The focus of the Naxal
strategy in India is now economic. They blasted high-tension power
lines in Bastar on 31 May and 2 June, leading six districts to go
without electricity for the next 11 days affecting mining operations
and movement of ore from the Bailadilla mines. This is in line with
the many attempts at disrupting electricity supply to various major
projects including that of the National Mineral Development
Corporation in Chattisgarh. The two day economic blockade on 26 and
27 June was also designed to contain the spread of prosperity in the
region. This was followed by a ban on farming imposed in Bastar
district. Policies such as Special Economic Zones which are
seemingly taking away land from farmers are also being exploited by
the Naxalite to advantage.
There were indications of
Maoist likely to focus on economic targets given the upsurge in
investment in the mineral rich states of Chattisgarh and Jharkhand. It
is reported by government sources that Chattisgarh had succeeded in
garnering Rs 1, 07,899 Crore of new investment. (Media Release by
Chattisgarh Government in Hindustan Times 27 June). It is apparent that
Maoists want to target this investment particularly in keeping with the
local aspirations which will not be fully satiated given that the
development is taking place only in terms of extraction of iron ore and
other minerals.
The February Congress of the Maoists had very clearly identified
economic targets as the main focus of the organization in the days
ahead. This was evident when reports of involvement of Naxal over ground
workers were noticed in rioting in West Bengal�s SEZ agitation. The
general mobilization of the group is now likely to intensify and it is
understood to be making inroads into urban areas as well. The Naxals had
tried to justify their opposition to SEZs terming the very concept of
economic zone as a modern version of the old �zamindari� system. The
minutes of the meeting show the Maoists� plan to arm locals where SEZs
are proposed. They have subsequently worked on it to transform their
current �guerrilla� units into �mobile wings� which can strike in
various parts of the country and then disappear. These units had, in
fact, also looked for new recruits among debt-ridden farmers in
Maharashtra and Punjab during the last three months.
According to the Maoists� list of targets, the projects, which the
Naxals have identified on their hit-list, also include the bauxite
mining project of the Jindals in Visakhapatnam, the Polavaram irrigation
project, steel plants proposed by Tatas, Essar and Jindals in
Chattisgarh, the Centre�s proposed railway line in the
Rajhara-Raighat-Jagdalpur sector, Posco�s steel plants (under
construction) in Orissa, power plants proposed by Reliance in Uttar
Pradesh and the Kosi irrigation project in northern Bihar.
The successful conduct of the bandh on 26 and 27 June enabled the
Maoists to prove their hold over economic activity structure in the
mineral rich central Indian provinces of Jharkhand and Chattisgarh. This
is just the beginning of a new strategy which will have larger
ramifications, as it may strangulate a number of industries in the
country dependent on coal and iron ore from the two states. The
ineffectiveness of the state machinery is evident with lack of grass
roots policing restricting the reach of the police. Major review of
policing techniques and commitment of the khaki at the grass roots level
will see some improvement in the situation else the national economy is
likely to be held to ransom in the days ahead. Apart from counter Naxal
operations, better management of land acquisition in SEZs to prevent
exploitation of the issue by Maoists is essential.
The overall Naxal situation continues to be grim even as the government
has succeeded in ensuring peaceful passage of the economic blockade. The
key issue is the resolve of the Naxals to attack development with the
India growth story making the headlines. Counter Naxal measures being
undertaken at present through a revamp of the police and intelligence
infrastructure in the states were long overdue. The reach of these is
likely to be limited over the next few years till the organisation
stabilizes and produces effective results. A sustained pressure to
evolve and implement a coordinated strategy will attain success.
Meanwhile the influx of IB officers in Chattisgarh including the
governor indicates predominance of a policing approach as well as
control by the Centre in the state which has a government under the
opposition Bhartiya Janata Party. Simultaneously a development approach
rather than purely policing measures would provide better response. A
well balanced strategy to enhance the reach of the state in all respects
from policing to development sustained over a period of 5 to 10 years
alone will show results in the long run.
July 7, 2007
Top
|
Opinion