CVC’s Ouster: Right Decision for Wrong Reason by Rajinder Puri SignUp
Boloji.com

Channels

In Focus

 
Analysis
Cartoons
Education
Environment
Opinion
Photo Essays
 
 

Columns

 
A Bystander's Diary
Business
Random Thoughts
 
 

Our Heritage

 
Architecture
Astrology
Ayurveda
Buddhism
Cinema
Culture
Festivals
Hinduism
History
People
Places
Sikhism
Spirituality
 
 

Society & Lifestyle

 
Health
Parenting
Perspective
Recipes
Society
Teens
Women
 
 

Creative Writings

 
Book Reviews
Computing
Ghalib's Corner
Humor
Individuality
Literary Shelf
Love Letters
Memoirs
Quotes
Stories
Travelogues
Workshop
 
 
Analysis Share This Page
CVC’s Ouster: Right Decision for Wrong Reason
by Dr. Rajinder Puri Bookmark and Share

The Supreme Court (SC) has set aside the appointment of Central Vigilance Commissioner Mr PJ Thomas. The SC decision was overdue. Indeed, it was too long overdue. The court ordered the removal of the CVC because in its view he shared responsibility for the occurrence of corruption in the earlier case that was pending against him in a Kerala court. But what if Mr Thomas had been blameless in the earlier case? 

Should he not have been removed even then because neither could his functioning as the CVC have credibility while a court case was pending against him, and nor would the pending court being heard against him have credibility when it involved a verdict on a functioning CVC? The SC should have ordered the dismissal of the CVC as soon as the matter was put before it.  That is what the norms of a credible democracy demanded.

The norms of a credible democracy demand much more after the SC verdict.  The CVC approved the appointment of the current head of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). Should not that appointment be canceled until it is approved afresh by the new CVC? Furthermore, what punishment might be administered to the cabinet that approved the appointment of the CVC despite a court case pending against him? At best the SC can pass strictures against the government for its error. 

The CVC occupies a Constitutional post. The President of India appoints the CVC.  The CVC is accountable to the President of India. Surely the President who is maintained in office under considerable cost to the tax payer, and who is under solemn oath to “preserve and protect” the Constitution and Law, should not be considered a mindless zombie to quietly allow the Cabinet to make a palpably wrong appointment to a Constitutional post? Law Minister Moily after the SC judgment has opined that the system needs to be examined for rectification. Indeed it does. For a start a reappraisal with an open mind of the President’s role should be undertaken.       

The norms of a credible democracy would demand of course the resignation of the government by accepting responsibility for its questionable and possibly motivated decision to appoint a CVC not qualified to occupy the post. If the norms of a credible democracy had obtained in Indian politics this government should have resigned long ago. Now it depends only on the Indian electorate to ensure in the next general election that the norms of a credible democracy do matter in India.          
 

Share This:
03-Mar-2011
More by :  Dr. Rajinder Puri
 
Views: 1385      Comments: 0




Name *
Email ID
 (will not be published)
Comment *
Characters
Verification Code*
Can't read? Reload
Please fill the above code for verification.
 
Top | Analysis



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2018 All Rights Reserved
 
No part of this Internet site may be reproduced without prior written permission of the copyright holder
.