... Unanswered Questions and the Need for Accountability

How well do we know the origins of the Indian Constitution? Have we allowed myths and selective narratives to overshadow facts? Why does a document that embodies democracy and equality raise so many questions about its creation, its authors, and its inclusions?

As India commemorates 75 years of adopting its Constitution, it is imperative to revisit its origins — not with reverence clouded by dogma but with clarity sharpened by inquiry. The Constitution, hailed as the cornerstone of India's democracy, is often solely associated with Dr. B.R. Ambedkar. While his contributions are undeniable, the narrative obscures the work of others, like Benegal Narsing Rau, and raises critical questions about omissions, inclusions, and intentions.

The Unacknowledged Architect: Benegal Narsing Rau

The drafting of the Constitution began long before Ambedkar chaired the Drafting Committee in 1947. Benegal Narsing Rau, an eminent jurist, created the foundational draft of the Constitution between 1946 and 1948, drawing inspiration from global frameworks, including those of Germany and the United States. His meticulous work laid the groundwork for the Drafting Committee.

Why, then, is Rau’s role relegated to the shadows of history? Was his exclusion from recognition a mere oversight, or does it hint at a larger conspiracy? Why did Ambedkar, often credited as the sole author of the Constitution, not emphasize the contributions of over 20 committees and their chairpersons?

A Collective Effort Overshadowed

The Constitution is often glorified as Ambedkar’s magnum opus, but was it realistically the work of one individual? With over 20 committees and experts contributing to various aspects of the document, why are these contributors not celebrated? Does the crediting of the entire document to Ambedkar reveal a deliberate sidelining of others, or is it a byproduct of political and social agendas?

The Role of Religious & Historical Imagery

A secular Constitution adorned with religious imagery raises significant questions. Why did Ambedkar, a self-proclaimed secularist, allow depictions of Hindu deities like Ram, Krishna, and Arjuna, as well as Buddha, Mahavira, and even historical rulers like Akbar and Tipu Sultan? Was it an effort to appease diverse sections of society, or was it a reflection of deeper ideological motives?

Historical accounts reveal that Ashoka, while celebrated as a proponent of Buddhism, was also a warmonger responsible for the Kalinga war and subsequent massacres. Similarly, Akbar and Tipu Sultan’s inclusion as foreign rulers of India raises questions about their relevance in a document of national independence. Were these choices pragmatic or propagandist?

Ambedkar’s Own Reservations About the Constitution

Ambedkar’s later criticism of the Constitution adds another layer of complexity. His remarks, including his willingness to “burn” it, indicate dissatisfaction. Was this a critique of its implementation or acknowledgment of inherent flaws? If Ambedkar himself questioned the document, should his role as its sole architect remain unchallenged?

The Public Rejection of Ambedkar

Despite being a prominent figure in the making of the Constitution, Ambedkar faced repeated electoral defeats and failed to gain mass public support during his lifetime. Why did his vision fail to resonate with the masses he sought to uplift? His caste-based political party, the All India Scheduled Castes Federation, failed to garner significant support even among the Scheduled Castes. Does this rejection undermine the narrative of Ambedkar as a universally accepted leader?

The Rise of Ambedkarism in Contemporary India

In recent decades, Ambedkar’s legacy has been amplified, with his ideology often wielded as a political tool. Is this resurgence a genuine recognition of his contributions or a strategy to polarize society under the guise of social justice? Does the sidelining of figures like Rau and the glorification of Ambedkar point to a caste-based conspiracy that contradicts the very principles of equality and meritocracy the Constitution upholds?

Final Thoughts: Seeking Accountability

Have we done justice to the true history of the Indian Constitution? Are we perpetuating half-truths and myths in the name of political correctness? Shouldn't every contributor, from Benegal Narsing Rau to the 20 committee chairpersons, be acknowledged?

The Constitution is not merely a document; it is a living entity that shapes governance and society. As we celebrate its legacy, it is imperative to address these questions with honesty. Can we afford to ignore these complexities in our quest for national progress? Will we rise above distortions to honor the collective vision that birthed this democratic framework? The answers lie not in reverence but in relentless inquiry.

Image (c) istock.com