What's Wrong with Amour! by Ananya S Guha SignUp
Boloji.com

Channels

In Focus

 
Analysis
Cartoons
Education
Environment
Opinion
Photo Essays
 
 

Columns

 
A Bystander's Diary
Business
Random Thoughts
 
 

Our Heritage

 
Architecture
Astrology
Ayurveda
Buddhism
Cinema
Culture
Festivals
Hinduism
History
People
Places
Sikhism
Spirituality
 
 

Society & Lifestyle

 
Health
Parenting
Perspective
Recipes
Society
Teens
Women
 
 

Creative Writings

 
Book Reviews
Computing
Ghalib's Corner
Humor
Individuality
Literary Shelf
Love Letters
Memoirs
Quotes
Stories
Travelogues
Workshop
 
 
Society Share This Page
What's Wrong with Amour!
by Ananya S Guha Bookmark and Share
Recently a film director made the pugnacious statement that the Hindi film's image of the woman has always been that of the 'harassed' individual subject to lewd approaches by the hero of  the movie, and finally succumbing to his charms. The idea is that the male is projected with a macho image, and the woman initially resisting to his overtures finally giving in and capitulating. This is a fresh salvo fired by a maker of Hindi movies himself. The Times Of India initiated a debate on this, and one of the respondents found the statement self contradictory, as the man who made this castigation, himself directs such movies. Moreover the writer went on to give examples as to how untrue this was, as many of the films projected the heroine herself making advances!

In whichever way you see it both these projections of the heroine, one harassed and the other playing the pivotal role to run after the man, portray a denigrating world view of women. I am sorry to say, but this is true that the Hindi film has shown women as objects of desire, where the macho driven hero continually persists to tease and torment his ' lover ' till she gives in to his egocentric love. And this has been the narrative since the sixties. The woman is surrounded by her cohorts, mostly bad looking, and our hero finally chooses the best looking, titilating her into his erogeneous zone. Once the Film Censors Board made a stricture on ''kissing'' in films, and sought to ban it as vulgarity. The irony was that many more suggestible scenes of sexual affront were not censored, but kissing was made out to be a vulgar extravaganza! This was not only strange, it made a travesty of doing away with obscenity in films. Kissing as an honest statement of a relationship, was seen as a perversity, but the male dominated world playing around with the curvaceous body of his bikini clad heroine, with tremulous fingers was not seen as something coarse or vulgar. In the process many suggestive scenes aroused the curiosity of a suppressed thinking of 'conservative' societies.

This has led to a totally amoral view of sex, and the Indian male point of view happens to be gratification and sexist in this context, polemical as this might sound. Similarly the idiot box, living up to its name has been churning out serials and reality shows, of the most vulgar kind, where things such as extra marital sex are shown with alacrity. This can have the most unsalutary effect especially on young minds, leading to the downfall of the culture of reading good books.

There is nothing to feel flustered by what the Director has said, he has made an honest statement, and subconsciously may even be pleading guilty! We need to anatomize culture effect of such films, where male tastes are prurient and used to subjugate the women they desire.

The box is not idiot, it is we who have converted it into idiocy, leading to a denigration of values and palpable crimes such as rape.
 
Share This:
21-Jan-2013
More by :  Ananya S Guha
 
Views: 758      Comments: 0




Name *
Email ID
 (will not be published)
Comment *
Characters
Verification Code*
Can't read? Reload
Please fill the above code for verification.
 
Top | Society



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2018 All Rights Reserved
 
No part of this Internet site may be reproduced without prior written permission of the copyright holder
.