Rafale Rollback or Reliance? by Rajinder Puri SignUp
Boloji.com

Channels

In Focus

 
Analysis
Cartoons
Education
Environment
Opinion
Photo Essays
 
 

Columns

 
A Bystander's Diary
Business
Random Thoughts
 
 

Our Heritage

 
Architecture
Astrology
Ayurveda
Buddhism
Cinema
Culture
Festivals
Hinduism
History
People
Places
Sikhism
Spirituality
 
 

Society & Lifestyle

 
Health
Parenting
Perspective
Recipes
Society
Teens
Women
 
 

Creative Writings

 
Book Reviews
Computing
Ghalib's Corner
Humor
Individuality
Literary Shelf
Love Letters
Memoirs
Quotes
Stories
Travelogues
Workshop
 
 
Analysis Share This Page
Rafale Rollback or Reliance?
by Dr. Rajinder Puri Bookmark and Share

After the warning in these columns that the estimated Rs. 63000 crore Rafale fighter jet deal could create a bigger stink than Bofors, Defence Minister Mr. AK Antony ordered a departmental inquiry into the deal. The medium multi-role combat aircraft (MMRCA) awarded to the French company Dassault had been selected over its main competitor the Eurofighter Typhoon Jet fighter plane. But after Rafale had won the contract two Defence Ministry officials who were members of the contract negotiation committee raised questions about how the Rafale bid could have been considered the lowest. That compelled the Defence Minister to order the inquiry. The report of the inquiry has yet to be submitted but according to the grapevine the deal might be approved.

Approval of the deal should bring huge relief to Mr. Mukesh Ambani of Reliance. It might be recalled that mid February this year less than two weeks after Dassault won the Rafale bid, Reliance and Dassault signed a partnership pact to make Reliance the Indian private sector collaborator to manufacture Rafale planes in India. Rafale’s victory in the bid was not entirely smooth.

According to experts the competition for winning the bid was vitiated by changing goal posts and ignoring deadlines in order to favour Rafale. The original Multi-Role Combat Aircraft (MRCA) was converted into Medium Multi-Role Combat Aircraft (MMRCA). Until this change the Gripen, F-16E and an upgraded ageing Dassault’s Mirage 2000 were in the fray. Only after the change could Dassault withdraw Mirage 2000 to replace it with Rafale as the bidder.

According to experts with regard to maneuverability, electronic superiority and operating costs the Rafale during tests was bested by all its competitors. But ignoring procurement costs, operational costs and cycle costs the Gripen and F-16 were eliminated despite proven superiority in electronic and other specialized capabilities.  Rafale was at the bottom of each category. Only the Eurofighter Typhoon and Rafale were left in the competition. Eventually Rafale got the award. These are the views of some knowledgeable experts. Doubtless there would be other experts holding different views to prove that Rafale was the most deserving bidder. It would be reckless for lay persons to enter arguments between experts.

However, what cannot be ignored even by laymen is the incontrovertible fact that initially Rafale was the first to be eliminated from the competition. But then Dassault stated that it would enhance the performance of all systems of Rafale that did not meet with the requirements. The government thereby allowed Dassault to resubmit a fresh proposal for enhancing its capabilities! That allowed Rafale’s reinstatement and eventual winning of the award. On what basis was this unprecedented favour granted to Rafale?

It might be recalled that attention had already been drawn in these columns to thinly veiled allegations in the British media that Rafale was awarded the contract because of French President Sarkozy’s intervention and the influence exerted by the Nehru-Gandhi dynasty in favour of Rafale. It might also be recalled that Brazil’s Defence Minister Mr. Nelson Jobim was sacked for almost selecting the Rafale aircraft which was subsequently rejected by Brazilian government. Surely the permission given to Rafale to resubmit its tender after it was eliminated from the competition would heighten suspicions about financial irregularity in India’s deal? Can the fair names and reputation of the Ambanis as well as the Nehru-Gandhi dynasty members afford any such suspicion? Most important, can Defence Minister Mr. AK Antony who has no scandal attached to his name thus far afford a hasty decision?   
 

Share This:
05-Apr-2012
More by :  Dr. Rajinder Puri
 
Views: 1527      Comments: 2

Comments on this Article

Comment There is something about the sheer brazenness of this govt. on their openly corrupt deals which suggest that they are in collusion with foreign powers, esp the USA, that will ensure their power in perpetuity in India. Indian elections are "manageable" , thanks to the poorest quality EVMs .
The NDA's muted response means they know the writing on the wall.
A grim battle is on for the heart and soul of India.

seadog4227
05/05/2012 00:04 AM

Comment Is there anyone who will irrefutably expose scam in Raffale deal ? I am sure, based on lessons learned from ealier scandals, those politicians must have done better arrangements to save themselves and to prevent any spillage that would harm them.

Dinesh Kumar Bohre
05/04/2012 14:31 PM




Name *
Email ID
 (will not be published)
Comment *
Characters
Verification Code*
Can't read? Reload
Please fill the above code for verification.
 
Top | Analysis



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2018 All Rights Reserved
 
No part of this Internet site may be reproduced without prior written permission of the copyright holder
.