The ideational convergence
of contemporary globalization and its influence is a fact India prefers
to avoid.
As a foggy morning descended upon the Thames, I got ready for a shower
to begin yet another week at the office. Without my glasses I can see as
much as a person with normal eyesight could on that morning. My dodgy
boiler had overheated the shower, and the excruciating pain of standing
under the fiery water was unbearable. But my body got accustomed after a
while and it started feeling sort of comfy.
That weekend I was to go on a whirlwind trip to Calcutta , flying in
from Mumbai on Saturday morning, only to fly back out to London on
Sunday morning. In the olden days, the mere thought of flying back to
India sent waves of joy through my body. I used to feel the pull of the
umbilical chord when I used to get on the return flight back to London .
But not anymore. These days the thought of flying back to India
irritates me. No, these are not the mutterings of a fossilized old man-
I am mere another of the technocratic monstrosities that work in the
glossy buildings of London’s Canary Wharf (or New York’s Manhattan for
that matter) and pass judgement on the country I am eager to disown- oh
when will I qualify for a British passport?
The pain that I felt initially by standing underneath a burning shower
is precisely why I try to steer clear of India these days. People who
live in the country day in and day out have become acclimatized to the
pain, to the extent that they are oblivious to it. But people like me
who go in and come out have to bear the full brunt of the pain.
Oh here we go again- another spoilt brat of a NRI who deserted his
country giving us sermons on how to do things! In fact, India’s ground
realities- although tragic- are not the most problematic aspect of its
current state at all. Yes, out of Mumbai’s 20-odd baggage conveyer belts
only two worked (each in opposite ends of the terminal and nobody being
quite sure where the luggage was going to be strewn upon, people kept
going to and fro), and I had to bribe the airport official to get on the
bus that connects the domestic and the international terminal. Yes,
there was pollution, traffic jams, dirty toilets, people using mobile
phones on the plane- and so on and so forth. But all this doesn’t
penetrate beyond my skin.
I was born and raised in Calcutta. My parents weren’t exactly
comfortable during my childhood, and have worked very hard to attain a
stable middle class status only by now. I may not be a landless laborer
from Orissa, but I’ve shared a bathroom with a frog, a snake and about a
hundred spiders. I’ve lived without a phone and a color television for
most of my time in India. I’ve cried for the umpteenth time in front of
my father, begging him to take me on the taxi, hating the torturous
experience of being crammed inside one of those steel cages passed off
as buses, but knowing equally well that my old man would not put me
through this if he had a choice. I’ve sat in an auto rickshaw with a bus
emitting all its CO2 at my face. As an American would probably say-
“Been there, done that, got the T-shirt.”
Today the stakes are much higher. Earlier in the week a colleague who’s
from Chennai was boasting that one of his friends had recently made out
with one of India’s most famous cricket players in a London nightclub
and had later found him too dehaati and was ignoring his calls. Whether
this was true or not I don’t know, but the overflowing crowd of skimpily
dressed girls (with ogling men nearby) outside a Park Street nightclub
jostling to get in was certainly true. “No one sleeps on a Saturday
night. Welcome to Calcutta sir”, was the rather brazen welcome I
received from a heavily makeup wearing fluently English-speaking
receptionist at my hotel. That could’ve been Mayfair or Trafalgar
Square.
Francis Fukuyama heralded the victory of free market liberalism and
Western democracy in his The End of History. Whether that strand of
Western philosophy has finally proved to be mankind’s destiny I am not
equipped to judge. What I will say is that European history, knowledge,
culture, science, civilization and ideas have become the prima facie
point from which the world is understood, not just by Westerners but by
everyone. What we understand by democracy, freedom, liberalism,
economics, etc. is determined by our mastery of one or more branches of
the Western knowledge system. We may think that we are reading about our
country’s past when we read Indian history. In reality, history matters
only as far as historiography, i.e. the way history is written. Whether
it is E H Carr’s notion of the omnipresent progress or Leopold von
Ranke’s aim of absolute factual history or Marx’s class history, today
history is written, consciously or subconsciously, from a Western
framework. In essence, we are studying our history as if we were
outsiders.
In essence, we don’t really know what our history is, as its always been
narrated to us. Indian historiography is dead. As is Indian philosophy.
Indians have dropped the baton of knowledge once proudly held by
Chanakya Vishnugupta all the way down to Mohandas Gandhi, and have
resorted to wholesale borrowing. Scholars studying Indian philosophy
don’t realize that they’re doing so through Western systems of thought.
Some people might advocate an interaction between civilizations to
foster synthesis of ideas. Lofty aims. But India’s own civilization is
decaying, and has not evolved internally for many centuries. The West’s
knowledge nexus is admirably sophisticated and world-spanning. Each
minute strand of this nexus has evolved internally through friction,
correction and collaboration with various ideas, refining itself at each
stage for the past 500 years or so. From the minute details of
accounting practices all the way up to the study of natural sciences- on
all fronts India possesses no comparable degree of complexity in its
indigenous knowledge pool.
India is not alone in its plight. China has suffered a similar fate. But
we have gone one step further. If a poll was taken today amidst people
aged 18-30 at Calcutta’s top colleges, hotels, nightclubs, restaurants
and other public places, the relationship between the respondents and
their lingua franca would probably be as follows-
Hing/Benglish- 70%
English- 20%
Vernacular- 10%
I never actually conducted a poll, but a trip to any city shopping mall
would vindicate my claims. It is often astounding how Indians treat the
ability to speak English as a social mobility tool- catapulting them
among the motley crew of the elite. Worse, I seem to get worse service
whenever I decide to give my Hindi or Bengali a good practice at any
upmarket restaurant. My British public school English gets me a long
way, more than it should. Language is not just a communication tool- it
is also the device through which we articulate our thoughts and form
ideas. Each language has its straitjacketing features, and ideas are
truncated to fit that straitjacket. Knowing English is certainly no bad
thing- but using your prowess to scoff at another human being who
doesn’t know it smacks not of cleverness, but slavishness of the first
degree. Just for the record, not one of the conversations I witnessed
through out my entire 40-odd hours in India between youngish urban
people was in any native tongue. Nor was anyone wearing anything
resembling some sort of Indian attire. Is it purely their choice as
consumers? Does free will exist in today’s world with its hegemonic
discourses and temptations? Are identities formed naturally or within
pre-determined environment that subconsciously automates our behavior?
In other words, its way more ‘cool’ and ‘hip’ to wear jeans, man!
Consumerism with a big C has hit urban India immensely. The Financial
Times and The Economist just can’t publish enough articles about India’s
burgeoning middle class. My friends in India seem to be more up to date
on the latest Justin Timberlake single or Nokia phone models than I ever
cared to be. What is interesting is the tendency to overexert oneself to
stay ahead of the game. It seems odd how people in India can rattle off
foreign brands and scandals surrounding Paris Hilton, but don’t know how
to get from Park Street to Shyambazar. “I just can’t wait until Marks &
Spencer comes to Calcutta. Its an amazing American retail brand, jaanish?”,
one of my friends said expectantly. I wasn’t sure whether I should
correct him or wait for a patriotic Brit to do the job who would laugh
his socks off to think Indians transferred the ownership of one of
Britain’s most respected high street brands across the Atlantic.
Similarly, I am not quite sure since when and how American fast food
joints became the symbol of prestige for the middle class to dine in-
apparently in Calcutta it seems to be the case.
I am undoubtedly being a little unfair. It is a fact that the modernity
that we see around us is a product of the West, and articulating its
tentacles is impossible within the rather primitive knowledge structures
of countries who suffered from colonialism, like India. But the point is
not about shifting blame- it is about pointing out the road India has
taken and the direction its headed towards. Its almost as if questioning
this journey is somehow un-patriotic. Rabindranath Tagore certainly did
when he sighed that India has been following the chariot of the West for
the past hundreds of years, choked by the dust and deafened by the
noise, and yet we never asked whether this was indeed progress and not
caring to avoid the pitfalls in its path. Swami Vivekananda once rather
provocatively wondered whether there were any Brahmins left in India-
true Brahmins who were the guardians of knowledge and not just executors
and emulators.
When I finally came out of baggage claim in Heathrow’s Terminal 4 upon
my return, I breathed a sigh of relief. Here I was, moments away from
taking the tube and getting back to my flat. This had been my most
depressing trip to India so far- the earlier one being slightly less so
as I had travelled through many remote villages, speaking to scores of
people that I felt were those who were India’s last hope. That evening
in the gathering dark, witnessing a beautiful sunset on the river I
realized that the sun was going down on my country- if there was
anything left to be called that. It may sound slightly cynical to most
people, but asking yourself the following fundamental question might
make the reader a little circumspect- “What is it that sets us apart as
an Indian from someone from another country?” Is it our education? No,
since the methodologies and the content are both emulated. Is it our
family? No, since traditional relationship and family structures are
already shaky and will continue to be so as the older generation pass
away. Is it our religion? No, since we are increasingly adopting the
‘us’ and ‘them’ outlook so alien to India’s ameliorative history. Is it
our language? No, because we think speaking our native tongue is beneath
our dignity. Is it our outlook towards life? No, because we want big
money, lots of women (or men, depending on where you stand) and binge
drinking sprees at the nightclub every Saturday.
So how can we call ourselves Indian and our country India? Aren’t they
both increasingly becoming a relic of the past, preserved just in
Western history books? Often the process of decay is sub-conscious, as
the whole reality of existence around us is seeped in Western
discourses. But that still doesn’t change the fact that the thug from
the most shady parts of London’s East End is more complete in his
identity than I am- at least he is part of the historical development
and evolution of his country’s civilization. Am I? I don’t think so.
It seems only yesterday that I remember myself throwing my school bag on
the bed after coming back from school and racing outside to play cricket
with my friends. That’s all our lives consisted of. But my younger
cousin today seems more interested in hitting the latest hukka bar in
town, or getting the latest computer game than a good old mad dash in
the mud for a game of football. My friends think playing cricket on a
Saturday night is ‘sad’ and something ‘losers’ do. As I type this line
at 2 a.m. in the morning, I hear English with Indian accent outside my
window as a number of young men and women drink the night away, throwing
the empty bottles in the river, unaware of what else they may be
throwing away at the same time.
I can’t bear to see my country slip away like this, so I prefer to stay
thousands of miles away in denial. I pray every week at my local temple.
India needs every one of them if it is to survive as a civilization and
not just a geographical entity. But prayers may just not be enough.
India aims to be a world leader, but leadership is won through powerful
ideas and visions, not by acquiring a nuclear arsenal. Adam Smith and
John Locke’s ideas run the world today, and the power of ideas is the
greatest power mankind has ever witnessed or will ever witness. For it
lends the thinker power over hearts and minds, the power to shape our
thoughts.
Where’s the old man in a loin cloth when we really need him?
Boloji.com is owned and managed by
Boloji Media Inc Privacy Policy |
Disclaimer No part of this Internet site may
be reproduced without prior written permission of the copyright holder.