Depressing & Confusing: Aligarh by G Swaminathan SignUp
Boloji.com

Channels

In Focus

 
Analysis
Cartoons
Education
Environment
Opinion
Photo Essays
 
 

Columns

 
A Bystander's Diary
Business
Random Thoughts
 
 

Our Heritage

 
Architecture
Astrology
Ayurveda
Buddhism
Cinema
Culture
Festivals
Hinduism
History
People
Places
Sikhism
Spirituality
 
 

Society & Lifestyle

 
Health
Parenting
Perspective
Recipes
Society
Teens
Women
 
 

Creative Writings

 
Book Reviews
Computing
Ghalib's Corner
Humor
Individuality
Literary Shelf
Love Letters
Memoirs
Quotes
Stories
Travelogues
Workshop
 
 
Cinema Share This Page
Depressing & Confusing: Aligarh
by G Swaminathan Bookmark and Share

I just couldn’t make out what director Hansal Mehta tried to convey through his recent, critically acclaimed movie ‘Aligarh’. The story is based on the real life of a homosexual professor Dr. Shrinivas Ramachandra Siras who had been sacked from his post in the Aligarh University for his sexual orientation. Later, he was reinstated because of the Delhi High Court judgement on decriminalization of homosexuality only to see him commit suicide on the second day of his winning the case and joining.

In my view, the story or his real life incident was rather confusing. Siras, in a way, is shown as a bemused man rather than a scholar. When asked whether he is ‘gay’ he replies in the negative. Then what made him to indulge in physical relationship with his partner who is a young rickshaw guy? He says it cannot be explained just like that. The answer may be poetic but can it be accepted in the court of law?

Well, Siras is a poet, loner, married but the wife had walked out on him; here too when asked by his media friend Dipu is it because of his sexual orientation, he says no. The entire episode of his sexual escapade seems to be preplanned and videographed and publicizied to intimidate him by a group of colleagues due to inner politics.

Homosexuality had never been shown in the proper light in any Hindi film so far. This movie is no better. Siras is grouchy though good basically. His suicide too explains nothing. Is he a coward or he has been murdered again by the enemies inside the university?

Though the movie moves in a committed manner with a sort of serious narration, the ultimate result conveys nothing but the fact that in India a man who came out closet will only face ignominy and will become untouchable. One cannot understand Hansal Mehta had taken this decision or his protégé Raj Kummar Rao insisted on showing him as a ‘straight’and ‘normal’guy by adding an unnecessary liplock and love making scene with his woman boss.

In such circumstances, one cannot but appreciate Manoj Bajpai for having the gumption to do the role Siras. He, was a lonely man at the evening of his life who had been punished for his sexuality and who took it seriously at times and jovial in some moments. Funny, but is possible. Manoj Bajpai lives up to the character of the man with eccentricity.

The movie on the whole is far from entertaining or educative. It just unfolds and states the homophobia existing in this country. The handful of audience stands proof for that. The film can never become popular except in some international film circles.

Share This:
05-Mar-2016
More by :  G Swaminathan
 
Views: 446      Comments: 0




Name *
Email ID
 (will not be published)
Comment
Characters
Verification Code*
Can't read? Reload
Please fill the above code for verification.
 
Top | Cinema



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2018 All Rights Reserved
 
No part of this Internet site may be reproduced without prior written permission of the copyright holder
.