Why Every Religion Expanded — Except Sanatana Dharma

• Why did ships sail out of Arabia and Europe carrying scripture and sword, but no armadas left Bharata to convert the world?
• Why do Christianity and Islam today span continents, while Hinduism is still overwhelmingly clustered around the Ganga plain?
• Why did some faiths build ‘global empires’ of believers, while Sanatana Dharma built ‘inner empires’ of consciousness?
• And in a noisy world obsessed with numbers, does a tradition that never chased headcount automatically count as “weak”?

Or is there a deeper, uncomfortable truth we have refused to look in the eye?

Let’s walk through history, myth, and modern data to understand why almost every major religion expanded aggressively — except Sanatana Dharma.

1. The Age of Expansion: When Faith Rode on Empires

Look at today’s world map.

Roughly 2.3 billion people identify as Christians, almost 29 percent of humanity.

About 2 billion identify as Muslims, nearly a quarter of the planet and the fastest-growing major faith.

Hindus? Around 1.2 billion people — about 15 percent of the world — and that share has stayed almost flat for decades.

Hinduism is the third-largest religion, but unlike the others, it is still geographically concentrated: mainly India, Nepal, and a diaspora scattered by trade, indentured labor, and migration — not by organized conversion.

Why this stark difference?

Because other faiths tied themselves early to state power and missionary machinery.

• Christianity moved from being a persecuted sect in the Roman Empire to the Empire’s official creed. Once emperors converted, armies, traders, and later colonizers carried the cross from Europe to the Americas, Africa, and Asia. Missionary orders followed conquest, building schools, hospitals, and churches — a full-stack model of spiritual and social expansion.
   
• Islam spread through a combination of trade networks and political expansion. The early Caliphates, Ottoman Empire, and later sultanates linked faith with governance. From Spain to Indonesia, conversion often followed conquest, taxation policies, or elite patronage. Today, there are more than 50 Muslim-majority countries. 

These faiths framed history as one life, one judgement, one true path — a high-stakes story in which saving souls was a moral emergency. Expansion was not just political strategy; it was presented as divine duty.

Now place Sanatana Dharma beside this.

2. A Civilization That Refused to March

Sanatana Dharma looked at the same human anxiety — “What is the purpose of my life?” — and answered very differently.

It did not say, “Join this religion or burn in hell.”

It said, “You are already divine; realize that truth.”

From the Upanishadic dialogue of Nachiketa and Yama, where a small boy negotiates calmly with the Lord of Death for knowledge, to Sri Krishna revealing the Gita only when Arjuna collapses in moral crisis, our tradition insists on one principle: truth must be sought, not sold.

No Rishi was given a commandment to “go forth and convert.”

The Gurukul was not a recruitment center; it was a laboratory of consciousness.

Temples were not ‘sales offices’; they were ‘energy centers,’ where devotion, art, music, and philosophy met.

Sanatana Dharma assumed something profoundly optimistic — and, in a cruel world, dangerously naive:

If Truth is real, every sincere soul will eventually find it.

So instead of building missionary armies, Bharat built ashramas, tirthas, pathshalas, and paramparas. The model was inward-facing and seeker-driven, not outward-facing and market-driven.

3. “All Paths Lead to the Same Truth”: Tolerance or Strategic Blind Spot?

While other traditions anchored themselves in exclusive claims — “Believe in my God or perish” — Sanatana Dharma articulated an inclusive axiom:

“Ekam sat viprah bahudha vadanti” – Truth is one, the wise call it by many names. This wasn’t a slogan; it shaped civilizational behavior.

• When Zoroastrian Parsis arrived fleeing persecution, they were welcomed in Gujarat, allowed to practice their faith, and eventually flourished in trade and industry.
   
• Jewish communities found refuge on the Malabar coast centuries before Europe even considered them human.
   
• Later, Tibetan Buddhists fleeing China found sanctuary in India, setting up monasteries in Dharamshala and beyond.

Sanatana Dharma lived by Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam — “The world is one family.”  Guests were Atithi Devo Bhava, not potential recruits to be converted or erased.

But hospitality has a dark flip side.

When you truly believe all paths can lead to the same summit, you don’t detect early when some paths are actually bulldozers aimed at your mountain.

4. Ahimsa, Himsa and the Cost of Excess Tolerance

For centuries, Bharata flourished as a civilizational superpower — not just economically, but intellectually. Universities like Takshashila and Nalanda drew students from across Asia. Astronomers like Varahamihira, surgeons like Sushruta, mathematicians like Baudhayana and Aryabhata reshaped global knowledge long before those ideas were repackaged in European languages.

Then the swords arrived.

First as traders, then as raiders, then as rulers.

Temples were plundered; libraries were burnt; the physical ecosystems that sustained Dharma — mathas, pathshalas, royal patronage — were systematically attacked. Later, colonial powers added a quieter weapon: narrative warfare.

Our texts were dismissed as “myths,” our rituals as “superstition,” our knowledge systems as “primitive.” A civilization that once confidently declared the cosmos to be rta — an ordered, lawful reality — was told it had contributed nothing but snake-charmers and spices.

Even then, the instinctive response of many Dharmic minds was restraint:

“Ahimsa Paramo Dharma” – Non-violence is the highest virtue.

True. But our own scriptures also whisper the uncomfortable corollary:

“Himsa dharmena samyukta” – When force is used to protect Dharma, it too becomes Dharma.

We selectively remembered the first line and forgot the second.

Somewhere between Ahimsa and Himsa for Dharma, we chose paralysis.

Our philosophy stayed noble.

In a world ruled increasingly by greed and power, it also became a vulnerability.

5. When They Couldn’t Defeat Dharma, They Rewrote It

When theological debates failed to overthrow Dharmic thought — from Shankaracharya’s shastrarthas to later philosophical duels — a more sophisticated method emerged:  reinterpretation.

• Colonial education systems made Sanskrit optional, English compulsory, and slowly cut new generations off from original texts.
  
  
• Our own elites started parroting borrowed vocabulary: “I’m spiritual, not religious.” “I don’t believe in idol worship.” “I’m modern, not orthodox.”
  
  
• The same West that mocked our Rishis quietly mined them. They studied Vedanta while telling us it was “mysticism,” learned our mathematics while calling it “Arabic numerals,” absorbed meditation while packaging it as secular “mindfulness.”

We gave the world the zero, but they made us feel like nothing.

The result?

Sanatana Dharma did not just fail to expand. In many hearts, it shrank — not in metaphysical depth, but in confidence.

6. The Global Influence We Refuse to Count

If expansion is measured only in baptism certificates or conversion statistics, Sanatana Dharma looks like a non-starter.

But quietly, it has shaped global civilization in ways we still underestimate:

• The idea of karma and moral causality now appears in everyday language worldwide.
  
  
• Yoga and meditation, stripped of their roots, are multi-billion-dollar global industries.
  
  
• Philosophers from Schopenhauer to modern physicists have drawn inspiration from Upanishadic thought while rarely giving full credit.
  
  
• Non-violence as a political weapon, from Gandhi to Martin Luther King Jr., is rooted in Dharmic soil.

Ironically, Sanatana Dharma expanded everywhere except in its own name. Its ideas traveled, but its ‘identity’ was ‘systematically diluted.’

We succeeded in influencing the world, but failed to own our influence.

7. The New Battlefield: Not Kurukshetra, But Classroom and Screen

Today, the war for Dharma is not on traditional battlefields.

It lives in:

• School syllabi that skip millennia of Indian knowledge but devote chapters to every other civilization.
   
• Films and web series that caricature the “orthodox Hindu” as regressive, violent, or foolish.
   
• Social media where influencers with shallow understanding mock rituals they have never bothered to decode.
   
• Drawing rooms where showing open faith is treated as embarrassment, while ignorance of your own tradition is worn as a badge of sophistication.

No one needs to burn the Gita; they just need you to feel awkward reading it.

Dharma doesn’t vanish when outsiders attack. It fades when insiders stop defending, living, and transmitting it.

This is the real reason Sanatana Dharma did not expand: we assumed it would eternally sustain itself without deliberate teaching, translation, and modern articulation. We relied on ‘cultural osmosis’ in a world that has switched to ‘algorithmic propaganda.’

8. What Sanatana Dharma Must Learn — From Itself

Should Sanatana Dharma now copy missionary models, count “converts,” and threaten hellfire?

Absolutely not.

That would be a betrayal of its core insight: truth cannot be coerced; it must be realized.

But “no coercion” does not mean “no communication.” “All paths are valid” does not mean “erase your own path.”

There is a middle way — already encoded in our own history:

• The Buddha walked from village to village, teaching Dhamma with compassion but without compulsion.
   
• Adi Shankaracharya traveled the length of Bharat, establishing mathas and debating fiercely, yet his weapons were logic and scripture, not sword.
  
  
• Bhakti saints sang in local languages, democratizing access to the Divine for those outside elite circles.

The blueprint exists. We simply stopped using it.

In today’s context, that means:

• Deep Study, Not Shallow Pride
  Pride without knowledge is noise. Pride with study becomes power. Returning to the Vedas, Upanishads, the Gita, Itihaasas, and Puranas with modern translations and rigorous commentary is non-negotiable.
   
• Narrative Institutions, Not Just Ritual Infrastructure
  Temples must be more than venues for quick darshan. They can become centers for teaching, discussion, language learning, and cultural arts, where children and adults understand why they do what they do.
   
• Global Articulation in Global Languages
  Our Rishis spoke Sanskrit; today’s world speaks English, Spanish, Mandarin, code, and cinema. If Dharma is Sanatana — eternal — we must express it fluently in today’s languages, platforms, and metaphors.
   
• Firm Boundaries With Soft Hearts
  “Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam” does not mean letting your cultural house be dismantled while you serve tea to the demolition crew. True universalism requires a strong center. Protecting temples, traditions, and knowledge systems is not narrow chauvinism; it is civilizational self-respect.
   
• Counting Seekers, Not Just Survivors
  We may never chase conversions, but we must stop being ashamed of inviting sincere seekers — of any background — to study Dharma seriously. The doors were always open; we simply forgot to keep the lamps lit.

Final Thoughts: From ‘Survival’ to ‘Radiance’

So, why did every religion expand while Sanatana Dharma did not?

Because others built ‘empires of believers,’ while we tried to build ‘empires of inner realization.’

Because they coupled theology with ‘state power and mission,’ while we coupled wisdom with ‘freedom and patience.’

Because we trusted that Truth, like the sun, needs no marketing — forgetting that clouds of propaganda can still block sunlight from human eyes.

The question now is not, “Why didn’t we expand?” 

The real question is, “Will we at least awaken?”

Will we continue to outsource our understanding of Sanatana Dharma to textbooks and influencers who barely respect it?

Will we let our children inherit temples without meaning, rituals without context, festivals without philosophy?

Will we keep apologizing for the world’s oldest living civilization — or finally study it deeply enough to stand tall without hatred, but also without apology?

And when history looks back a few centuries from now, will it say that Sanatana Dharma merely ‘survived’ the age of empires… or that it finally ‘learned to radiate’ in its own luminous, unapologetic way?

Image (c) istock.com