|
|
Perspective
Thankless Jobs
by
J. Ajithkumar
Job
satisfaction is a myth and at best only an illusion. At one time I used
to envy the tennis professionals because I thought they are earning
millions of dollars for doing something they enjoy most. But soon I
realised that it happens only during a brief period at the very
beginning of their careers. Playing Tennis soon becomes a high earning
job for them rather than a game to enjoy. The associated expectations
and shortfalls make it just as worse as any other job. They will soon
start looking at winning and losing games in terms of millions of
dollars. Dissatisfaction, delusion and demoralisation set in. A game for
pleasure becomes yet another reason for his or her BP to go up. The job
in hand becomes a thankless one and turns out to the main reason for
grievance, rather than self-gratification.
When we look at any job, there is always another entity that is at the
other end viz. the employer. If it is an individual we are totally at
the mercy of his or her whims and fancies. But most of the time it is
impersonal in the form of a company or a corporation. None of the
employees own the company but all the employees have a stake in it. And
all those who hold company positions are only temporary occupants doing
their part in the running of the institution. The character and
characteristics of the individuals do matter in the company operations,
but what will matter most with regard to satisfaction of employees would
be the company policies and tradition. That is why we find very
enthusiastic employees in medium companies making minor profits and
highly unsatisfied ones in giant companies making huge profits. Let us
take two typical scenarios in which employees, especially the white
collared ones, find themselves most of the times.
Record and Remuneration
In an impersonal setup the individuals are not very important and there
are companies with their policies exactly in line with this. In such
companies you and me are just ‘identified working bodies’ in the company
records. Our roles and responsibilities are well defined and we are
expected to know our bosses, sub-ordinates, colleagues. Our attendance
is recorded and our performance is recorded in terms of our output
against expected work. Records are maintained for efficiency and
productivity. Our bosses assign works to us and our subordinates expect
the same from us. All these efforts jointly make up the company records
for a period of profits or loss. And all employees are paid
remunerations for the efforts they have put in.
Any remuneration is actually a compensation for the losses incurred. If
employees are paid monthly remunerations, it means that the employer is
acknowledging the ‘losses’ incurred by them. What can be the loss of an
employee other than his or her time that could have been employed in
more enjoyable but un-remunerative efforts? The employee is continuing
to be in company records out of compulsion rather than liking. It is
definitely not a case of criminal exploitation but one of tying down the
individual in the records of a company. He or she is not enjoying the
work but has no better alternative to earn a living. Or the individual
is too timid to upset the status quo and explore better avenues.
Recognition and Rewards
The other extreme in an employer-employee relationship is that of
recognition and rewards. In place of recording the presence and actions
of employees, it is possible to recognise their presence and actions.
Such concepts and companies may be utopian, but there is plenty of scope
for experimenting with newer types of organisational structures for
making impersonal companies much more personal. The olden trusteeship
concept of Mahatma Gandhi and ultra modern virtual companies that can be
operated on the net offer enough food for thoughts on organisational
structures that can be run on the basis of recognition and rewards. The
crux is on recognising the contribution of individual elements and
rewarding them.
Rewards invariably mean recognition and that is what makes it nobler
than remuneration. The same amount given to an employee as remuneration
or reward will bring about totally different effects on performance.
Companies that reward their employees for their contribution in addition
to remuneration for their efforts are the best that can survive any
threat. The multiplier effect of reward on top of remuneration can reach
exponential levels. Many of us must have watched the effects of token
rewards on our children. The results will be as good, if not more, if
the same technique is played on us by our own employers, provided it is
a little more money in addition to the remunerative salary
Any cursory look at the companies in our neighbourhood would easily lead
us to the conclusion that most of them follow the ‘record-remuneration’
model. The reasons are very simple – robots are easier to manage than
humans who need motivation and rewards for performance. Bigger and more
established a company is, chances are higher that it follows only a
record-remuneration policy towards its employees. It is enough that the
individuals in such set-ups do only what is expected of them. There will
not be recognition for attempting anything positive outside one’s scope
and chances of a punishment cannot be ruled out also. In such a
scenario, it should not be surprising to realise that most of us are
doing thankless jobs and that too for companies that are too impersonal
and insensitive to the welfare of the employees.
February
24, 2007
Image
under license with Gettyimages.com
Top
|
Perspective
|
|