Modi and Manmohan Singh by Rajinder Puri SignUp

In Focus

Photo Essays


Random Thoughts

Our Heritage


Society & Lifestyle


Creative Writings

Book Reviews
Literary Shelf
Analysis Share This Page
Modi and Manmohan Singh
by Dr. Rajinder Puri Bookmark and Share

Corporate vested interests undeniably exert disproportionate influence on mainline media. As the primary and perhaps only window for information media is the most powerful instrument for shaping public opinion. Not surprisingly therefore most readers echo editorial views by rubbishing the unborn Federal Front. They limit the choice only between the Congress and BJP.

It is amusing how the lack of cohesion between regional leaders is cited to ridicule the proposed Federal Front. But are differences between Miss Jayalalithaa and Mr. Naveen Patnaik more or less acute than those between Mr. Advani and Mr. Narendra Modi or between Mr. Chidambaram and Mr. Digvijay Singh? Nevertheless the distortions continue. Most vulnerable to media propaganda is the young generation.

This essay is addressed mostly to young people with full knowledge that they might consider the views expressed in these columns outrageous.

Young people fed on Twitter and Facebook repose great hopes on Mr. Narendra Modi to introduce change. I had earlier described Mr. Modi as a muscular version of Mr. Manmohan Singh. Nothing has happened as yet for me to change that view.

Consider both the similarities and differences between the approaches of both leaders. Both are committed to accelerate economic growth by inviting foreign direct investment much to the satisfaction of big business. Modi is more successful than Mr. Manmohan Singh because he does not have any National Advisory Chairperson to impede growth and initiate harebrained schemes for distributing subsidies and doles that involve wastage of national resources without augmenting revenue. Also, Mr. Modi’s record in curbing corruption is much better. But this signifies no real change of direction. Mr. Modi offers only prospect of improvement through efficient management without real change of direction.

Both leaders rely on vote banks. Mr. Manmohan Singh woos Muslims while Mr. Modi panders to Hindus. But with the advent of elections Mr. Modi is making visible efforts to reach out to Muslims too. Neither leader has lifted a little finger to promote a modern, casteless Indian identity which I believe young people really deserve. Both leaders apparently are happy with the prevalent, divisive caste based reservation policy which arguably violates the spirit of the Indian Constitution. Indeed, Mr. Modi is even being projected by sections of his party as the new champion of the backward castes because he belongs to one.

Both leaders are unconcerned with ushering systemic reform through strict adherence to the written injunctions of the Constitution. Both are unconcerned with the yawning gap between Constitutional precept and systemic practice which makes mockery of our democracy. Neither leader has introduced much needed labor reform which could increase productivity. Neither leader has introduced a basic shift in the pattern of state investment to promote employment and rural infrastructure that would change the lives of millions. Neither leader has taken any step to introduce free compulsory primary education that would empower the poor and unleash enormous human talent.

Not only with regard to economic development but also in foreign policy the similarities between both leaders are striking. Both leaders continue to woo China without a thought for obtaining a quid pro quo. Neither leader is prepared to exercise India’s economic leverage against Beijing that would hurt China most. Both seek increased Chinese investment and promote an adverse balance of trade that hurts India’s manufacturing sector of industry.

Currently Defence Minister Mr. AK Antony is scheduled to visit Beijing the same time as Pakistan Prime Minister Mr. Nawaz Sharif. He is expected to raise the issue of Pakistan Occupied Kashmir (POK) with Beijing. Why is the government literally inviting China to act as the big brother for resolving Indo-Pakistan issues instead of addressing issues bilaterally with Islamabad? All that New Delhi needs to tell China is to get out of POK which belongs to India and by entering which Beijing violated the UN ceasefire agreement between India and Pakistan. One doubts if any of these issues would disturb Mr. Modi who is busy wooing Beijing for increased investment, has housed the headquarters of a controversial Chinese telecom giant designated as a security risk in Gujarat, and has visited China four times as an honored guest receiving lavish hospitality. The Chinese Ambassador in India did not hesitate to publicly single out Mr. Modi as a special Beijing favorite.

Neither Mr. Manmohan Singh nor Mr. Modi has suggested a single practical step to persuade Pakistan to enter into an integrated relationship with India. Neither leader has suggested any strategy to integrate India with its immediate neighbors to give expression to the region’s cultural nationalism. Mr. Manmohan Singh draws his inspiration from the memory of Jawaharlal Nehru. Mr. Modi draws inspiration from the memory of Sardar Vallabhai Patel. Needless to say both Nehru and Patel worked very closely to partition our nation.

What then are the differences between Mr. Manmohan Singh and Mr. Modi?

The differences are many but they are merely cosmetic. Mr. Manmohan Singh is almost inarticulate while Mr. Modi is an orator. There is great difference in style, but is there difference in substance? Mr. Modi offers hope of improved functioning of Mr. Manmohan Singh’s model of development. That would be a gain. It may satisfy most Indians. But it will not be the game changer that can make India a role model for the new world order for which this writer believes India has the potential. For India to realize its potential the nation needs beyond reform a peaceful democratic revolution. Perhaps the hope of achieving this is utopian. Perhaps most Indians are right to pragmatically seek improved governance and little more. In that case young Indians are welcome to pursue the fortunes of the BJP or Congress. They would be in the good company of big multinational corporations. For the corporate world Mr. Manmohan Singh and Mr. Modi are two sides of the same coin. So toss the coin for the polls and see how it falls. It will not matter whether it is heads of tails. After the toss the coin can be safely pocketed.

Share This:
More by :  Dr. Rajinder Puri
Top | Analysis
Views: 1740      Comments: 3

Comments on this Article

Comment As this article was aimed at youngsters of this country, it was addressed to me and I am speaking for myself and not for the youngsters in general...
Firstly, I would like to say, its not just Modi or Manmohan...all politicians are the same, they have made politics a dirty game and governance a joke...
But for one, I see Modi, seems to have delivered in Gujarat that we expected out of our Central Govt which it failed...
Right now, we require better implementation and stricter following of the rules and laws and policies, lesser corruption, more accountability to make things efficient. So even if Modi offers only prospect of improvement through efficient management without real change of direction, I would rather take notice of that than wait for our PM to speak which I am pretty sure even if he does will be the least informative...
Though I don't know much about the education development in Gujarat that Modi has brought about I can't really take your view point on it.
But what has really caught my eye is the issue of Chinese entering POK...and on that I support you...I had very little knowledge of this happening and I totally agree with what you have to say. China, USA or any other country for that matter has no right to get involved in matters concerning Kashmir, Leh Ladhak, Arunachal Pradesh and any of our borders unless we are specifically dealing with them, for eg: China in case of North East states and extreme North like Ladhak...
But yet again I disagree with you when you say that Sardar Patel along with Nehru were the main cause of partition...If you are talking about India Pakistan partition, we have Nehru-Gandhi-Jinah to be blamed for...Each with their own motives...And apart from that if anything, it is because of Patel Hyderabad and Junagadh are a part of our country and if not for Nehru, Kashmir too without doubt would have been a part of India! So I would like to disagree with you on that...
And finally, I must be content with what our politics can provide me with right now, just a shade better and accountable leader who has in him the capability to at least correct the wrongs, undo the done things (wrong), and do the things that haven't been done, or were expected to be done from a major leader and politician like our PM himself and his party. So even if Modi, can do all that I have said above and try to get us back on track, which UPA has got us off, successfully...It would really do some good to the country...

And as for India reaching the potential she is capable of, it won't be possible till the time, each and every citizen politicians ( both Manmohan Singh and Narendra Modi)and civil alike, take in their hands their duties, their responsibilities seriously and use their rights diligently keeping aside their own political motives and egos...

07/20/2013 09:07 AM

Comment The essay is too simplistic.

D C Joshi
07/11/2013 13:33 PM

Comment It is beginning to look like we need to invest in the media. It would get great reviews.

Michael Cain
07/09/2013 20:13 PM

Name *
Email ID
 (will not be published)
Comment *
Verification Code*
Can't read? Reload
Please fill the above code for verification.
1999-2022 All Rights Reserved
No part of this Internet site may be reproduced without prior written permission of the copyright holder