�As everybody knows, according to the views propagated by the
Western scholars, humanity as a whole originated from one single
mother in Africa. Therefore, no race can claim racial superiority.
However, according to the research conducted by most Chinese
scholars, the Chinese are different from other races on earth. We
did not originate in Africa. Instead, we originated independently in
the land of China. The Peking Man at Zhoukoudian that we are all
familiar with represents a phase of our ancestors� evolution. �The
Project of Searching for the Origins of the Chinese Civilization�
currently undertaken in our country is aimed at a more comprehensive
and systematic research on the origin, process and development of
the ancient Chinese civilization. We used to say, �Chinese
civilization has had a history of five thousand years.� But now,
many experts engaged in research in varied fields including
archeology, ethnic cultures, and regional cultures have reached
consensus that the new discoveries such as the Hongshan Culture in
the Northeast, the Liangzhu Culture in Zhejiang province, the Jinsha
Ruins in Sichuan province, and the Yongzhou Shun Emperor Cultural
Site in Human province are all compelling evidence of the existence
of China�s early civilizations, and they prove that China�s
rice-growing agricultural history alone can be traced back as far as
8,000 to 10,000 years. This refutes the concept of �five thousand
years of Chinese civilization.� Therefore, we can assert that we are
the product of cultural roots of more than a million years,
civilization and progress of more than ten thousand years, an
ancient nation of five thousand years, and a single Chinese entity
of two thousand years. This is the Chinese nation that calls itself,
�descendents of Yan and Huang,� the Chinese nation that we are so
proud of. Hitler�s Germany had once bragged that the German race was
the most superior race on Earth, but the fact is, our nation is far
superior to the Germans.
During our long history, our people have disseminated throughout the
Americas and the regions along the Pacific Rim, and they became
Indians in the Americas and the East Asian ethnic groups in the
South Pacific. We all know that on account of our national
superiority, during the thriving and prosperous Tang Dynasty our
civilization was at the peak of the world. We were the center of the
world civilization, and no other civilization in the world was
comparable to ours. Later on, because of our complacency,
narrow-mindedness, and the self-enclosure of our own country, we
were surpassed by Western civilization, and the center of the world
shifted to the West.
In reviewing history, one may ask: Will the center of the world
civilization shift back to China ?
As
we all know, Nazi Germany also placed much emphasis on the education
of the people, especially the younger generation. The Nazi party and
government organized and established various propaganda and
educational institutions such as the �Guiding Bureau of National
Propaganda,� �Department of National Education and Propaganda,�
�Supervising Bureau of Worldview Study and Education,� and
�Information Office,� all aimed at instilling into the people�s
minds, from elementary schools to colleges, the idea that German
people are superior, and convincing people that the historical
mission of the Arian people is to become the �lords of earth� that
�rule over the world.� Back then the German people were much more
united than we are today.
Nonetheless, Germany was defeated in utter shame, along with its
ally, Japan. Why? We reached some conclusions at the study meetings
of the Politburo, in which we were searching for the laws that
governed the vicissitudes of the big powers, and trying to analyze
Germany and Japan �s rapid growth. When we decide to revitalize
China based on the German model, we must not repeat the mistakes
they made.
Specifically, the following are the fundamental causes for their
defeat: First, they had too many enemies all at once, as they did
not adhere to the principle of eliminating enemies one at a time;
second, they were too impetuous, lacking the patience and
perseverance required for great accomplishments; third, when the
time came for them to be ruthless, they turned out to be too soft,
therefore leaving troubles that resurfaced later on.
Let�s presume that back then Germany and Japan had been able to keep
the United States neutral and had fought a protracted war step by
step on the Soviet front. If they had adopted this approach, gained
some time to advance their research, eventually succeeded in
obtaining the technology of nuclear weapons and missiles, and
launched surprise attacks against the United States and the Soviet
Union using them, then the United States and the Soviet Union would
not have been able to defend themselves and would have had to
surrender. Little Japan, in particular, made an egregious mistake in
launching the sneak strike at Pearl Harbor . This attack did not hit
the vital parts of the United States . Instead it dragged the United
States into the war, into the ranks of the gravediggers that
eventually buried the German and Japanese fascists.
Of course, if they had not made these three mistakes and won the
war, history would have been written in a different fashion. If that
had been the case, China would not be in our hands. Japan might have
relocated their capital to China and ruled over China . Afterwards,
China and the whole of Asia under Japan �s command would have
brought into full play the oriental wisdom, conquered the West ruled
by Germany and unified the whole world. This is irrelevant, of
course. No more digressions.
So, the fundamental reason for the defeats of Germany and Japan is
that history did not arrange them to be the �lords of the earth,�
for they are, after all, not the most superior race.
Ostensibly, in comparison, today�s China is alarmingly similar to
Germany back then. Both of them regard themselves as the most
superior races; both of them have a history of being exploited by
foreign powers and are therefore vindictive; both of them have the
tradition of worshipping their own authorities; both of them feel
that they have seriously insufficient living space; both of them
raise high the two banners of nationalism and socialism and label
themselves as �national socialism�; both of them worship �one state,
one party, one leader, and one doctrine.�
And yet, if we really are to make a comparison between Germany and
China , then, as Comrade Jiang Zemin put it, Germany belongs to
�pediatrics�―too trivial to be compared. How large is Germany �s
population? How big is its territory? And how long is its history?
We eliminated eight million Nationalist troops in only three years.
How many enemies did Germany kill? They were in power for a
transient period of little more than a dozen years before they
perished, while we are still energetic after being around for more
than eighty years. Our theory of the shifting center of civilization
is of course more profound than the Hitler�s theory of �the lords of
the earth.� Our civilization is profound and broad, which has
determined that we are so much wiser than they were.
Our Chinese people are wiser than the Germans because,
fundamentally, our race is superior to theirs. As a result, we have
a longer history, more people, and larger land area. On this basis,
our ancestors left us with the two most essential heritages, which
are atheism and great unity. It was Confucius, the founder of our
Chinese culture, who gave us these heritages.
These two heritages determined that we have a stronger ability to
survive than the West. That is why the Chinese race has been able to
prosper for so long. We are destined �not to be buried by either
heaven or earth� no matter how severe the natural, man-made, and
national disasters. This is our advantage.
Take response to war as an example. The reason that the United
States remains today is that it has never seen war on its mainland.
Once its enemies aim at the mainland, they enemies would have
already reached Washington before its congress finishes debating and
authorizes the president to declare war. But for us, we don�t waste
time on these trivial things. Comrade Deng Xiaoping once said, �The
Party�s leadership is prompt in making decisions. Once a decision is
made, it is immediately implemented. There�s no wasting time on
trivial things like in capitalist countries. This is our advantage.�
Our Party�s democratic centralism is built on the tradition of great
unity. Although fascist Germany also stressed high-level centralism,
they only focused on the power of the country�s executive, but
ignored the collective leadership of the central group. That�s why
Hitler was betrayed by many later in his life, which fundamentally
depleted the Nazis of their war capacity.
What makes us different from Germany is that we are complete
atheists, while Germany was primarily a Catholic and Protestant
country. Hitler was only half atheist. Although Hitler also believed
that ordinary citizens had low intelligence, and that leaders should
therefore make decisions, and although German people worshipped
Hitler back then, Germany did not have the tradition of worshipping
sages on a broad basis. Our Chinese society has always worshipped
sages, and that is because we don�t worship any god. Once you
worship a god, you can�t worship a person at the same time, unless
you recognize the person as the god�s representative like they do in
Middle Eastern countries. On the other hand, once you recognize a
person as a sage, of course you will want him to be your leader,
instead of monitoring and choosing him. This is the foundation of
our democratic centralism.
The bottom line is, only China, not Germany, is a reliable force in
resisting the Western parliament-based democratic system. Hitler�s
dictatorship in Germany was perhaps but a momentary mistake in
history.
Maybe you have now come to understand why we recently decided to
further promulgate atheism. If we let theology from the West into
China and empty us from the inside, if we let all Chinese people
listen to God and follow God, who will obediently listen to us and
follow us? If the common people don�t believe Comrade Hu Jintao is a
qualified leader, question his authority, and want to monitor him,
if the religious followers in our society question why we are
leading God in churches, can our Party continue to rule China?
Germany�s dream to be the �lord of the earth� failed, because
ultimately, history did not bestow this great mission upon them. But
the three lessons Germany learned from experience are what we ought
to remember as we complete our historic mission and revitalize our
race. The three lessons are: Firmly grasp the country�s living
space, firmly grasp the Party�s control over the nation, and firmly
grasp the general direction toward becoming the �lord of the earth.�
What is the third issue we should clinch firmly in order to
accomplish our historical mission of national renaissance? It is to
hold firmly onto the big �issue of America .�
Comrade Mao Zedong taught us that we must have a resolute and
correct political orientation. What is our key, correct orientation?
It is to solve the issue of America.
This appears to be shocking, but the logic is actually very simple.
Comrade He Xin put forward a very fundamental judgment that is very
reasonable. He asserted in his report to the Party Central
Committee: The renaissance of China is in fundamental conflict with
the western strategic interest, and therefore will inevitably be
obstructed by the western countries doing everything they can. So,
only by breaking the blockade formed by the western countries headed
by the United States can China grow and move towards the world!
Would the United States allow us to go out to gain new living space?
First, if the United States is firm in blocking us, it is hard for
us to do anything significant to Taiwan and some other countries!
Second, even if we could snatch some land from Taiwan, Vietnam,
India, or even Japan, how much more living space can we get? Very
trivial! Only countries like the United States, Canada and Australia
have the vast land to serve our need for mass colonization.
Therefore, solving the �issue of America � is the key to solving all
other issues. First, this makes it possible for us to have many
people migrate there and even establish another China under the same
leadership of the CCP. America was originally discovered by the
ancestors of the yellow race, but Columbus gave credit to the white
race. We the descendents of the Chinese nation are entitled to the
possession of the land! It is said that the residents of the yellow
race have a very low social status in United States. We need to
liberate them. Second, after solving the �issue of America ,� the
western countries in Europe would bow to us, not to mention to
Taiwan, Japan and other small countries. Therefore, solving the
�issue of America � is the mission assigned to CCP members by
history.
I
sometimes think how cruel it is for China and the United States to
be enemies that are bound to meet on a narrow road! Do you remember
a movie about Liberation Army troops led by Liu Bocheng and Deng
Xiaoping? The title is something like �Decisive Battle on the
Central Plains.� There is a famous remark in the movie that is
full of power and grandeur: �The enemies are bound to meet on a
narrow road, only the brave will win!� It is this kind of fighting
to win or die spirit that enabled us to seize power in Mainland
China . It is historical destiny that China and United States will
come into unavoidable confrontation on a narrow path and fight each
other! The United States, unlike Russia and Japan, has never
occupied and hurt China, and also assisted China in its battle
against the Japanese. But, it will certainly be an obstruction, and
the biggest obstruction! In the long run, the relationship of China
and the United States is one of a life-and-death struggle.
One time, some Americans came to visit and tried to convince us that
the relationship between China and United States is one of
interdependence. Comrade Xiaoping replied in a polite manner: �Go
tell your government, China and the United States do not have such a
relationship that is interdependent and mutually reliant.� Actually,
Comrade Xiaoping was being too polite, he could have been more
frank, �The relationship between China and United States is one of a
life-and-death struggle.� Of course, right now it is not the time to
openly break up with them yet. Our reform and opening to the outside
world still rely on their capital and technology, we still need
America. Therefore, we must do everything we can to promote our
relationship with America, learn from America in all aspects and use
America as an example to reconstruct our country.
How have we managed our foreign affairs in these years? Even if we
had to put on a smiling face in order to please them, even if we had
to give them the right cheek after they had hit our left cheek, we
still must endure in order to further our relationship with the
United States . Do you remember the character of Wuxun in the movie
the �Story of Wuxun�? In order to accomplish his mission, he
endured so much pain and suffered so much beating and kicking! The
United States is the most successful country in the world today.
Only after we have learned all of its useful experiences can we
replace it in the future. Even though we are presently imitating the
American tone � China and United States rely on each other and share
honor and disgrace,� we must not forget that the history of our
civilization repeatedly has taught us that one mountain does not
allow two tigers to live together.
We
also must never forget what Comrade Xiaoping emphasized �refrain
from revealing the ambitions and put others off the track.� The
hidden message is: we must put up with America ; we must conceal our
ultimate goals, hide our capabilities and await the opportunity. In
this way, our mind is clear. Why have we not updated our national
anthem with something peaceful? Why did we not change the anthem�s
theme of war? Instead, when revising the Constitution this time, for
the first time we clearly specified �March of the Volunteers� is our
national anthem. Thus we will understand why we constantly talk
loudly about the � Taiwan issue� but not the �American issue.� We
all know the principle of �doing one thing under the cover of
another.� If ordinary people can only see the small island of Taiwan
in their eyes, then you as the elite of our country should be able
to see the whole picture of our cause. Over these years, according
to Comrade Xiaoping�s arrangement, a large piece of our territory in
the North has been given up to Russia ; do you really think our
Party Central Committee is a fool?
To
resolve the issue of America we must be able to transcend
conventions and restrictions. In history, when a country defeated
another country or occupied another country, it could not kill all
the people in the conquered land, because back then you could not
kill people effectively with sabers or long spears, or even with
rifles or machine guns. Therefore, it was impossible to gain a
stretch of land without keeping the people on that land. However, if
we conquered America in this fashion, we would not be able to make
many people migrate there.
Only by using special means to �clean up� America will we be able to
lead the Chinese people there. This is the only choice left for us.
This is not a matter of whether we are willing to do it or not. What
kind of special means is there available for us to �clean up�
America ? Conventional weapons such as fighters, canons, missiles
and battleships won�t do; neither will highly destructive weapons
such as nuclear weapons. We are not as foolish as to want to perish
together with America by using nuclear weapons, despite the fact
that we have been exclaiming that we will have the Taiwan issue
resolved at whatever cost. Only by using non-destructive weapons
that can kill many people will we be able to reserve America for
ourselves. There has been rapid development of modern biological
technology, and new bio weapons have been invented one after
another. Of course we have not been idle; in the past years we have
seized the opportunity to master weapons of this kind. We are
capable of achieving our purpose of �cleaning up� America all of a
sudden. When Comrade Xiaoping was still with us, the Party Central
Committee had the perspicacity to make the right decision not to
develop aircraft carrier groups and focus instead on developing
lethal weapons that can eliminate mass populations of the enemy
country.
From a humanitarian perspective, we should issue a warning to the
American people and persuade them to leave America and leave the
land they have lived in to the Chinese people. Or at least they
should leave half of the United States to be China �s colony,
because America was first discovered by the Chinese. But would this
work? If this strategy does not work, then there is only one choice
left to us. That is, use decisive means to �clean up� America , and
reserve America for our use in a moment. Our historical experience
has proven that as long as we make it happen, nobody in the world
can do anything about us. Furthermore, if the United States as the
leader is gone, then other enemies have to surrender to us.
Biological weapons are unprecedented in their ruthlessness, but if
the Americans do not die then the Chinese have to die. If the
Chinese people are strapped to the present land, a total societal
collapse is bound to take place. According to the computation of the
author of Yellow Peril, more than half of the Chinese will die, and
that figure would be more than 800 million people! Just after the
liberation, our yellow land supported nearly 500 million people,
while today the official figure of the population is more than 1.3
billion. This yellow land has reached the limit of its capacity. One
day, who knows how soon it will come, the great collapse will occur
any time and more than half of the population will have to go.
We
must prepare ourselves for two scenarios. If our biological weapons
succeed in the surprise attack [on the United States], the Chinese
people will be able to keep their losses at a minimum in the fight
against the United States. If, however, the attack fails and
triggers a nuclear retaliation from the United States, China would
perhaps suffer a catastrophe in which more than half of its
population would perish. That is why we need to be ready with air
defense systems for our big and medium-sized cities. Whatever the
case may be, we can only move forward fearlessly for the sake of our
Party and state and our nation�s future, regardless of the hardships
we have to face and the sacrifices we have to make. The population,
even if more than half dies, can be reproduced. But if the Party
falls, everything is gone, and forever gone!
In
Chinese history, in the replacement of dynasties, the ruthless have
always won and the benevolent have always failed. The most typical
example involved Xiang Yu the King of Chu, who, after defeating Liu
Bang, failed to continue to chase after him and eliminate his
forces, and this leniency resulted in Xiang Yu�s death and Liu�s
victory (during the war between Chu and Han, just after the Qin
Dynasty (221-206BC) was overthrown). Therefore, we must emphasize
the importance of adopting resolute measures. In the future, the two
rivals, China and the United States , will eventually meet each
other in a narrow road, and our leniency to the Americans will mean
cruelty toward the Chinese people. Here some people may want to ask
me: what about the several millions of our compatriots in the United
States ? They may ask: aren�t we against Chinese killing other
Chinese?
These comrades are too pedantic; they are not pragmatic enough. If
we had insisted on the principle that the Chinese should not kill
other Chinese, would we have liberated China? As for the several
million Chinese living in the United States, this is of course a big
issue. Therefore in recent years, we have been conducting research
on genetic weapons, i.e. those weapons that do not kill yellow
people. But producing a result with this kind of research is
extremely difficult. Of the research done on genetic weapons
throughout the world, the Israeli�s is the most advanced. Their
genetic weapons are designed to target Arabs and protect the
Israelis. But even they have not reached the stage of actual
deployment. We have cooperated with Israel on some research. Perhaps
we can introduce some of the technologies used to protect Israelis
and remold these technologies to protect the yellow people. But
their technologies are not mature yet, and it is difficult for us to
surpass them in a few years. If it has to be five or ten years
before some breakthroughs can be achieved in genetic weapons, we
cannot afford to wait any longer.
Old comrades like us cannot afford to wait that long, for we don�t
have that much time to live. Old soldiers of my age may be able to
wait for five or ten more years, but those from the period of the
Anti-Japanese War or the few old Red Army soldiers cannot wait any
longer. Therefore we have to give up our expectations about genetic
weapons. Of course, from another perspective, the majority of those
Chinese living in the United States have become our burden, because
they have been corrupted by the bourgeois liberal values for a long
time and it would be difficult for them to accept our Party�s
leadership. If they survived the war, we would have to launch
campaigns in the future to deal with them, to reform them. Do you
still remember that when we had just defeated the Koumintang (KMT)
and liberated Mainland China , so many people from the bourgeois
class and intellectuals welcomed us so very warmly, but later we had
to launch campaigns such as the �suppression of the reactionaries�
and �Anti-Rightist Movement� to clean them up and reform them? Some
of them were in hiding for a long time and were not exposed until
the Cultural Revolution. History has proved that any social turmoil
is likely to involve many deaths. Maybe we can put it this way:
death is the engine that moves history forward. During the period of
Three Kingdoms [9], how many people died? When Genghis Khan
conquered Eurasia , how many people died? When Manchu invaded the
interior of China, how many people died? Not many people died during
the 1911 Revolution, but when we overthrew the Three Great Mountains
[10], and during the political campaigns such as �Suppression of
reactionaries,� �Three-Anti Campaign,� and �Five-Anti Campaign� at
least 20 million people died. We were apprehensive that some young
people today would be trembling with fear when they hear about wars
or people dying. During wartime, we were used to seeing dead people.
Blood and flesh were flying everywhere, corpses were lying in heaps
on the fields, and blood ran like rivers. We saw it all. On the
battlefields, everybody�s eyes turned red with killing because it
was a life-and-death struggle and only the brave would survive.
It
is indeed brutal to kill one or two hundred million Americans. But
that is the only path that will secure a Chinese century, a century
in which the CCP leads the world. We, as revolutionary
humanitarians, do not want deaths. But if history confronts us with
a choice between deaths of Chinese and those of Americans, we�d have
to pick the latter, as, for us, it is more important to safeguard
the lives of the Chinese people and the life of our Party. That is
because, after all, we are Chinese and members of the CCP. Since the
day we joined the CCP, the Party�s life has always been above all
else! History will prove that we made the right choice.
Now, when I am about to finish my speech, you probably understand
why we conducted this online survey. Simply put, through conducting
this online survey we wanted to know whether the people would rise
against us if one day we secretly adopt resolute means to �clean up�
America. Would more people support us or oppose us? This is our
basic judgment: if our people approve of shooting at prisoners of
war, women and children, then they would approve our �cleaning up�
America. For over twenty years, China has been enjoying peace, and a
whole generation has not been tested by war. In particular, since
the end of World War II, there have been many changes in the formats
of war, the concept of war and the ethics of war. Especially since
the collapse of the former Soviet Union and Eastern European
Communist states, the ideology of the West has come to dominate the
world as a whole, and the Western theory of human nature and Western
view of human rights have increasingly disseminated among the young
people in China. Therefore, we were not very sure about the people�s
attitude. If our people are fundamentally opposed to �cleaning up�
America , we will, of course, have to adopt corresponding measures.
Why didn�t we conduct the survey through administrative means
instead of through the web? We did what we did for a good reason.
First of all, we did it to reduce artificial inference and to make
sure that we got the true thoughts of the people. In addition, it is
more confidential and won�t reveal the true purpose of our survey.
But what is most important is the fact that most of the people who
are able to respond to the questions online are from social groups
that are relatively well-educated and intelligent. They are the
hard-core and leading groups that play a decisive role among our
people. If they support us, then the people as a whole will follow
us; if they oppose us, they will play the dangerous role of inciting
people and creating social disturbance.
What turned out to be very comforting is they did not turn in a
blank test paper. In fact, they turned in a test paper with a score
of over 80. This is the excellent fruition of our Party�s work in
propaganda and education over the past few decades.
Of
course, a few people under the Western influence have objected to
shooting at prisoners of war and women and children. Some of them
said, �It is shocking and scary to witness so many people approving
of shooting at women and children. Is everybody crazy?� Some others
said, �The Chinese love to label themselves as a peace-loving
people, but actually they are the most ruthless people. The comments
are resonant of killing and murdering, sending chills to my heart.�
Although there are not too many people holding this kind of
viewpoint and they will not affect the overall situation in any
significant way, but we still need to strengthen the propaganda to
respond to this kind of argument.�
