The Submissive Trait Nature or Nurture-Insoluble Problem by Gaurang Bhatt, MD SignUp
Boloji.com

Channels

In Focus

 
Analysis
Cartoons
Education
Environment
Opinion
Photo Essays
 
 

Columns

 
A Bystander's Diary
Business
Random Thoughts
 
 

Our Heritage

 
Architecture
Astrology
Ayurveda
Buddhism
Cinema
Culture
Festivals
Hinduism
History
People
Places
Sikhism
Spirituality
 
 

Society & Lifestyle

 
Health
Parenting
Perspective
Recipes
Society
Teens
Women
 
 

Creative Writings

 
Book Reviews
Computing
Ghalib's Corner
Humor
Individuality
Literary Shelf
Love Letters
Memoirs
Quotes
Stories
Travelogues
Workshop
 
 
Random Thoughts Share This Page
The Submissive Trait Nature or Nurture-Insoluble Problem
by Gaurang Bhatt, MD Bookmark and Share
In the eighteenth century before the full development of the industrial revolution, China and India accounted for twenty-five percent each, of the GNP of the world. The standard excuse is that the large mass of humanity was probably responsible for this dominant state. It is probably true, but raises an important question, why the industrial revolution did not occur in those countries. China even more than India's earlier progress in developing the decimal system had a lead in some technologies like printing, metallurgy and fireworks. A Pulitzer Prize winning book- Guns, Germs and Steel, as much for content, as for being politically correct ascribes the lack of development in Africa to geography and lack of animals docile enough for domestication and navigable rivers. This feel good thesis wins applause, while whitewashing the truth and thus meets applause from the new left and pseudo-egalitarian apologists. It obfuscates facts and hides the truth to brainwash the oppressed from their fundamental weakness of not having understood the reality, that every civilization must not only be fair to its own followers, but must also set up mechanisms to protect itself from alien thinkers with a differing or colonizing agenda.

India has the unique burden of shame, in that its native inhabitants for pecuniary reasons, without any clear sense of identity or nationalism, partly through the differing linguistic groups, allowed a colonizing power to recruit native soldiers to perpetuate oppression and conquest by a foreign colonizing power, which used the locals to conquer, colonize and oppress its fellow citizens, even though in some cases those subjugated were neither ethnically, linguistically or culturally different from the ignorant mercenaries, who helped to perpetuate this dastardly colonization. This abominable shameful betrayal has even led to a current colloquialism in modern parlance about the use of Gurkha troops. Incidentally, recently the Gurkhas filed a lawsuit against the British government for discrimination because of paying lesser salaries and benefits to such troops. At least China does not have the same legacy of shame as the Boxer rebellion demonstrates. Nevertheless there is a long and shameful policy of indifference at best, to collaboration at worst on the part of China, India and much of Africa for their colonization and slavery. This stands in stark contrast to France seeking its independence from the English Henry after subjugation by marriage or of the Netherlands throwing off the yoke of the Spanish rule from a distant suzerainty separated geographically by alien territory.

Do the Africans, Chinese and Indians and I will throw in the Middle Eastern Moslems, have a submissive trait genetically based or is this a question of nurture and social taming, because of their culture and religion? Confucianism glorifies subjugation to authority, whether royal or paternal, Hinduism devalues current life, while emphasizing duty and the hereafter and Islam is the tyranny of submission ideas by an illiterate manipulator, with a claim of being a prophet, so it is not inconceivable that the constraints of history or genetic bottlenecks could be the basis of the proclivity for enslavement for much of Africa and Asia.

Fortunately the Jews may be the partial rescue for this conundrum. They have a long history of conquest, subjugation and exploitation. Yet for the first time in recorded history they have stood up against the world to find a dominant position, partly with the support of America. If one concedes this point then it should clearly establish that the submissive trait is not genetic, because for the first time in history the Jews have become chordates, meaning those with backbones. On the other hand the creation of Israel and its subsequent hard line attitudes can only be initially ascribed to the Ashkenazis, even though the more recent militancy is equally due to the Sephardim. Thus is this new confrontational attitude due to nurture because of the historical Holocaust, or the effect of environment, because of their long exile in Europe?  
Share This:
03-Aug-2003
More by :  Gaurang Bhatt, MD
 
Views: 1442      Comments: 0




Name *
Email ID
 (will not be published)
Comment *
Characters
Verification Code*
Can't read? Reload
Please fill the above code for verification.
 
Top | Random Thoughts



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2018 All Rights Reserved
 
No part of this Internet site may be reproduced without prior written permission of the copyright holder
.