Less is More - The Minimalist Approach to Life |
|||||||
Prof. Shubha Tiwari |
![]() |
||||||
I remember Gandhi having written at one place or the other that his associates told him how much it took to keep him in poverty. Sometimes I just feel like declaring that the minimalist approach to life is a farce. If anyone says that Steve Jobs was a minimalist, I feel people have not understood things. Jobs created designs which were immensely simple and yet immensely costly. Simple is costly these days. Pure air, pure water, healthy habitat, natural fabrics, pure food - it’s all elite, completely luxurious. Minimizing needs and living a simple life is the ultimate luxury. The two ideas don’t match. You should have your own farm in order to have chemical free grains; then you must have your own cattle to have chemical free milk. Then what about spices and vegetables? Can a poor person afford pure food? No. How can less be more? I mean I can go on and on at the philosophical level propounding great theories of minimizing our needs but is it really possible, especially in today’s world? Travel is a must; meeting people is a must; dressing decently is a must; good books are a big must; wi-fi is a must; cars are a must. Mineral water is a must. Proper medical care is a must. Education is a must. What is not required? And everything comes at a cost. Honestly, can we do without a TV or a fridge? We just can’t. Then why go on lecturing on ‘use less; save planet’. We need larger solutions for saving the planet. Just see our god men. They are supposed to be the masters of controlling material needs. Just how minimum their needs are - pure ghee, dry fruits, silks, the best cosmetics, pure milk, and of course air travel, fleet of Rolls Royce and it goes on! If you see from their point of view, you’ll see that the very basic requirements of their profession are so costly. It takes a lot to create that holy, natural, pure, ‘minimum’ atmosphere. People call Giorgio Armani, a minimalist. Well, you can call him a minimalist in terms of designs. He eliminated the unnecessary in women’s clothing; the unnecessary frills and layers. But then Armani is one of the costliest brands. Here too simplicity comes at a high cost. Yes, I can give Toyo Ito, the Japanese architect the title of a successful minimalist because he changed the meaning of architecture. Changing building materials can be a revolutionizing minimalist approach. We should relook at the idea of an abode in the present century. Overall this minimalist theory looks more bookish than practical. ‘Consumerism is violence against nature’ - this can be a good slogan but in reality it is very difficult to follow. If we really want to save environment, we need larger solutions like practically possible electric automobiles, cheap and easily available solar energy and things like that. Otherwise, all minimalist talk will just remain talk. |
|||||||
Share This: | |||||||
|
|||||||
Views: 2879 Comments: 2 | |||||||
Comments on this Blog
Kapil Bamba 04/09/2013 04:07 AM
Shailbala Misra 04/09/2013 01:04 AM |
|||||||
|
|