"Since when has the
burqa (veil worn by Muslim women) become sacrosanct?" asks an irate
Madeeha Gohar, owner of Lahore-based Ajoka Theatre that has been in
the news lately for its production, 'Burqavaganza'. "We are not
ridiculing the burqa but the use of it - and even if we are, so
what? There is no religious sanction attached to this piece of
clothing," she adds, her tone verging on rebellious.
But the play's writer and director, Shahid Nadeem, is not unhappy
that it has stirred up some controversy - for he'd be "utterly
disappointed" if that were not the case. "It would mean I've been
unable to convey the 'other' point of view," he explains.
Authorities in Pakistan
have been urged to impose restrictions on 'Burqavaganza', currently
being staged in Lahore - the cultural capital of the country - after
five Islamist MPs raised the issue in the parliament. Accusing the
theatre group of ridiculing Islamic injunctions, the MPs demanded action
under blasphemy laws.
"Artistes," says Gohar, "are prophetic and have the sensitivity to see
trends." She views with foreboding at this issue veering towards
fundamentalism. But so far, the theatre group has not been served with
any official, written notification. "We heard about the ban through the
media," she says. The government-owned Alhamra Arts Council was
reluctant to rent out their premises after the so-called ban. "In art,
you resort to satire and use symbols that are easily identifiable and
familiar. The burqa has been used as a metaphor, and symbolizes
Italianization and the imposition of a belief system held by a very
small minority," explains Gohar.

At 59, with over four dozen stage plays ('Burqavaganza' is his fourth
attempt at direction) to his credit, Nadeem has never once been on the
right side of those in power. During military dictator Zia-ul-Haq's
regime, Nadeem was told there was no place for people like him in
Pakistan. He was jailed in 1978 and on release in 1979, went into exile.
He returned to Pakistan in 1987. "I couldn't stay away from my country,
and had to come back," he says.
"I am not asking for trouble but I want to point out the contradictions
in society and will keep on doing so," says an unperturbed Nadeem, who
claims there is a strong feminist in him. "Not just because I want
Pakistani woman to be emancipated, but also because I believe women's
empowerment is the only way for the growth of a civil and democratic
society."
Gohar, too, remains unruffled by the impending threats posed by
religious zealots. "This is not the first time. We have been reproached
before, but never succumbed to censorship," she says.
While Gohar did not find the reaction of parliamentarians of the
religious alliance, Muttahida Majlis-e-Amal (MMA), shocking, she was
disappointed with the "government buckling under the pressure of this
fundamentalist lobby".
She claims that by bowing down to this minority, chinks have been
created "in the façade of a government that is supposedly enlightened
and moderate. This farce was to appease the West and international
donors. Deep down, it [the government] is still scared of the religious
lobby".
However, the government does not believe that it is taking sides. Says
Jalaluddin Sohail, spokesman of the federal Ministry of Culture, "We
have not seen the play and though it comes under the purview of the
provincial government, we have suggested to them to first see it and
then take action against objectionable portions... If it [the play]
hurts any section of society, we will do something."
For her part, Gohar is adamant and has declined their request to send
them the play on a CD. "We've asked them to call us to Islamabad. We
will stage the play there in front of the National Assembly's standing
committee on culture. If after watching they find some parts
objectionable we may be willing to do something," she explains.
The play may well have passed unnoticed, but the controversy it has
stirred in the parliament has generated much interest. "Some 3,000
people must've seen the play," Gohar estimates, adding, "Obviously, it
has caused a certain amount of curiosity and more and more people are
coming to see it." The venue had been moved from the government-owned
Lahore Arts Council to a private theatre.
Ironically, the controversy over the play follows the recent stand-off
between the government and the female vigilante baton-wielding students
of Jamia Hafsa (JH), a seminary of Lal Masjid in Islamabad that has been
demanding the enforcement of the 'shariah' (Islamic law) across the
country.
The play had been written and was being rehearsed before the JH
situation arose, states Gohar. "It was not inspired by the JH episode
but we certainly added some elements from it," she explains.
Ghazi Abdul Rashid, spokesman of the Lal Masjid administration, has not
seen the play. "If it is poking fun at purdah (the practice of observing
a veil), then it's wrong, as it means making fun of Islam." However,
Rashid adds that there is no problem "if the play is exposing the evils
behind the veil".
But shouldn't the religious fraternity take such satire in their stride?
"No, not if it hurts the sensitivities of scores of people. Next you'd
say we should not have reacted to the cartoon made to violate Prophet
Mohammad."
The brochure of the play states clearly that it is not being critical of
any one's religious beliefs or dress preference, but of the hypocrisy
and double standards and the feudal/tribal mindset.
Interestingly, there are both men and women actors - depicting
politicians, terrorists and the police - who wear the burqa. "We all
know men too wear burqas when it suits them. Taliban leader Mullah Omar
had escaped unnoticed from Afghanistan wearing the burqa. There were
some male students who donned the burqa during the JH upraising," says
Gohar.
Actor Sarfaraz Ansari is cast in multiple roles in 'Burqavaganza'. He
gets the chance to wear a burqa and play a minister, a terrorist and
even a transvestite. "I liked my role as a minister the best. The
minister rails against the anti-burqa propagandist and calls for a fight
against such 'evil' societal elements," describes Ansari. "I've been
acting on stage for the last 16 years; but if you ask me, this will
remain, without a doubt, my most memorable performance. There was not
only humour and wit but a lesson, too. People have refused to see a
deeper meaning in this," rues the actor.
Many have questioned the timing of the play, with the country being in
the throes of internal conflict. However, according to Karachi-based
classical dancer Sheema Kermani, 57, the play is being staged at a most
relevant time. "It is important not to let the rightists take over our
space... and I believe the government should support us rather than ban
such activities," she states.
Set up in 1983, Ajoka Theatre has been part of the struggle for a
secular, democratic, just and human, egalitarian Pakistan. "To fight
against fundamentalism is part of our vision," states Gohar.
June 10,
2007
By arrangement with
WFS
Top
|
Society