putting them all together in one OBC category is ridiculous. The powerful Yadavas have hogged most of the reservation benefits for OBCs. Even among Dalits the powerful Chamars have done likewise. Dividing OBCs into Most Backward Castes (MBC) and Extreme Backward Castes (EBC) does not help. There are too many castes to ensure equitable reservation, on a caste basis, for all the castes. What is the objection to well defined economic and social criteria to determine reservation? Only one objection comes to mind. Pro-reservationists might claim this would result in partial selection because of forward caste bias. There is a simple solution to this. Let all selection boards have reservation. Ninety percent of board members could be Dalit, OBC and Minority. That would allow affirmative action without accentuating caste in society.

To establish a genuine level playing field would require compulsory standardized government-run neighborhood schools throughout the nation. Even if the entire budget outlay for education were spent on implementing this the results would justify the investment. Other ideas to ensure effective affirmative action for circumventing caste could be considered, but it would be pointless. It is the politics of caste that motivates politicians to support caste-based reservation.

The parties don’t dare to question the Mandal formula, for fear of alienating voters. But the dynamic of electoral politics ensures that caste always influences selection of poll candidates. The social and ethnic composition of a constituency remains uppermost for democratic parties across the world. This is healthy and natural. It is the raising of caste representation to the level of ideology which creates divisiveness. This is what the Mandal Report achieved. This approach never brought electoral gain in north India. VP Singh’s post-Mandal electoral failures hold lessons. Parties propagating reservation as central ideology have not won. For example, would a Mandal-based OBC formation attract Mayawati’s Dalit voters? Only class consolidation can unify votes across castes to create a wave.

This makes the CPI (M)’s current support for reservation all the more pathetic. Mr. Karat wants caste-based reservation but excluding the creamy layer. And yes, the poor among forward castes should also get reservation! Then why have caste as a criterion? Ironically, the Marxists criticized Lohia for caste politics because it polluted class struggle. Today, they have forgotten class consolidation and fallen into the Mandal trap! The Mandal Report itself has categorized the same castes forward in one region but backward in another. Doesn’t that make nonsense of caste as a criterion?

Mr. Arjun Singh is as smart as they come. He knows all this. Then why did he rake up the reservation issue? Certainly not, as he claims, because Parliament approved the measure. Many Parliamentary Bills, including those signed by the President, are languishing unimplemented without Mr. Arjun Singh shedding a tear. Mr. Arjun Singh claims that the PM and cabinet had approved the policy. But did they approve his springing this issue in public the way he did?

Could Mr. Arjun Singh’s heart be bleeding for OBCs? Two incidents come to mind. In 1980 the Madhya Pradesh CM was to be elected. There were two candidates, Mr. Arjun Singh and a tribal leader, Mr. Shivbhanu Singh. Mr. Arjun Singh procured 85 votes. His opponent received 120 votes. Sanjay Gandhi was approached. He dispatched his emissary, Mr. Pranab Mukherji, to intercede. Consequently Mr. Arjun Singh became CM. So much about his sympathy for Backwards! Again, in 1993 a Madhya Pradesh CM was to be elected. The High Command appointed Mr. Arjun Singh as observer. The candidates were Raja Digvijay Singh and Mr. Subhash Yadav. The consensus favored Mr. Yadav. But Mr. Arjun Singh prevailed. A fellow Thakur, Raja Digvijay Singh, became CM.

After creating an intractable problem for the Prime Minister, Mr. Arjun Singh is receding into the shadows. He advised protesters: “On the issue of reservation the PM has made an appeal. There is need to have faith in him. After this appeal the agitation should end.”

This pious advice should be viewed in the context of secret confabulations among senior Congress leaders. One meeting took place at 2 am! The vibes are reminiscent of 1969 when Congress began to split. Mr. Arjun Singh’s move could lead to either rebirth or burial of Congress. Either would be better than the present. Earlier I had advocated burial of Congress. Now I wish Mr. Arjun Singh Godspeed.    

May 31, 2006

Top | My Word 

The Week of May 28, 2006     
Arjun Singh's Politics: Reservation and the Politics of Reservation! by Rajinder Puri
Congress Government's Two-Year Report Card : 3/10 by Dr. Subhash Kapila 
Schizoid America Tightens Indian Puppet's Loose Screw  by Gaurang Bhatt, MD  
Roots of Terrorism by V. Sundaram  
Can Non-Violence Still Solve the Problems of Today? by TA Ramesh
Andaman Faces Kargil-type of Invasion by MH Ahsan   
Quota Raj : A La Jallianwala by V. Sundaram   
Reservations and Rebellions by Dr. Prasenjit Maiti
Internet Bhagawan by J. Ajithkumar    
TV Invasion : An Addiction to Resist! by Naira Yaqoob 
Dilemma of India's Distant Education System by Dr. Prasenjit Maiti 
Wild Flowers of Tibet A Photo Essay by Kana Talukder
Giants of the Cold by VK Joshi 
Because There is a Cause by M. Qaiser and P. Mohan Chandran
Good Night, Sweet Dreams by Garima Gupta 
Ah, Newlyweds… Then Reality Sets In by Gary Direnfeld 
Have Two by Monisha Sen 
Healthy Kids, Fatigued Moms by Yvonne Barlow
Theatre Therapy for the Disabled by Neeta Lal 
New Peaceniks by Manjri Sewak 
Beyond the Caricature by Gautam Bhan 
A Very Good Woman to Know by Malvika Kaul 
An Intellectual A Short Story by NS Murty
My Dates with Dentists by PGR Nair  
Last Page of a Forbidden Diary by Suseela Pattamatta 
Mujhko NRI Bana De by Usha Kakkar 
Heritage Cuisine by Vikram Karve 
When I Stole from School by Arya Bhushan 
Virtualization by Ruchi Gupta 
 

Recommend This Page!

Analysis | Architecture | Astrology | Ayurveda | Book Reviews | Buddhism | Cartoons | Cinema | Computing | Culture | Dances
Environment | Fables | Family Matters | Festivals | Hinduism | Health | History | Home Remedies | Humor | Individuality | Jagoji
Literary Shelf | Memoirs | Musings | Opinion | Parenting | Perspective | Photo Essays | Places | Ramblings
Random Thoughts | Recipes | Sikhism | Society | Spirituality | Stories | Teens | Travelogues | Vastu | Vithika | Women

Home | Bolography | BoloKids | Columns | Hindi | Kabir | Poetry | Quotes | Workshop | Writers | Contribute | Search | Contact


Boloji.com includes IndiaNest.com and PoeticNest.com
Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
No part of this Internet site may be reproduced without prior written permission of the copyright holder.