|
|
||
|
Home | Hindi | Kabir | Poetry | Workshop | BoloKids | Writers | Contribute | Search | Contact | Share This Page! Shop Online |
|||
|
|
|||
|
Society Is India a safe place for children? When a recent poll (by Reuter NetAlert) named India the sixth most dangerous country in the world for children, a daily newspaper's editorial declared it was too much. Is India more dangerous for children than war-torn regions like Afghanistan and Chechnya (also in the list)? Doesn't the word `dangerous' evoke images of war, rape, kidnapping and landmines, something the newspaper felt is "not descriptive of the landscape of every day India". Sadly, such rumblings of patriotic indignation and verbal quibbling evade the main question, which is: Is India actually a dangerous place for children? Rather than get caught in comparisons, let's take a closer look at just what are the risks children live with in this country. Take the recent story of Prince, a boy of four who fell into a 60-feet deep pit while playing with his friends. People all over the country prayed for the child, who was finally rescued by army men. The boy's composure during the 48-hour ordeal was the talk of the town. Today, nobody
wants to know what happened to the contractor who dug the 60-feet pit;
or whether the authorities plan to fix responsibility for this disaster.
Was the pit less dangerous than a landmine? Can we ensure it will not
happen again? News of brutality against children comes from all states. Recently, a boy, 14, was beaten to death by his schoolteacher in Gujarat. In 2006, a child was found in shackles in a boarding-school; several children were kidnapped for ransom or indoctrination (Jammu and Kashmir and Bihar) while on the way to school; and many children committed suicide due to examination pressure - all in different parts of India. These were among the privileged children in India - at least they were attending school! We pride ourselves for our love of children, but sentimentality is not the same thing as love. Do we listen to what children need, and try to provide it - or do we simply pull them into the violent world we have created, letting them be traumatized and brutalized? We need to remind ourselves that danger is danger whether it is threat to life due to guns and bombs, or due to lack of food, water, shelter, clothing, and adequate care. Children
cannot be safe and secure if their basic needs are not fulfilled. Are we
providing children with this basic `human security' - which is their
birthright? All the available data suggests otherwise. Around 30 per
cent babies in India are born with low birth-weight; and 47 per cent
children under three are underweight. Child malnutrition affects
physical and cognitive growth, and is linked to increased mortality.
Every year, over 1.2 million Indian children under five die of
malnutrition. Under-nutrition rates in South Asia, including especially India, are nearly double those in sub-Saharan Africa. Half the world's undernourished children live in South Asia (State of the World's Children, UNICEF, 2006). One contributory factor is that women in South Asia tend to have lower status and less decision-making power than women in sub-Saharan Africa, thus limiting their ability to access resources for their own and their children's health and nutrition. Caste, class and gender heighten inequalities in India. The media rarely focuses on children other than that of the elite. Even amongst the elite classes, there is a high demand for the male child; families are patriarchal and authoritarian; and domestic violence and child abuse are common in many homes. Choice, creativity and independent thinking among children are discouraged and frowned upon. India is also
home to one of the highest population of child laborers. Toddlers help
with gathering fuel and firewood, fetching and carrying. Little ones
take care of infant siblings. Millions of children work for an income in
formal and informal sectors - including hazardous occupations like
manufacture of firecrackers. So far, the examples/data quoted belong to `better-off' India. We have not enquired into the state of children in regions where conflicts rage, such as Kashmir, the North-East, or Gujarat (in the 2002 riots). We have not asked about farmers' children in Maharashtra or Andhra Pradesh whose fathers - unable to repay debts - have committed suicide. We have still to ask about the millions of `differently-abled' children who are challenged visually, orthopedically, or mentally etc. Nor have we attended, yet, to the conditions of child beggars, drug addicts, street children or children who are victims of human trafficking. Female
infanticide still exists in India - reported from states as far apart as
Rajasthan, Bihar and Tamil Nadu. Sex-selective abortion or `female
feticide's widespread - threatening the existence of girl children even
before they are born. But mere lip service is not enough. The Reuter AlertNet poll, should be taken as a red signal: literally, an alert: a call for introspection, rethinking and appropriate action. August 6, 2006 By arrangement with Women's Feature Service The Week of August 6, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
Analysis |
Architecture |
Astrology |
Ayurveda |
Book Reviews |
Buddhism |
Cartoons | Cinema |
Computing |
Culture |
Dances |
|
Home | Bolography | BoloKids | Columns | Hindi | Kabir | Poetry | Quotes | Workshop | Writers | Contribute | Search | Contact |
|
|