|
|
Random Thoughts
Quantum
Consciousness & Entanglement,
India & United States � Part
Two
by
Gaurang Bhatt, MD
Entanglement
 When atoms of Calcium are brought to a high energy state and are allowed
to return to a lower energy state while in a fixed position, each atom
emits two photons which fly off in opposite directions. If the spin of
the photons is measured in the same axis (vertical, horizontal, front to
back or any other axis) then the two photons have opposite direction
spins (clockwise and anticlockwise). According to quantum theory,
subatomic particles have latent spins in all axes but once the spin is
measured along one axis, it is never a fractional one and after
measurement along one axis, it is not possible to detect or measure the
particle�s spin direction along other axis. Many physicists have done
this experiment and the spin of the particles measured at various
distances. The farthest distance apart between the particles was eleven
kilometers. Einstein could not accept that two particles separated in
space could influence the behavior or properties of each other. This
would have violated his theory of special relativity as one particle
would be communicating with the other faster than the speed of light. He
called it spooky action at a distance and remarked that god does not
play dice. He claimed that the two particles were programmed at birth to
have opposite spins.
John Bell got the Nobel prize in physics for thinking up an experiment
carried out decades later when more sophisticated technology and
instruments became available. These were the ability to measure the
direction of spin of particles in the vertical, horizontal and front to
back axis (or any other axis). In experiments where the spin direction
was measured along the same axis at any angle from the vertical,
horizontal or front to back, the experimenter always got opposite
results for the two particles. Bell�s theorem was simple. The spin
direction can be either clockwise or anti-clockwise. If one assumes that
the one sided photon is programmed, say clockwise for vertical,
anti-clockwise for horizontal and clockwise for front to back, its
program would be CAC. In that case the opposite side photon would have
to be programmed ACA.
If the experiment was randomized so that two independent experimenters
measured the photon spin in any one of the three directions, the results
would be CA, CC, CA for vertical axis on one photon and vertical,
horizontal and front to back axis on the second. The next set for
horizontal axis on the first photon and vertical, horizontal and front
to back on the second photon would be AA, AC, AA respectively. For front
to back axis on the first photon and three in the same order on the
second photon would be CA, CC, CA respectively. Of the nine results, you
will notice that, four are the same (AA or CC) and five are different.
Thus a series of random tests should give opposite results more than 50%
of the time. Yet when repeated experiments are carried out the results
always show an agreement of 50% but never greater. This proves that the
two photons are not pre-programmed and do not have a fixed spin until
measured, but if measured along the same axis they are always opposite.
Once the spin on one particle is measured the second entangled particle
takes on the opposite spin along the same axis.
This raises strange questions. Was the choice of switching off or on the
detector in part one of my article pre-ordained? If so then there is no
free will. If the particles are entangled at birth and yet free to
choose their spin until measurement, what is reality? By the way despite
our Indian habit of entangling all inventions to our scriptures and
philosophy, quantum physics has nothing to do with the dance of Shiva,
Buddhism or Taoism. If you still believe the opposite, you should
nominate me for the Nobel Prize in physics, as I have found two large
particles (human beings) entangled at a distance of 9000 miles. They are
the president of the US (Bush or Obama) and Manmohan Singh. As soon as a
mere thought passes through the president�s mind, Manmohan Singh
immediately and spontaneously does the same thing not the opposite.
- Iran despite not in
violation of the NPT should be referred to the IAEA.
Manmohan Singh�Yes Sahib
- India�s Petroleum
minister Aiyar should be fired for promoting the IPI gas pipeline.
Manmohan Singh�Jee Huzoor
- India must sign the
Civil Nuclear Deal without any guarantees of supply, promise of
enrichment technology and agree to intrusive inspections of its
nuclear facilities.
Manmohan Singh� Jo Hukoom or I will fall on my sword.
- Pakistan is a victim
of terror not its source.
Manmohan Singh in Havana �India and Pakistan are friends and both
are victims of terror.
- Obama thinks India
must resume talks with Pakistan to get the US out of the Afghan
fire.
Manmohan Singh �Yes Bwana (at Egypt NAM meeting). What Pakistan
does to us in Kashmir is like what we do to it in Baluchistan. India
Pakistan Bhai Bhai!
- Fire Kamal Nath
from the trade portfolio. He is unwilling to resuscitate the Doha
round and agree to our unfair trade practices.
Manmohan Singh �OK Boss, done.
- We have the right to
inspect any arms that you buy from us at exorbitant prices and you
need our permission to use them even after you have fully paid for
them. We have the right to use your ports, airfields and you have to
supply us what we need during war, if necessary. So sign the End
User Arms Agreement now.
Manmohan Singh� Bows head and agrees
- You will not get any
nuclear enrichment technology as we have changed the terms of the
civilian nuclear treaty at the recent G8 meeting.
Manmohan Singh --Your wish is my thought. I will give up my
nation�s agreements without restriction (with Russia) to be
entangled with you as your subordinate. Your foreign policy is mine.
I know you are in debt up to your gazoos to China and will not help
India if China attacks us, but I will abandon old friends for the
entanglement with you.
One psychologist friend said to
me My diagnosis is wrong and the above is not quantum entanglement.
Maybe Manmohan Singh has no free will and he is a Zombie (Look up
psychological definition of Zombie). Another friend who is a comedian
said, maybe Manmohan Singh is playing the part of a ventriloquist�s
dummy. Simultaneously, all three of us said �you have got to hand it to
Sonia. She is like the nuclear strong force which increases with
distance, unlike gravity, electromagnetism and the weak force, so she
can throw her voice to large distances and alter it to sound like that
of a man.
Part One
August 2,
2009
Image under license with
Gettyimages.com
Top
|
Random Thoughts
|
|
