Home | Hindi | Kabir | Poetry | Workshop | BoloKids | Writers | Contribute | Search | Contact | Share This Page!                          Shop Online


  News
In Focus

Analysis  
Bolography  
Cartoons
Environment   
Opinion 

Columns
 Business
 
My Word 
 PlainSpeak 
 Random Thoughts 
Our Heritage

Architecture
Astrology
Ayurveda
Buddhism
Cinema 
Culture
Dances 
Festivals
Hinduism
History  
People  
Places 
Sikhism
Spirituality 
Vastu 
Vithika  

Society & Lifestyle

Family Matters 
Health
Parenting
Perspective 
Recipes
Society
Teens 
Women 

Creative Writings

Book Reviews
Ghalib's Corner
Humor
Individuality
Jagoji
Literary Shelf 
Love Letters  
Memoirs
Musings
Ramblings
Stories
Travelogues

Computing
  General Articles
 
CC++ 
  Flash 
  Internet Security 
 
Java 
 
Linux     
  Networking  

My Word 
Who’s Hu in South Asia

Decoding India-Pakistan-China relations
by Rajinder Puri

There has been a flurry recently of diplomatic activity in South Asia. On Sunday Prime Minister Manmohan Singh left for Havana where he is expected to meet President Musharraf on the sidelines.

Last week President Musharraf signed an agreement with the Taliban located in Pakistan’s tribal belt bordering Afghanistan. According to the agreement the militants agreed to stop attacks on Pakistan and across the border in Afghanistan. In return Pakistan would release their prisoners, return their weapons, and allow them to live in peace. This set the mood for the President’s two day visit to Afghanistan where he conferred with President Hamid Karzai. Both leaders agreed to fight terrorism. President Musharraf reiterated that he would never allow foreign troops to enter the tribal belt or any other part of Pakistan.

Meanwhile, just after Pakistan’s peace deal with the Taliban, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh telephoned President Ahmadinejad of Iran and spoke with him for fifteen minutes. According to the PMO, the two leaders discussed the Iran-Pakistan-India gas pipeline and resolved to accelerate it. The projected oil pipeline would have to pass through Baluchistan. Would the two leaders not have referred also to the crisis in Baluchistan?

For meaningful inference from all this, certain trends that could have a bearing on coming events in the region deserve attention. Consider the Pakistan-Taliban deal. A section of the Taliban is located in Baluchistan. Its members are anti-US, pro-China and unsympathetic to the local Baluch insurgents. President Musharraf has shown no sign of accommodating Baluch demands. On the contrary he has reiterated his resolve to crush the rebellion. His deal with the Taliban will therefore strengthen his hand in Baluchistan. Through concessions, he has bought peace with Taliban to secure NWFP’s tribal belt.

This should please Beijing. China has a huge stake in Baluchistan where it develops Gwadar port and carries on mining operations. Presence in Gwadar will allow China to control the Straits of Hormuz to ensure smooth energy supplies from West Asia. An independent Baluchistan on the other hand would not only remove Chinese control of Gwadar, it would also jeopardize a future oil pipeline from Iran to Xingjian. President Musharraf’s deal with the Taliban could indicate therefore a decisive Pakistani shift from the US to China. The US too has vital interests in Baluchistan. Baluchistan provides the best route for gas pipelines from Central Asia.

President Musharraf’s promise to help America capture Osama has little value. The capture of Osama most likely does not depend on Pakistan’s cooperation. There have been persistent reports of Osama-sightings in areas close to Xingjian. Osama’s safest sanctuary is in China. It should be recalled that representatives of China’s Peoples’ Liberation Army (PLA) had met and struck a deal with Osama. Osama was to restrain an Uighur uprising in Xingjian. In return, PLA had agreed to build the communication network in Afghanistan which was then ruled by the pro-Osama Taliban. The Memorandum of Understanding was signed on the 9/11 day itself. Nothing has happened subsequently to suggest a weakening of ties between Osama, Taliban and PLA.

Debka File, an Israeli intelligence website, reported the entrenchment of Al Qaeda in Little Pamir, which is Osama’s safest sanctuary. It also reported a strong Al Qaeda presence in Xingjian’s border town of Kushi, where Al Qaeda cadres have been absorbed by Uighur Muslim extremist cells.

How would Iran view developments in Baluchistan? Iran’s own Baluch population would make Tehran averse to any demand for Baluch independence. But if China consolidates in Gwadar via a compliant President Musharraf, Iran’s own leverage through its port Bandar Abbas – which controls the Straits of Hormuz – would diminish. Would Iran countenance that? Paradoxically, American and Iranian interests might coincide in Baluchistan.

President Musharraf may have secured peace with home-grown Taliban. But what of the Taliban in Afghanistan? Is it not a matter of time before Pushtuns on both sides of the border make common cause to undo a division bequeathed by imperialism?

It should be noted that the Taliban commitment to Osama and to Al Qaeda is not binding. After 9/11, Kabul’s Taliban government was prepared to hand over Osama to a third country outside the US. America rejected the offer. The Pushtuns originally welcomed Al Qaeda not because it was a friend but because it was an enemy’s enemy. The Taliban would honor its ties to ensure safe passage to Osama. It would not jeopardize its own future. And what could be its future?

The key to this lies in the Durand Line Treaty which lapsed in 1993. According to it, whenever the Treaty lapsed the tribal belt areas of Pakistan’s North West Frontier Province were to return to Afghanistan. Because this was not done the Afghan government refused to renew the Treaty. Will not the Taliban get around to implementing that clause of the Treaty? And would not Pushtuns of Pakistan seeking reunification with their blood brothers support them? And would not even the Hamid Karzai government be compelled to support this demand if it gathered momentum?

As for Baluchistan – the borders of the province tended almost entirely to coincide with those of Kalat State – it remained independent for a full year after Partition. Only after that was it forcibly annexed through a treaty signed under coercion of Pakistan’s army. Why did this happen? Because in 1946, when Britain’s departure appeared imminent, the Khan of Kalat represented to the British government that Baluchistan was not part of British India. The lawyer who forcefully argued his case was Mohammed Ali Jinnah. As long as Jinnah lived Baluchistan remained independent. Only after his death did Pakistan annex it.

How will all these pulls and pressures resolve themselves? Much depends on the role of China. In November President Hu Jintao is expected in India. He remains an enigma. Either he is diabolically duplicitous or he has yet not consolidated power. He seems unable to control North Korea which survives on Chinese largesse and which derived its nuclear programme from China. So, is President Hu posturing before the world or can North Korean leader Kim Jong look for support from others in China?

Former president Jiang Zemin’s loyalists continue to occupy powerful positions in the government. Their policies run counter to the policies of President Hu. President Hu wants to contain the rapacious economics of the Shanghai group and to help China’s peasantry. But to keep Chinese economy afloat he must depend heavily on expanding exports. That’s why he needs India, a potentially huge export market. Keeping these trends in mind, the government should dispassionately assess how much, and at what price, does India really need China?    

September 13, 2006

Top | My Word 

The Week of September 10, 2006  
Who's Hu in South Asia: Decoding India-Pakistan-China Relations by Rajinder Puri 
South Asia: China's not so Benign Strategic Presence by Dr. Subhash Kapila
Further Leaks from God by Gaurang Bhatt, MD  
Terror Tests India's Secular Fabric by Col. Rahul K. Bhonsle 
Racism in North India by Aparna Pallavi
Nazi Holocaust Lessons for Gujarat by Manjri Sewak
The Sky is the Limit for India's Growth! by Niraj Chandra   
Is the Cultural Thread Keeping India Intact? by TA Ramesh 
Vande Mataram: The Divine Melody of Dilip Kumar Roy by V. Sundaram
Vande Mataram in Recorded Song: Fable and Legend by V. Sundaram
MC Chagla: A Titan among the Nationalists by V. Sundaram 
Uttaranchal Developing on Shaky Grounds by VK Joshi  
Sex Workers Speak Out by Elayne Clift 
Faith Conquers Fear by Anjana Mehta Bhalla  
The Witty Side by Melvin Durai 
All for the Roads by Prakash Pathre 
Desire and Deviance by Julia Dutta
The Importance of being Tulsi by Rajesh Talwar
From Kavalam to Kavalam by P. Ravindran Nayar 
Michael Madhusudan Dutta: Profile of an Epic Poet Compiled by Aparna Chatterjee 
Anju Badhwar Vora  - Profile of a Vithika Artist
Save your Money and Get on the Floor by Gary Direnfeld 
Guna: More Than a District of MP by Anil Gulati 
The Woman who Died Young by Dibyendu Ghoshal 
 

 

Recommend This Page!

Analysis | Architecture | Astrology | Ayurveda | Book Reviews | Buddhism | Cartoons | Cinema | Computing | Culture | Dances
Environment | Fables | Family Matters | Festivals | Hinduism | Health | History | Home Remedies | Humor | Individuality | Jagoji
Literary Shelf | Memoirs | Musings | Opinion | Parenting | Perspective | Photo Essays | Places | Ramblings
Random Thoughts | Recipes | Sikhism | Society | Spirituality | Stories | Teens | Travelogues | Vastu | Vithika | Women

Home | Bolography | BoloKids | Columns | Hindi | Kabir | Poetry | Quotes | Workshop | Writers | Contribute | Search | Contact


 
Boloji.com is owned and managed by Boloji Media Inc
Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
No part of this Internet site may be reproduced without prior written permission of the copyright holder.