Mr. Vaidik’s Exalted Company! by Rajinder Puri SignUp
Boloji.com

Channels

In Focus

 
Analysis
Cartoons
Education
Environment
Opinion
Photo Essays
 
 

Columns

 
A Bystander's Diary
Business
Random Thoughts
 
 

Our Heritage

 
Architecture
Astrology
Ayurveda
Buddhism
Cinema
Culture
Festivals
Hinduism
History
People
Places
Sikhism
Spirituality
 
 

Society & Lifestyle

 
Health
Parenting
Perspective
Recipes
Society
Teens
Women
 
 

Creative Writings

 
Book Reviews
Computing
Ghalib's Corner
Humor
Individuality
Literary Shelf
Love Letters
Memoirs
Quotes
Stories
Travelogues
Workshop
 
 
Analysis Share This Page
Mr. Vaidik’s Exalted Company!
by Dr. Rajinder Puri Bookmark and Share

There have been voiced strident demands that the journalist in spotlight, Mr. Ved Pratap Vaidik, should be arrested for committing sedition. What was his crime? He met with Pakistani terrorist mastermind Hafiz Saeed and made statements about the future of Kashmir while in Pakistan.

What did he say about Kashmir?

He said that both Pakistan Occupied Kashmir (POK) and Indian held Kashmir should have a common assembly, should have free movement of peoples, and for all practical purpose unite so that they might enjoy a sense of freedom and peace as people in India do.

I shall not comment on the practicality or otherwise of this proposal. It suffers from the same inadequacy that President Musharraf’s proposal did of joint management of the two Kashmir segments.

President Musharraf proposed free movement of goods and people across the Line of Control and joint management of Kashmir territories held by India and Pakistan. I pointed out then that this could not be implemented unless the armies of both nations ceased to be in contention and became fully cooperative. That in turn suggested a joint defence treaty that would enable both armies to wipe out terrorism. That in turn suggested a full fledged arrangement similar to a confederation or one similar to the European Union. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh endorsed the Musharraf formula and said that borders should be made irrelevant.

Superior to both suggestions was what Pandit Nehru proposed to President Ayub Khan in 1964 through the message conveyed by his emissary, Sheikh Abdullah. Nehru proposed an Indo-Pakistan confederation with Kashmir acting as the bridge between both nations. While the Sheikh was in Pakistan, Nehru died and the exercise was aborted. Nehru’s proposal went further than that of Musharraf and did not suffer from any inadequacy insofar as its feasibility was concerned.

Mr. Vaidik’s meeting with Hafiz Saeed has attracted severe criticism because the latter masterminded a terrorist attack against India on 26/11. But is not Hafiz Saeed indisputably supported either remotely or directly by the Pakistan government? Did not President Ayub Khan, the man Nehru reach out to, launch the 1965 war against India? Did not General Musharraf launch the Kargil engagement despite which Prime Minister Manmohan Singh conducted peace parleys with him? Therefore my question is simple.

If Mr. Vaidik deserves to be arrested for sedition and unpatriotic activity due to his views on Kashmir, would all those baying for his blood have demanded similar arrest of Pandit Nehru if he was alive, or of Mr. Manmohan Singh who can still be arrested? Question and condemn the actions of Mr. Vaidik by all means, but should critics lose all sense of proportion?

Share This:
18-Jul-2014
More by :  Dr. Rajinder Puri
 
Views: 611      Comments: 1

Comments on this Article

Comment I can’t go with your comparisons for the following reasons:

• Ayoub’s military action across the border occurred post the Nehru move
• Both Nehru and Singh were seeking peace with a neighbor as Heads of Governments through peaceful means

If your comparison is taken seriously, India should never seek dialogue with Pakistan because of Saeed, Ayoub’s action, Kargil and many other unpleasant incidents, and remain in eternal state of war. We can't do that even if Pakistan seems incorrigible.

I am not with those who call Vaidik a traitor and demand that he be tried for sedition and treason. The pro-Congress media is overplaying their cards. Nevertheless, he has touched a sensitive cord and stirred a hornets’ nest. That was avoidable. He should have acted more responsibly foreseeing the embarrassment his act would cause to BJP and Shri Modi. Unfortunately, he did otherwise, reminding me of a Sanskrit subhaashitam from Bhartruhari’s Niti Shatakam which I read just the other day:

“Wise men think well before acting; hurried, hasty actions taken without thinking bring about harmful results which burn and pierce like a weapon for a long time to come.”

madathilnair
07/19/2014 03:37 AM




Name *
Email ID
 (will not be published)
Comment *
Characters
Verification Code*
Can't read? Reload
Please fill the above code for verification.
 
Top | Analysis



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2018 All Rights Reserved
 
No part of this Internet site may be reproduced without prior written permission of the copyright holder
.