Decoding Modi’s Clarion Call! by Rajinder Puri SignUp
Boloji.com
Boloji
Home Kabir Poetry Blogs BoloKids Writers Contribute Search Contact Site Map Advertise RSS Login Register
Boloji
Channels

In Focus

Analysis
Cartoons
Education
Environment
Going Inner
Opinion
Photo Essays

Columns

A Bystander's Diary
Business
My Word
PlainSpeak
Random Thoughts

Our Heritage

Architecture
Astrology
Ayurveda
Buddhism
Cinema
Culture
Dances
Festivals
Hinduism
History
People
Places
Sikhism
Spirituality
Vastu
Vithika

Society & Lifestyle

Family Matters
Health
Parenting
Perspective
Recipes
Society
Teens
Women

Creative Writings

Book Reviews
Ghalib's Corner
Humor
Individuality
Literary Shelf
Love Letters
Memoirs
Musings
Quotes
Ramblings
Stories
Travelogues
Workshop

Computing

CC++
Computing Articles
Flash
Internet Security
Java
Linux
Networking
My Word Share This Page
Decoding Modi’s Clarion Call!
by Rajinder Puri Bookmark and Share
 

Making his opening 50-minute speech immediately after being declared Chairman of the BJP National Campaign Committee Mr. Narendra Modi gave a clarion call to his party workers. He said India should be developed by liberating the nation from the Congress. He sought a Congress-mukt nirmaan. This was like music to my ears.

Readers would recall that this writer has repeatedly said that the Congress as an institution should be buried even though Congress leaders may continue to rule the nation.

This demand is made because the Congress acted as Imperial Britain’s political instrument for partitioning India. To undo the spirit of Partition it is necessary to discard Britain’s instrument used for achieving it. My demand echoes the last wish expressed by Mahatma Gandhi in his Will released on the day of his assassination. He wanted the Congress as a political party to be dissolved.

Burying the Congress implies discarding much of its political and cultural legacy that has overwhelmed India’s entire political and elite class. It implies a ruthless reappraisal of the political icons of the so-called freedom struggle worshipped by all sections of Indian society. It implies a searching probe into the respective roles of these icons in dividing Punjab and Bengal and their impotence to anticipate or prevent the horrendous bloodbath that followed the Partition. It implies a critical appraisal of whether the two lawyers from Gujarat, Gandhi and Jinnah, or the two feudal lords from Uttar Pradesh, Nehru and Liaquat Ali, were at all acquainted with the ground realities of the provinces they tore apart.

It implies the ability to acknowledge that our former icons were not Gods but human; even if they were great humans, it is human to err and they erred grievously. It implies that the popular myth that Jinnah was responsible for the Partition be rubbished. It implies that Britain’s central role in achieving Partition by successfully manipulating Gandhi, Jinnah, Nehru, Liaquat and Sardar Patel is recognized and acknowledge on the basis of the irrefutable evidence available. It implies that to rid the nation of the Congress legacy nothing less than a peaceful, democratic, cultural revolution is required.

Ridding India of the Congress implies all this and more.

Does Mr. Narendra Modi imply all this when he seeks Congress-mukt nirmaan? Or is that all he seeks is to defeat the Congress led by Mrs. Sonia Gandhi in a general election? That is what seems to be likely. If he were really committed against the Congress culture and legacy he would not make haste to erect the tallest statue of Sardar Patel whose role in allowing the Partition and colluding with the shameful betrayal of the secular Muslims of Punjab and Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan in NWFP cannot be glossed over.

There is considerable historical evidence that has yet to attain public attention. Undoubtedly the truth and the whole truth will come out. Undoubtedly the people of Punjab and Bengal will fight to propagate this truth and reclaim their cultural identities across national frontiers. Undoubtedly such a movement for transparency and truth will prevail.

Mr. Modi’s party went berserk over Mr. Advani’s opportunistic remarks during his visit to Pakistan extolling Jinnah who was Winston Churchill’s puppet. Mr. Advani deserves no praise for his praise of Jinnah. But do not the leaders of Mr. Modi’s party deserve censure for continuing to distort history and propagate falsehood?

For a start let them endorse the demand of the Central Information Commission (CIC) that the government should release and make public the speeches delivered by Jinnah over All India Radio prior to Independence. The CIC head Mr. Satyananda Mishra said that the time has come when all information relating to the pre-Independence period should be made public. He said: “It is easy for any public authority to take the stand that everything relating to Pakistan or the leaders who went over to Pakistan should be kept secret or confidential and invoke the provisions of Section 8(1)(a) and not disclose the details. This will be a regressive stand.” He added that history students and the general public have the right to know.

The question is: Do Mr. Modi and his colleagues want to know?

12-Jun-2013
More by :  Rajinder Puri
 
Views: 559
Article Comment Dinesh, I wrote that "even if they were great humans, it is human to err and they erred grievously". I do not question contribitions of Patel, or of Gandhi and the others. But because they were great men who might have done great things must we close our eyes to their follies the consequences of which diminish us till today? We will never get a great India unless we acknowledge those follies and take steps to undo them. Truth is a bitter pill. So sometimes is medicine. Both must be taken for a cure. .
My Word
06/14/2013
Article Comment "If he were really committed against the Congress culture and legacy he would not make haste to erect the tallest statue of Sardar Patel whose role in allowing the Partition and colluding with the shameful betrayal of the secular Muslims of Punjab and Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan in NWFP cannot be glossed over"

Let Sardar Patel himself tell us why he did that. Because the man who gave up PM's post because he followed certain principles and who fought against British rule with certain principles having faith in non violence, must have some reasons behind his thoughts and actions.

And if Sardar Patel can also be not revered for his great contribution to India as nation (some of his work left partial done while he departed and no one else pursued them to take up because probably other did not understand the importance of those actions), then let's suggest to all that the only leader to be revered is Subhash Chandra Bose.

But he can also be claimed guilty for irresponsibly colluding with Germans and Japanese to wage a war against British in India that endangered his life, because his presence was of very much importance to the nation after independence !
Dinesh Kumar Bohre
06/14/2013
 
Top | My Word







A Bystander's Diary Analysis Architecture Astrology Ayurveda Book Reviews
Buddhism Business Cartoons CC++ Cinema Computing Articles
Culture Dances Education Environment Family Matters Festivals
Flash Ghalib's Corner Going Inner Health Hinduism History
Humor Individuality Internet Security Java Linux Literary Shelf
Love Letters Memoirs Musings My Word Networking Opinion
Parenting People Perspective Photo Essays Places PlainSpeak
Quotes Ramblings Random Thoughts Recipes Sikhism Society
Spirituality Stories Teens Travelogues Vastu Vithika
Women Workshop
RSS Feed RSS Feed Home | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Site Map
No part of this Internet site may be reproduced without prior written permission of the copyright holder.
Developed and Programmed by ekant solutions