Terror Message from Pune! by Rajinder Puri SignUp
Boloji.com
Boloji
Home Kabir Poetry Blogs BoloKids Writers Contribute Search Contact Site Map Advertise RSS Login Register
Boloji
Channels

In Focus

Analysis
Cartoons
Education
Environment
Going Inner
Opinion
Photo Essays

Columns

A Bystander's Diary
Business
My Word
PlainSpeak
Random Thoughts

Our Heritage

Architecture
Astrology
Ayurveda
Buddhism
Cinema
Culture
Dances
Festivals
Hinduism
History
People
Places
Sikhism
Spirituality
Vastu
Vithika

Society & Lifestyle

Family Matters
Health
Parenting
Perspective
Recipes
Society
Teens
Women

Creative Writings

Book Reviews
Ghalib's Corner
Humor
Individuality
Literary Shelf
Love Letters
Memoirs
Musings
Quotes
Ramblings
Stories
Travelogues
Workshop

Computing

CC++
Computing Articles
Flash
Internet Security
Java
Linux
Networking
My Word Share This Page
Terror Message from Pune!
by Rajinder Puri Bookmark and Share
 

Media commentators were quick to draw a link between the Pune serial bomb blasts and the appointment of Mr. Sushil Kumar Shinde as the new Home Minister. One begs to differ from their conclusion. One doubts if there was any connection at all between the two events apart from common timing. 
 
Certain features about the Pune blasts deserve noting. The serial blasts were all low intensity. Yet the ability to conduct these in quick succession at different points in the city indicates a high level of competence and organization. Serial blasts by themselves indicate that it was the work of a terrorist organization.
  
Why should terrorists issue a warning to Mr. Shinde?  On the other hand after Mr. Shinde’s performance as the power minister they should welcome his elevation. As Home Minister he offers hope to them.

There was another event that occurred to coincide with the terror blasts which failed to attract the attention of analysts. On the same day as the blasts the government gave a big boost to Indo-Pakistan ties by further promoting trade. The government has given permission to Pakistani citizens and companies to invest in India outside the defence, space and atomic sectors.
 
This indeed would greatly interest terrorists linked to each other for a common aim across India and Pakistan. Their common aim of course is to prevent any improvement of relations between both nations. Among the terrorists also there appears to be a division of objectives. One section seems wholly committed to permanent rupture between India and Pakistan in pursuance of the global agenda of a major power. This may be described as the global section. The other section appears limited to prizing Kashmir out of Indian control to realize Islamist dreams. This may be described as the Islamist section. Both sections are inimical to improved Indo-Pakistan ties that would get a boost through enhanced trade. 

The fact that the Pune blasts were all low intensity to greatly limit damage of life and property suggests that these were organized as a warning. The same blasts could have been engineered through use of lethal bombs. The Pune terror could well have been inspired by the Islamist section. A warning seems to have been issued that terror can be unleashed at will; and unless the Kashmir issue is resolved to the satisfaction of the Islamists it could recur with much greater intensity. Regardless of which transnational section organized the Pune terror, the government should dispel confusion about the prospects of Indo-Pakistan ties. Unless terrorism is effectively neutralized Indo-Pakistan peace moves will be repeatedly derailed by forces hostile to Indo-Pakistan accord through terror. 

That is why on April 13, 2012 it was pointed out in these columns:

“The UPA government is encouraging enhanced trade with Pakistan and China in the belief that this will build confidence and defuse India’s tensions with both countries. This approach is widely acclaimed by analysts and experts. It is a policy that needs to be pursued with extreme caution.

By pursuing this policy India could be walking into a trap…

Pakistan …recently… had received encouragement from Beijing to increase trade ties with India… President Zardari… said… contentious issues to remain on the back burner while trade is allowed to flourish…

Would President Asif Ali Zardari and Prime Minister Gilani be advancing trade ties with India without clearance from the Pakistan army? Why would Pakistan’s Generals allow enhanced trade with India? Why would their mentors in Beijing give them the nod to go ahead?

The reason could be simple. India could thereby get trapped into an arrangement that would be very difficult to exit.

What our government should never forget is that while India is a democracy, however badly governed, both China and Pakistan are for all practical purpose dictatorships controlled by their respective armies…

In dictatorships governments control big business. As trade between a democracy and a dictatorship grows the commercial vested interests influencing the democratic government become more powerful. In time these become unstoppable. The democratic nation becomes a prisoner of commercial interests that would sacrifice the national interest in order to protect and promote commercial profit.”

On the light of the above, enhancing trade ties without effectively addressing the terrorist threat could prove dangerously counter productive. 
 
So what might be done? 
 
With regard to that, whether right or wrong, one has definite ideas about how lasting Indo-Pakistan peace might be achieved. The Kashmir issue must be resolved to the satisfaction of both nations to defuse opposition in a section of Pakistan’s ruling establishment. Such a Kashmir solution can be achieved if a holistic approach to Indo-Pakistan relations is adopted. Such an approach would be possible if there could exist trust between both governments.  Trust could be achieved only if both armies were to reach accord. Both armies could reach accord only through an agreed joint defence strategy. Only after reaching such an agreement would terrorism end.

That is why the governments of both India and Pakistan deserve criticism. They are putting the cart before the horse. Joint security must precede enhanced trade and lasting friendship between both peoples.
   

2-Aug-2012
More by :  Rajinder Puri
 
Views: 734
Article Comment The Kashmir issue, as it stands today, is not defined by Indo - Pak commercial relationship or military stand- off. It is an emotional one whipped up by communal elements on both sides. If both the governments keep in touch with each other quietly,repeat quietly, on a continuous basis, perhaps the relationship between the two countries can be maintained on an even keel and major problems in future avoided.
K.Vijayakumar
08/03/2012
Article Comment Sir your analysis seems accurate till the last sentence where you slip badly. The thought that the Pakistani army whose very existence depends on enmity with India will even think of a joint defence strategy with the Indian Army is living in a dream-land.
Krish
08/03/2012
 
Top | My Word







A Bystander's Diary Analysis Architecture Astrology Ayurveda Book Reviews
Buddhism Business Cartoons CC++ Cinema Computing Articles
Culture Dances Education Environment Family Matters Festivals
Flash Ghalib's Corner Going Inner Health Hinduism History
Humor Individuality Internet Security Java Linux Literary Shelf
Love Letters Memoirs Musings My Word Networking Opinion
Parenting People Perspective Photo Essays Places PlainSpeak
Quotes Ramblings Random Thoughts Recipes Sikhism Society
Spirituality Stories Teens Travelogues Vastu Vithika
Women Workshop
RSS Feed RSS Feed Home | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Site Map
No part of this Internet site may be reproduced without prior written permission of the copyright holder.
Developed and Programmed by ekant solutions