Stephen Hawking – Inspiring Theoretical Physicist by Gollamudi Radha Krishna Murty SignUp
Boloji.com

Channels

In Focus

 
Analysis
Cartoons
Education
Environment
Opinion
Photo Essays
 
 

Columns

 
A Bystander's Diary
Business
Random Thoughts
 
 

Our Heritage

 
Architecture
Astrology
Ayurveda
Buddhism
Cinema
Culture
Festivals
Hinduism
History
People
Places
Sikhism
Spirituality
 
 

Society & Lifestyle

 
Health
Parenting
Perspective
Recipes
Society
Teens
Women
 
 

Creative Writings

 
Book Reviews
Computing
Ghalib's Corner
Humor
Individuality
Literary Shelf
Love Letters
Memoirs
Quotes
Stories
Travelogues
Workshop
 
 
People Share This Page
Stephen Hawking – Inspiring Theoretical Physicist
by Gollamudi Radha Krishna Murty Bookmark and Share

In today’s world where people get upset over even little problems, Stephen Hawking, who died on March 14 aged 76, had shown how one could not only manage to stay alive with even a deadly motor neuron disease but also break scientific boundaries.

Stephen William Hawking, a brilliant scientist and the best-known physicist since Albert Einstein, was born in Oxford, UK on January 8, 1942—exactly on the 300th death anniversary of Galileo Galilei, the Italian natural philosopher, astronomer and mathematician, with whom he shared something in common: Hawking, like Galileo, who was admonished by ecclesiastical politicians “not to hold, teach, or defend” the Copernican theory “in any way whatever, either orally or in writing”, too had to fight to be heard. Of course, Hawking’s struggle was not because of the clergy but due to a degenerative motor neuron disease called amyotrophic lateral sclerosis that he was diagnosed with at the age of 21. It slowly ate away his muscles, confining him to wheelchair. His condition turned worse in 1985 when he caught pneumonia and had a tracheotomy, for he lost whatever little control he had till then on his speech once for all, besides becoming a dependent on 24-hour care. Since then, he had been communicating through the electronic voice synthesizer.

Though his body slumped, his spirit soared high, for his mental faculties remained untouched by the disease. With that of a child’s curiosity, he pursued his ambitious intellectual goal, “Complete understanding of the universe, why it is as it is and why it exists at all”, by entering Cambridge in 1962 as a PhD student working on ‘Properties of Expanding Universe’ under the supervision of cosmologist, Denis Sciama and rose to become the Lucasian Professor of Mathematics in 1979. After retiring in 2009, he worked as the Dennis Stanton Avery and Sally Tsui Wong-Avery Director of Research in the Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics until his death.

It is in 1970 that his exceptional intelligence first came into limelight with the now famous ‘singularity theorem’ that he proposed jointly with the mathematician Roger Penrose, which showed that general relativity implies that singularity lay at the starting point of our universe, the Big Bang.

This interest in singularities naturally led Hawking to work on black holes. His initial work on black holes suggested that a black hole can only increase, never decrease in size—which sounds obvious, for nothing that gets close to a black hole can escape from being swallowed by it and thus gains mass. He had also shown that a black hole can never be split into smaller ones—even, say through collision of two black holes. He also argued that the event horizon’s ever-expanding surface area was analogous to another quantity known as entropy which could only grow. And these two—increasing surface area of a black hole and increasing entropy of the universe were oddly similar.

As Hawking announced his result in 1970, a young physicist called, Jacob Bekenstein boldly questioning: “what if this wasn’t just an analogy?” suggested that the surface area of a black hole’s event horizon might be a measure of the black hole’s entropy. This however was turned down by Hawking and many other physicists, for black holes and entropy didn’t seem to go together.

But as he set out to prove Bekenstein was wrong, he realised that Bekenstein is “basically correct” and to prove it he brought together general relativity and quantum theory, a feat which nobody else managed. And thus came in 1974, his brilliant thesis published in the Journal, Nature under the title, “Black Hole Explosions?” wherein using quantum theory, he predicted that black holes—the regions of space-time having a gravitational field so immense that nothing can escape it—emit “thermal radiation” and hence “one would expect it to lose mass” which phenomenon “in turn would increase the surface gravity and so increase the rate of emission” because of which black hole would “have finite life”—i.e., the larger the size of the black hole, the longer it takes to evaporate, while miniature black holes vanish much faster.

This shocking and controversial publication had also kick-started a long-lasting debate: when black holes evaporate, what would happen to the information trapped in them? There could be two possibilities: either it is somehow encoded in the radiation emitted by the black hole, or it is vanished. Surprisingly, Hawking claimed that the information—mass, position, charge, etc.—disappears for ever, hearing which the American Physicist, Leonard Susskind argued that Hawking was simply wrong. For, Hawking’s assumption violates the basic principle of quantum mechanics: the conservation of information. And this debate raged, of course, fairly in a collegial manner, for decades, including the fun-loving Hawking wagering an Encyclopaedia that information was indeed lost in back holes. However, in 2004 Hawking finally concedes that he lost the bet, for Susskind is right but with a qualification: information was only returned to the universe in a corrupt form that was virtually impossible to read and to this effect he did publish a paper next year. But it failed to convince many Physicists.

In the 1980s, Hawking came up with another brilliant idea of explaining the Big Bang in quantum mechanical terms. He believed that the quantum fluctuations in an inflationary universe spread galaxies in the universe. Working with James Hartle, he argued that when the universe was extremely tiny, quantum theory implies that the distinction between space and time was extremely fuzzy. It means that early universe did not have meaningful boundaries in time or space. However, some physicists believe that his quantum equation, supposed to explain the universe in its early stage does not say anything meaningful. And, this idea is still being debated.

Incidentally, it is this model that he explained in his bestselling book, A Brief History of Time (1988) that instantly made him a celebrity even among the masses. Although he authored/edited by then quite a few influential books, of course jointly with others—The Large scale Structure of Spacetime (1973), General Relativity: an Einstein Centenary Survey (1979), Superspace and Supergravity (1981), The very Early Universe (1983)—it is this book— A Brief History of Time— that brought him closer to even common man besides the book being on the Sunday Times best-seller list for a record-breaking 237 weeks. It was also translated into as many 40 world languages.

Moving on, this iconic cosmologist of his time had this to advise to the fellow scientists who assembled at Cambridge to celebrate his 75th birthday in 2017: “…Be curious, and however difficult life may seem, there is always something you can do, and succeed at. It matters that you don’t just give up.” And the life of this wheelchair-huddled man which is an amazing manifestation of willpower and determination, is in itself a testimony to what Prof Stephen Hawking said.

Share This:
08-Apr-2018
More by :  Gollamudi Radha Krishna Murty
 
Views: 229      Comments: 0




Name *
Email ID
 (will not be published)
Comment *
Characters
Verification Code*
Can't read? Reload
Please fill the above code for verification.
 
Top | People



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2018 All Rights Reserved
 
No part of this Internet site may be reproduced without prior written permission of the copyright holder
.