VG Siddhartha's Sad Demise by Gollamudi Radha Krishna Murty SignUp
Boloji.com

Channels

In Focus

 
Analysis
Cartoons
Education
Environment
Opinion
Photo Essays
 
 

Columns

 
Business
Random Thoughts
 
 

Our Heritage

 
Architecture
Astrology
Ayurveda
Buddhism
Cinema
Culture
Festivals
Hinduism
History
People
Places
Sikhism
Spirituality
 
 

Society & Lifestyle

 
Health
Parenting
Perspective
Recipes
Society
Teens
Women
 
 

Creative Writings

 
Book Reviews
Computing
Humor
Individuality
Literary Shelf
Memoirs
Quotes
Stories
Travelogues
Workshop
 
 
Analysis Share This Page
VG Siddhartha's Sad Demise
by Gollamudi Radha Krishna Murty Bookmark and Share

The business world today is different. It’s full of challenges. It’s ambiguous. It’s complex. It’s quite unpredictable. Its players are after speed, and have thus become highly vulnerable to distress and burnout. Such were the thoughts that swarmed the mind hearing the tragic demise of the Café Coffee Day (CCD) founder VG Siddhartha (VGS).

Siddhartha, a bright and young entrepreneur, established a novel chain of affordable hangouts for the Indian youths of 21 st century under the brand name CCD. Created employment for the rural youth by training them to be fit enough to work in a service industry where greeting an irate visitor with a smile makes all the difference. Built a Desi brand of his own, selling a finely brewed coffee, which caught the attention of the urban middle-class. Everything looked hunky-dory, till his work-life balance tilted to the fatal extreme!

The business world is shaken by the apparent suicide of VGS — “a quiet and unassuming pioneer who started the coffee cafes chain ahead of Starbucks entry in India”. A letter said to have been written by him to the firm’s board and employees stating that he “gave up”, blaming tax authorities for “harassment” and decisions that created a liquidity crunch and also about the pressure exerted by a person from a private equity firm to buy back their stake has indeed inflamed the business world’s anger towards the government and its tax rides that are often alleged to be tainted by a political element.

This letter raises two vital issues. First one: the interface between the government and the taxpayer. There is, perhaps, an urgent need for refinement in the current approach. Our ancient thinkers strongly advocated a kind of taxation whose implementation is not felt by the people. A King is ordained to take into account the ‘Yoga Kshema’ of the taxpayers while levying taxes. It is said that while collecting taxes, a king must act like a ‘gardener’, and not like a ‘charcoal maker’. Let us hope that our tax-system will practice this sane advice.

The second issue that VG’s letter raises is: the dysfunctional corporate debt market in the country. It subtly points out that VG, who had successfully built the CCD brand, would have had no difficulty in raising money and running the business alright in a functional debt market duly backed by an efficient legal framework. As against this, today our banking system being overburdened by distressed assets has become risk-averse. Even NBFCs that are passing through liquidity crunch after the IL&FS crisis are of no avail. Thus, credit to businesses has evaporated. On the demand side, businesses, with investments drying up and employment becoming scarce, are facing a knock-out effect on their revenues. Simply put, economy itself is in a serious trouble. Cumulatively, all this made jittery investors put more pressure on businesses that are already in trouble to pay back their investments. But the pity is, all over the western capital markets, PE investors are known for providing risk-capital for startups but it seems to be different in India. Now the question is: Whom to blame? And, what to blame for?

The only answer for this toxic conundrum is perhaps what Anand Mahindra, Mahindra Group Chairman tweeted: “Entrepreneurs must not allow business failure to destroy their self-esteem as it will be the end of entrepreneurship.” What a profound statement!

That said, let us first try to understand what entrepreneurship means. Simply put, it is an activity of setting up a business taking on unusual financial risks in the hope of profit. There are three important words in this, viz., ‘risk’, ‘hope’ and ‘profit’ and they command our further indulgence. First, the all-important one: Risk. It means “to dare”. It means it is more a ‘choice’ than a ‘fate’. In other words, it is a chosen one by the entrepreneur. In statistical terms, it is the degree of variability of possible outcome of a particular event. In financial parlance, risk is always associated with loss that is expected to be incurred due to the happening or non-happening of a certain event or events. It thus becomes an uncertainty with a known probability. And importantly, remember, it is chosen by the entrepreneur. But then the question is: Why? Because, he has a ‘hope’ — hope of handling it. Hope of manipulating it, morphing it, managing it in his favour.

Thus comes the next important word for the entrepreneur: ‘Hope’. It is the vital spark of life, the sole driving force behind mankind’s dreaming, planning, execution and his very existence. “Everything that is done in the world is done by hope”, said Martin Luther King. But unfortunately, hope too is exhaustible. And that is where an entrepreneur needs to regain hope by “hoping for the moment”. Else, there is a danger of one getting dumped in needless gloom. So, what an entrepreneur needs to cultivate is self-esteem. And he should do it all the time.

That’s where the word ‘grit’ steps in. It is observed that most of the successful entrepreneurs are found to possess enormous ‘grit’. Grit is made up of persistence, passion, and resilience. It is the passion for the chosen enterprise that enables an entrepreneur to stomach all the rejection and still do something better than what has already been done for sustaining the enterprise. The gritty lot will never give up until they achieve their goals. Even if they are knocked down, they bounce back and try in a different way to keep going.

After all, an entrepreneur’s journey is always through an uncharted territory. So, nothing is obvious for him; every move is a new step which he himself has to draft. For, there are no ‘a prioris’. He has to strike out on his own. In short, it is the perseverance that yields the much-desired profit. And it is the profit that sustains the enterprise. Challenges do arise, but they should not overwhelm the entrepreneur, instead he/she should innovate newer ways to overcome them.

That is entrepreneurship! And as Anand Mahindra’s tweet says, no entrepreneur should allow his/her business’s systemic risk kill their entrepreneurial spirit.

 

Share This:
03-Aug-2019
More by :  Gollamudi Radha Krishna Murty
 
Views: 199      Comments: 2

Comments on this Article

Comment Thank you, Dr NC Mishra. As you have observed, no two individuals are alike. With regard to repayment of debts by an entrepreneur, one must bear in mind what Dubet (1994) stated: “the entrepreneur mobilizes various logics of action: (a) a socialization logic , (b) a logic of economic rationality, and (c) a logic of personal ethics. So, what is essentially needed for an entrepreneur besides the rationality of maximizing opportunity-seizing is the existence of genuine business ethics.


murty
08/08/2019 11:07 AM

Comment Two things come to mind. One- human beings are made differently.Some would cry if they trample even an ant while others would commit a murder and go about laughing.
Second, any businessman is bound to repay his debts.Often, promoters siphon off public funds (often in connivance with other accomplices) and cry hoarse, blaming external factors. They pretend to be virtuous and ask for further support (read cash).

N C Mishra
08/04/2019 00:56 AM




Name *
Email ID
 (will not be published)
Comment *
Characters
Verification Code*
Can't read? Reload
Please fill the above code for verification.
 
Top | Analysis



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1999-2019 All Rights Reserved
 
No part of this Internet site may be reproduced without prior written permission of the copyright holder
.